Internal and External Determinants of Secondary School Teachers' Digital Literacy Effectiveness: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v3i3.530Keywords:
Digital Competence, Digital Equity, School Leadership, Secondary Education, Teacher Digital LiteracyAbstract
This study aims to identify and synthesize the internal and external determinants affecting the effectiveness of secondary school teachers’ digital literacy. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, drawing on empirical studies indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar. The findings show that digital literacy effectiveness emerges from the dynamic interaction between individual capacities and institutional conditions. The most influential internal determinants are digital pedagogical competence, self-efficacy, attitudes toward technology, intrinsic motivation, and prior technological experience. Key external determinants include ICT infrastructure, school leadership, institutional support, educational policy, collaborative school culture, and continuous professional development. At the secondary level, self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge are particularly important because they shape the quality of technology integration and support students’ higher-order thinking skills. The study concludes that teacher digital literacy should be understood as a multidimensional and ecosystem-based competence. Strengthening it therefore requires coordinated policies, sustained professional development, equitable infrastructure, and supportive school cultures that promote inclusive, adaptive, and meaningful digital learning.
References
[1] OECD, Education Policy Outlook 2022: Transforming Pathways for Lifelong Learners. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1787/c77c7a97-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/c77c7a97-en
[2] UNESCO, Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
[3] C. Redecker, European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
[4] G. Falloon, “From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, pp. 2449–2472, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
[5] W. Ng, “Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?,” Comput. Educ., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1065–1078, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
[6] J. Voogt, O. Erstad, C. Dede, and P. Mishra, “Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 403–413, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
[7] J. Tondeur, J. van Braak, P. A. Ertmer, and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, “Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 65, pp. 555–575, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
[8] E. J. Instefjord and E. Munthe, “Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 67, pp. 37–45, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
[9] Association of College and Research Libraries, Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago, IL, USA: ACRL, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
[10] M. B. Eisenberg, “Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age,” DESIDOC J. Lib. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 39–47, 2008. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.28.2.166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.28.2.166
[11] Y. Eshet-Alkalai, “Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy,” Informing Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 9, pp. 267–276, 2012. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/1621
[12] E. van Laar, A. J. A. M. van Deursen, J. A. G. M. van Dijk, and J. de Haan, “The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 72, pp. 577–588, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
[13] F. Pettersson, “On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts: A review of literature,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1005–1021, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3
[14] R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and J. Tondeur, “The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 128, pp. 13–35, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
[15] M. J. Koehler, P. Mishra, and W. Cain, “What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?,” J. Educ., vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 13–19, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
[16] S. K. Howard, J. Tondeur, F. Siddiq, and R. Scherer, “Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education,” Technol. Pedagogy Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 141–158, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543
[17] B. Kitchenham, O. P. Brereton, D. Budgen, M. Turner, J. Bailey, and S. Linkman, “Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A systematic literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
[18] M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, Art. no. n71, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[19] M. B. Eriksen and T. F. Frandsen, “The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review,” J. Med. Libr. Assoc., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 420–431, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345
[20] A.-W. Harzing, The Publish or Perish Tutorial: 80 Easy Tips to Get the Best Out of the Publish or Perish Software. Melbourne, Australia: Tarma Software Research, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://harzing.com/publications/publish-or-perish-book/tutorial
[21] Y. Xiao and M. Watson, “Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review,” J. Plan. Educ. Res., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 93–112, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
[22] D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement,” J. Clin. Epidemiol., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1006–1012, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
[23] H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
[24] D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, and P. Smart, “Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review,” Br. J. Manage., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 207–222, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
[25] J. Thomas and A. Harden, “Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 8, Art. no. 45, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
[26] Q. N. Hong et al., “The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers,” Educ. Inf., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 285–291, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
[27] M. Petticrew and H. Roberts, Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
[28] F. Siddiq and R. Scherer, “The relation between teachers’ emphasis on the development of students’ digital information and communication skills and computer self-efficacy: The moderating roles of age and gender,” Large-Scale Assess. Educ., vol. 4, Art. no. 17, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-016-0032-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-016-0032-4
[29] G. I. Sari, S. Winasis, I. Pratiwi, U. W. Nuryanto, and Basrowi, “Strengthening digital literacy in Indonesia: Collaboration, innovation, and sustainability education,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 10, Art. no. 101100, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101100
[30] P. A. Ertmer and A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, “Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 255–284, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
[31] B. Philipsen, J. Tondeur, Y. Blieck, and S. Vanslambrouck, “Teacher professional development for online teaching: An update of insights stemming from contemporary research,” in Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, and M. D. Childress, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2023, pp. 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_167
[32] J. Voogt, P. Fisser, N. Pareja Roblin, J. Tondeur, and J. van Braak, “Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A review of the literature,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–121, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
[33] T. Teo, Ed., Technology Acceptance in Education: Research and Issues. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-487-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-487-4
[34] A. Semerci and M. K. Aydın, “Examining high school teachers’ attitudes towards ICT use in education,” Int. J. Progress. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 93–105, 2018. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.7
[35] J. Fraillon, J. Ainley, W. Schulz, T. Friedman, and D. Duckworth, Preparing for Life in a Digital World: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 International Report. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5
[36] S. Dexter, “The role of leadership for information technology in education: Systems of practices,” in Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, and K.-W. Lai, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018, pp. 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_32
[37] L. Darling-Hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Learning Policy Institute, 2017. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
[38] T. Koltay, “The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy,” Media Cult. Soc., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 211–221, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382
[39] S. McGrew and J. Breakstone, “Civic online reasoning across the curriculum: Developing and testing the efficacy of digital literacy lessons,” AERA Open, vol. 9, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231176451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231176451
[40] S. Wineburg and S. McGrew, “Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 1–40, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102
[41] M. Ghomi and C. Redecker, “Digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu): Development and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for teachers’ digital competence,” in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Computer Supported Education (CSEDU), Heraklion, Greece, 2019, pp. 541–548. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007679005410548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0007679005410548
[42] J. Cabero-Almenara, F. D. Guillén-Gámez, J. Ruiz-Palmero, and A. Palacios-Rodríguez, “Digital competence of higher education professors according to DigCompEdu: Statistical research methods with ANOVA between fields of knowledge in different age ranges,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 4691–4708, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10476-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10476-5
[43] F. Caena and C. Redecker, “Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu),” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 356–369, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
[44] N. Selwyn, Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952
[45] Mailizar, A. Almanthari, S. Maulina, and S. Bruce, “Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 7, Art. no. em1860, 2020. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8240
[46] S. Dexter and J. W. Richardson, “What does technology integration research tell us about the leadership of technology?,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 17–36, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1668316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1668316
[47] P. A. Ertmer and A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, “Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning,” Comput. Educ., vol. 64, pp. 175–182, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anang Ristanto, Siswantoyo, Faqih Ma'arif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.