High Reading Literacy, Low Character? Exploratory-Descriptive Study of Literacy Learning Based on Cognitive Level L1-L3 in Superior High School Students
Article Integrity
Article Metrics
642
Article Views
196
PDF Downloads
0
Crossref Citations
Abstract
This study is an exploratory-descriptive study to determine the factors that cause the misalignment between the achievement of reading literacy ability and the character achievement of students from three high schools in East Java. Using qualitative descriptive methods, data was collected through open-ended interviews and literature studies as well as school documents. Researchers choose key informants and specialists because they are considered to have the initial information needed. Data analysis techniques using the Miles-Huberman technique include: data condensation; data display; and conclusion drawing/ verivication. Hasil kategori data: (1) reading literacy achievement profile; (2) the profile of the achievement of the student character survey; (3) Factors causing the misalignment of reading literacy achievement and reading surveys. All three are considered by researchers to have construction as the cause of the problem, although it is still necessary to develop further research. This study recommends the development of test instruments that adapt AKM questions and adaptive-reflective literacy learning models. Schools can realize educational SDgS for their students and become a literacy learning model school based on L1-L3 cognitive levels.
References
1
[1] M. J. Snowling and C. Hulme, “The reading is language model: A theoretical framework for language and reading development and intervention,” Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 195–218, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-111323-084821
2
[2] K. Marcq and J. Braeken, “From framework to functionality: A cross-country analysis of PISA 2018 reading assessment framework’s item features as determinants of item difficulty,” Large-Scale Assessments in Education, vol. 13, Art. no. 26, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00261-y
3
[3] S. Yoon, J. Kim, and S. Hong, “Students’ reading enjoyment as a multilevel mediator of the relationship between parental reading enjoyment, teachers’ stimulation of reading, ICT factors, and reading literacy,” International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 10, Art. no. 100554, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100554
4
[4] F. J. Madu and M. Jediut, “Membentuk literasi membaca pada peserta didik di sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 631–647, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v8i3.2436
5
[5] C. Perfetti and J. Stafura, “Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension,” Scientific Studies of Reading, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 22–37, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
6
[6] R. Smith, P. Snow, T. Serry, and L. Hammond, “The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review,” Reading Psychology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 214–240, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
7
[7] D. Paige, W. H. Rupley, and L. Ziglari, “Critical thinking in reading comprehension: Fine tuning the simple view of reading,” Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, Art. no. 225, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030225
8
[8] M. J. Filderman, C. R. Austin, A. N. Boucher, K. O’Donnell, and E. A. Swanson, “A meta-analysis of the effects of reading comprehension interventions on the reading comprehension outcomes of struggling readers in third through 12th grades,” Exceptional Children, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 163–184, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211050860
9
[9] H. Sohn, K. Acosta, M. T. Brownell, N. A. Gage, E. Tompson, and C. Pudvah, “A meta-analysis of interventions to improve reading comprehension outcomes for adolescents with reading difficulties,” Learning Disability Research & Practice, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 85–103, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12307
10
[10] E. Swanson, E. A. Stevens, N. K. Scammacca, P. Capin, A. A. Stewart, and C. R. Austin, “The impact of tier 1 reading instruction on reading outcomes for students in grades 4–12: A meta-analysis,” Reading and Writing, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1639–1665, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9743-3
11
[11] Z. Wang, J. Sabatini, T. O’Reilly, and J. Weeks, “Decoding and reading comprehension: A test of the decoding threshold hypothesis,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 387–401, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000302
12
[12] W. H. Jeynes, “A meta-analysis on the relationship between character education and student achievement and behavioral outcomes,” Education and Urban Society, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 33–71, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517747681
13
[13] J. A. Durlak, R. P. Weissberg, A. B. Dymnicki, R. D. Taylor, and K. B. Schellinger, “The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions,” Child Development, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 405–432, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
14
[14] R. D. Taylor, E. Oberle, J. A. Durlak, and R. P. Weissberg, “Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects,” Child Development, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1156–1171, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
15
[15] M. Sklad, R. Diekstra, M. De Ritter, J. Ben, and C. Gravesteijn, “Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment?,” Psychology in the Schools, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 892–909, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21641
16
[16] C. Cipriano et al., “The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions,” Child Development, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1181–1204, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13968
17
[17] A. Thapa, J. Cohen, S. Guffey, and A. Higgins-D’Alessandro, “A review of school climate research,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 357–385, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907
18
[18] M.-T. Wang and J. L. Degol, “School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 28, pp. 315–352, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
19
[19] Y. Pantiwati, T. Kusniarti, F. H. Permana, E. Nurrohman, and T. N. I. Sari, “The effects of the blended project-based literacy that integrates school literacy movement strengthening character education learning model on metacognitive skills, critical thinking, and opinion expression,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 145–158, 2023. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.145
20
[20] E. S. Wahyuni and S. Wahyuni, “The boosting academic literacy for young learners’ reading comprehension and character building,” Journal of English Educators Society, vol. 8, no. 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v8i1.1698
21
[21] N. Suarni, T. Taufina, and A. Zikri, “Literasi membaca meningkatkan karakter positif siswa sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1014–1021, 2019. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v3i4.215
22
[22] P. A. Amalia and A. Arditiya, “The use of dialogic reading in reading activity by implementing character building using local based literature,” Sebatik, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 762–766, 2021. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v25i2.1573
23
[23] M. Widjaja, D. Wahyudin, and R. Rusman, “Analysis of religious character value in literacy programs based on critical pedagogic,” Edukasi Islami, vol. 12, no. 3, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i03.4421
24
[24] K. Khadijah, I. Suciati, K. Khaerani, A. Manaf, and S. Sutamrin, “Schools’ character education values and students’ mathematics learning achievement: A meta-analysis,” Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 670–683, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.39924
25
[25] B. Street, “What’s ‘new’ in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice,” Current Issues in Comparative Education, vol. 5, no. 2, 2003. https://doi.org/10.52214/cice.v5i2.11369
26
[26] A. Luke, “Critical literacy: Foundational notes,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324
27
[27] S. F. Rivas, C. Saiz, and C. Ossa, “Metacognitive strategies and development of critical thinking in higher education,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 913219, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
28
[28] C. J. Ossa, C. Saiz, and S. F. Rivas, “Relation between metacognitive strategies, motivation to learn, and critical thinking,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, Art. no. 1272958, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272958
29
[29] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
30
[30] L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 16, pp. 1–13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
31
[31] S. Elo and H. Kyngäs, “The qualitative content analysis process,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107–115, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
32
[32] G. A. Tobin and C. M. Begley, “Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 388–396, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x
33
[33] J. Fereday and E. Muir-Cochrane, “Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 80–92, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
34
[34] M. Korstjens and A. Moser, “Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing,” European Journal of General Practice, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 120–124, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
35
[35] J. M. Morse, M. Barrett, M. Mayan, K. Olson, and J. Spiers, “Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 13–22, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
36
[36] H.-F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Author Biographies
Siti Agustini
Doctoral Program in Indonesian Language and Literature Education
Ribut Wahyuni Eriyanti
Doctoral Program in Indonesian Language and Literature Education
Masduki
Doctoral Program in Indonesian Language and Literature Education
Lilis Ernawati
Department of Education; Department of Islamic Primary Teacher Education.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Siti Agustini, Ribut Wahyuni Eriyanti, Masduki, Lilis Ernawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Information
Published
2026-06-25
Issue
Article Tools
Citation Impact
Crossref Cited-by
0
citations
Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.
Last checked 14 Nov 2026.