Does Social Media Selectively Transform the Protest Paradigm? Evidence from Online News and X Posts During Indonesia’s 2025 Demonstrations
DOI:
10.70211/ltsm.3026-7196.395Published:
2026-05-22Downloads
Abstract
This study examines how the protest paradigm operates in Indonesia’s hybrid media ecosystem by comparing online news coverage and social media posts during the August–September 2025 demonstrations. Using quantitative content analysis, this study analyzed 2,682 Detik.com news articles and 421 posts from the X account @barengwarga published between 25 August and 5 September 2025. The analysis focused on three dimensions: protest framing, sourcing patterns, and marginalization/legitimization devices, with differences between media types tested using chi-square analysis. The findings show that the protest paradigm is transformed selectively rather than uniformly. Riot and confrontation frames appeared at comparable levels in online news and social media, indicating the persistence of conflict-oriented protest representation. However, social media more frequently used spectacle and debate frames, foregrounded protesters’ voices, highlighted police violence, and represented protests as peaceful. In contrast, online news relied more heavily on institutional sources and more often associated protesters with violence. These statistically significant differences indicate that social media do not fully overturn the protest paradigm but reconfigure it by shifting narrative authority and moral attribution. This study contributes to protest communication scholarship by offering empirical evidence from a Global South hybrid media context.
Keywords:
Protest Paradigm Hybrid Media Online News Social Media News Framing Legitimation MarginalizationReferences
[1] N. Muhamad, “Update: 10 orang meninggal dalam unjuk rasa akhir Agustus 2025,” Databoks Katadata, Sep. 3, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/demografi/statistik/68b78b3026155/update-10-orang-meninggal-dalam-unjuk-rasa-akhir-agustus-2025
[2] Komisi Pencari Fakta, “Operasi pembungkaman kaum muda terbesar sejak reformasi: Laporan investigasi demonstrasi Agustus–September 2025,” Jakarta, Indonesia, Feb. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ylbhi.or.id/bibliografi/laporan/laporan-kpf-operasi-pembungkaman-kaum-muda-terbesar-sejak-reformasi/
[3] W. A. Gamson and G. Wolfsfeld, “Movements and media as interacting systems,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 528, no. 1, pp. 114–125, Jul. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293528001009
[4] D. M. McLeod and J. K. Hertog, “Social control, social change and the mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups,” in Mass Media, Social Control and Social Change: A Macrosocial Perspective, D. Demers and K. Viswanath, Eds. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press, 1999, pp. 305–330.
[5] J. M. Chan and C. C. Lee, “The journalistic paradigm on civil protests: A case study of Hong Kong,” in The News Media in National and International Conflict, A. Arno and W. Dissanayake, Eds. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 1984, pp. 183–202.
[6] D. M. McLeod and B. H. Detenber, “Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest,” Journal of Communication, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 3–23, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02802.x
[7] S. Harlow, “Framing #Ferguson: A comparative analysis of media tweets in the U.S., U.K., Spain, and France,” International Communication Gazette, vol. 81, no. 6–8, pp. 623–643, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518822610
[8] S. Harlow and D. K. Brown, “Protest news and Facebook engagement: How the hierarchy of social struggle is rebuilt on social media,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 665–691, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211017243
[9] S. Harlow and T. J. Johnson, “Overthrowing the protest paradigm? How The New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter covered the Egyptian revolution,” International Journal of Communication, vol. 5, pp. 1359–1374, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1239
[10] S. Harlow, R. Salaverría, D. K. Kilgo, and V. García-Perdomo, “Protest paradigm in multimedia: Social media sharing of coverage about the crime of Ayotzinapa, Mexico,” Journal of Communication, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 328–349, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12296
[11] S. Harlow, L. Camaj, and I. Pjesivac, “Protest reporting across clientelist media systems,” International Communication Gazette, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 365–385, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485221146862
[12] S. Harlow, D. K. Brown, R. Salaverría, and V. García-Perdomo, “Is the whole world watching? Building a typology of protest coverage on social media from around the world,” Journalism Studies, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1590–1608, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1776144
[13] M. Aharoni, “Aiming close to make a change: Protest coverage and production in online media as a process toward paradigm shift,” Journalism and Media, vol. 6, no. 2, Art. no. 78, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020078
[14] A. Lev-On, “Covering online protest: What changes and what remains the same? Examples from the protest for justice for Roman Zadorov,” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 389–401, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2024.2403505
[15] A. Ismail, G. Torosyan, and M. Tully, “Social media, legacy media and gatekeeping: The protest paradigm in news of Ferguson and Charlottesville,” The Communication Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 169–195, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2019.1651153
[16] I. Literat, L. Boxman-Shabtai, and N. Kligler-Vilenchik, “Protesting the protest paradigm: TikTok as a space for media criticism,” The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 362–383, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221117481
[17] Kompas, “Bareng warga, tak surut menolak revisi UU TNI meski disudutkan,” Mar. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.id/artikel/bareng-warga-tak-surut-menolak-revisi-uu-tni-meski-disudutkan
[18] K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
[19] K. A. Neuendorf, The Content Analysis Guidebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071873045
[20] N. Newman, A. R. Arguedas, C. T. Robertson, R. K. Nielsen, and R. Fletcher, Digital News Report 2025. Oxford, U.K.: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025
[21] M. Bossetta, “The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 471–496, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
[22] D. K. Brown, S. Harlow, V. García-Perdomo, and R. Salaverría, “From #Ferguson to #Ayotzinapa: Analyzing differences in domestic and foreign protest news shared on social media,” Mass Communication and Society, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 606–630, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1469773
[23] D. K. Brown and S. Harlow, “Protests, media coverage, and a hierarchy of social struggle,” The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 508–530, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219853517
[24] D. K. Brown, R. R. Mourao, and G. Sylvie, “Martin to Brown: How time and platform impact coverage of the Black Lives Matter movement,” Journalism Practice, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 413–430, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1507680
[25] D. K. Brown and S. Harlow, “Hearts and hahas of the public: Exploring how protest frames and sentiment influence emotional emoji engagement with Facebook news posts,” Journalism Studies, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1627–1647, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1908840
Author Biography
Eriyanto, Universitas Indonesia
Department of Communication Science
.png)
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eriyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
