L1 as a Semiotic Tool: Deconstructing Grammatical Scaffolding in a Low-Exposure EFL Context in Indonesia
DOI:
10.70211/ltsm.3026-7196.413Published:
2026-08-11Downloads
Abstract
The instruction of abstract grammatical concepts, such as the Present Continuous Tense, presents significant cognitive challenges for Young Learners in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context, particularly where exposure to the target language is limited. While traditional "English-Only" pedagogies often view the use of the First Language (L1) as a hindrance, recent "multilingual turn" perspectives argue for its value as a cognitive resource. This study investigates the pedagogical functions of L1 (Indonesian) in a Grade 4 EFL classroom at a public elementary school located in the Sumenep region, East Java, Indonesia. Employing a descriptive qualitative case study design, the research utilizes Classroom Discourse Analysis (CDA) to examine the verbal interaction of a teacher candidate during a 73-minute instructional session. Preliminary analysis revealed that the teacher utilized L1 for approximately 80% of the instruction. However, rather than indicating a lack of proficiency, micro-analysis of the discourse demonstrates that this code-switching served as a systematic scaffolding strategy. The findings reveal four primary pedagogical functions of L1: (1) Meta-linguistic Scaffolding, used to bridge the conceptual gap between Indonesian lexical time markers and English morphological inflection; (2) Interactive Scaffolding, employed to repair communication breakdowns and sustain the Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) cycle; (3) Managerial Scaffolding, utilized to reduce extraneous cognitive load during complex task instructions; and (4) Affective Scaffolding, used to build rapport and reduce anxiety. The study concludes that in low-exposure TEYL contexts, the L1 functions not as a barrier, but as a vital semiotic tool that transforms abstract linguistic input into comprehensible intake.
Keywords:
L1 Use Scaffolding Classroom Discourse Analysis TranslanguagingReferences
[1] G. Hall and G. Cook, “Own-language use in language teaching and learning,” Language Teaching, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 271–308, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000067
[2] P. Kerr, “The use of L1 in English language teaching,” Cambridge Papers in ELT, pp. 2–17, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://languageresearch.cambridge.org/images/CambridgePapersInELT_UseOfL1_2019_ONLINE.pdf
[3] E. Macaro, “Codeswitching in the L2 classroom: A communication and learning strategy,” in Non-Native Language Teachers: Perceptions, Challenges and Contributions to the Profession, E. Llurda, Ed. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 2005, pp. 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24565-0_5
[4] L. Tian and E. Macaro, “Comparing the effect of teacher codeswitching with English-only explanations on the vocabulary acquisition of Chinese university students: A lexical focus-on-form study,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 367–391, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436909
[5] M. S. Zein, “Professional development needs of primary EFL teachers: Perspectives of teachers and teacher educators,” Professional Development in Education, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 293–313, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1156013
[6] S. N. Maili, “Bahasa Inggris pada sekolah dasar: Mengapa perlu dan mengapa dipersoalkan,” JUDIKA (Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2018. https://doi.org/10.35706/judika.v6i1.1203
[7] B. Setyono and H. P. Widodo, “The representation of multicultural values in the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture-endorsed EFL textbook: A critical discourse analysis,” Intercultural Education, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 383–397, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2019.1548102
[8] L. Cameron, Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733109
[9] A. Pinter, Teaching Young Language Learners, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN9780194403184
[10] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman, Eds. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1978. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
[11] J. P. Lantolf, S. L. Thorne, and M. E. Poehner, “Sociocultural theory and second language development,” in Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 2nd ed., B. VanPatten and J. Williams, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2014, pp. 207–226. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203628942-16
[12] M. Rabbidge, “The effects of translanguaging on participation in EFL classrooms,” The Journal of Asia TEFL, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1305–1322, 2019. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.15.1305
[13] M. Milawati, “Grammar translation method: Current practice in EFL context,” Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 187–196, 2019. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.437
[14] D. R. Mabule, “What is this? Is it code switching, code mixing or language alternating?” Journal of Educational and Social Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 339–350, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n1p339
[15] O. García and L. Wei, “Translanguaging, bilingualism, and bilingual education,” in The Handbook of Bilingual and Multilingual Education, W. E. Wright, S. Boun, and O. García, Eds. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell, 2015, pp. 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118533406.ch13
[16] S. Walsh, Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. London, UK: Routledge, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826
[17] H. P. Widodo, A. Wood, and D. Gupta, Eds., Asian English Language Classrooms: Where Theory and Practice Meet. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755243
[18] J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN9781506386706
[19] P. Baxter and S. Jack, “Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers,” The Qualitative Report, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 544–559, 2008. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
[20] R. E. Stake, The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/the-art-of-case-study-research-1-4954
[21] V. Spooner and K. Myres, “Building theoretical frameworks from an intrinsic single case and a diverse multi-case study: A comparison,” in Handbook of Case Study Research in the Social Sciences, P. Rule and V. M. John, Eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024, pp. 88–110. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803920320.00015
[22] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://study.sagepub.com/miles3e
[23] G. Jefferson, “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction,” in Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, G. H. Lerner, Ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins, 2004, pp. 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
[24] G. Ferguson, “Classroom code-switching in post-colonial contexts: Functions, attitudes and policies,” AILA Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 38–51, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.16.05fer
[25] S. D. Krashen, Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1982. [Online]. Available: https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
[26] S. Garton and F. Copland, Eds., The Routledge Handbook of Teaching English to Young Learners. London, UK: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623672
[27] F. Copland and G. Neokleous, “L1 to teach L2: Complexities and contradictions,” ELT Journal, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 270–280, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq047
[28] J. Sweller, “Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning,” Cognitive Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 257–285, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
[29] J. Bruen and N. Kelly, “Using a shared L1 to reduce cognitive overload and anxiety levels in the L2 classroom,” The Language Learning Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 368–381, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.908405
[30] A. M. Y. Lin, “Theories of trans/languaging and trans-semiotizing: Implications for content-based education classrooms,” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1515175
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Feisal Aziez, Novan Andrianto, Arifin Muslim, Aleeyah Masae, John Louie Domingo Galang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
