Teacher Strategies for Strengthening Learning Motivation in Islamic Religious Education: An Exploratory Case Study in an Indonesian Public Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v3i2.651Keywords:
Islamic Religious Education, Learning Motivation, Teacher Strategy, Student Engagement, Secondary EducationAbstract
Learning motivation is central to inclusive student support because it shapes whether learners attend to, participate in, and persist with classroom activity. This exploratory qualitative case study examines documented preliminary observations of Islamic Religious Education (IRE) instruction in Grade X E8 at an Indonesian public senior high school. The evidence concerns one IRE teacher and a class of 34 students. The analysis identifies a heterogeneous motivation profile: some students were attentive and participatory, whereas others were less focused, hesitant to respond, or minimally involved. Teacher practices comprised aperception, communication of learning objectives, motivational prompts, everyday-life examples, lectures, question-and-answer, and discussion. The findings are synthesized as a Motivational Alignment Cycle linking value framing, participation architecture, relational reinforcement, and responsive observation. The contribution is a context-sensitive framework that explains why method variation alone may not be sufficient unless students also perceive relevance, psychological safety, and attainable opportunities to contribute. The study informs teacher professional development and school-level psychosocial support in IRE and comparable value-oriented subjects. Because the source evidence is preliminary and does not include completed interviews, transcripts, or outcome measures, the article makes no causal or generalizable effectiveness claims.
References
[1] M. J. Halstead, “An Islamic concept of education,” Comparative Education, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 517–529, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510
[2] M. S. Mubarak and M. R. Fauzi, “Islamic Religious Education in the National Education System: Opportunities and Challenges for Character Building,” ATTHULAB: Islamic Religion Teaching and Learning Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 258–269, 2024. https://doi.org/10.15575/ath.v9i2.33377
[3] S. Wahyuni and S. Bhattacharya, “Strategy of Islamic Religious Education teachers in increasing student learning motivation,” Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 229–249, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v2i2.22
[4] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
[5] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 61, Art. no. 101860, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
[6] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 53, pp. 109–132, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
[7] J. Reeve, “Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 159–175, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
[8] H. Jang, J. Reeve, and E. L. Deci, “Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 588–600, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
[9] I. Ahn, M. M. Chiu, and H. Patrick, “Connecting teacher and student motivation: Student-perceived teacher need-supportive practices and student need satisfaction,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 64, Art. no. 101950, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101950
[10] J. A. Fredricks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 59–109, 2004. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
[11] M.-T. Wang and J. S. Degol, “Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement,” Child Development Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 137–143, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073
[12] D. L. Roorda, H. M. Y. Koomen, J. L. Spilt, and F. J. Oort, “The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 493–529, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
[13] E. Kikas, T. Vinter, M. H. Grande, and R. Mägi, “Knowledge of learning strategies and motivation to use them: An analysis of conditions for effective learning,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, no. 10, Art. no. 889, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100889
[14] C. S. Hulleman and J. M. Harackiewicz, “Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes,” Science, vol. 326, no. 5958, pp. 1410–1412, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
[15] J. M. Harackiewicz, J. M. Smith, and S. J. Priniski, “Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education,” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 220–227, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216655542
[16] K. S. Lazowski and C. S. Hulleman, “Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 602–640, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315617832
[17] A. J. Martin and M. Dowson, “Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 327–365, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583
[18] D. Yang, P. Chen, H. Wang, K. Wang, and R. Huang, “Teachers’ autonomy support and student engagement: A systematic literature review of longitudinal studies,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 925955, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955
[19] M. D. Kurniyadi and M. Fatimah, “Strategi guru Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam meningkatkan minat belajar pembelajaran PAI di SMAN 1 Colomadu Karanganyar,” Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1159–1166, 2025. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i2.1782
[20] Khairunnisa, A. Bunyamin, M. A. Sudarmono, R. Nengsih, and Ahmad, “Strategi guru Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa di SMKN 6 Enrekang,” Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 10, no. 3, 2025. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i03.31164
[21] S. S. Susanti, L. Nursafitri, I. Hamzah, R. Zunarti, Darmanto, Fitriyah, B. F. Asy’arie, and M. S. As’ad, “Innovative digital media in Islamic Religious Education learning,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 40–59, 2024. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7553
[22] A. Nurdin, Hendra, Khozin, A. Haris, N. Zainab, and M. Z. Yahaya, “Developing the Islamic Religious Education curriculum in inclusive schools or madrasah and its implementation: A systematic literature review,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 94–110, 2024. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.6907
[23] E. A. Ruzek, C. A. Hafen, J. P. Allen, A. Gregory, A. Y. Mikami, and R. C. Pianta, “How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 42, pp. 95–103, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
[24] J. Li and E. Xue, “Dynamic interaction between student learning behavior and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 59, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
[25] E. Acosta-Gonzaga and A. Ramirez-Arellano, “Scaffolding matters? Investigating its role in motivation, engagement and learning achievements in higher education,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 20, Art. no. 13419, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013419
[26] K. Prananto, S. Cahyadi, F. Y. Lubis, and Z. R. Hinduan, “Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students: A systematic literature review,” BMC Psychology, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 112, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w
[27] S. Crowe, K. Cresswell, A. Robertson, G. Huby, A. Avery, and A. Sheikh, “The case study approach,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 11, Art. no. 100, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
[28] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506330203
[29] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[30] L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 16, pp. 1–13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
[31] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 328–352, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
[32] S. J. Tracy, “Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 837–851, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
[33] J. M. Morse, M. Barrett, M. Mayan, K. Olson, and J. Spiers, “Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 13–22, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
[34] K. Malterud, V. D. Siersma, and A. D. Guassora, “Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 1753–1760, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
[35] B. Korpershoek, T. Harms, H. de Boer, M. van Kuijk, and D. Doolaard, “A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 643–680, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799
[36] B. Dincer, “The effects of teacher autonomy support on student engagement, learning, and well-being: A systematic review,” International Journal of Educational Methodology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 361–372, 2021. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.2.361
[37] J. Reeve and S. H. Cheon, “Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 54–77, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657
[38] Suraijiah, Rusdiana, Rusdiah, M. Ramli, and Murdan, “The strategies of Islamic Religious Education teachers in developing students’ learning motivation,” Jurnal Iqra’, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 335–349, 2023. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.2760
[39] E. Al Khansa, A. Pahrudin, A. Jatmiko, M. Sufian, and I. Azad, “The integrated learning model in Islamic Religious Education in junior high school,” Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 69–85, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21093/sajie.v7i2.9356
[40] C. Barksdale, M. L. Peters, and A. Corrales, “Middle school students’ perceptions of classroom climate and its relationship to achievement,” Educational Studies, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 84–107, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1664411
[41] D. Quin, “Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 345–387, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
[42] D. S. Yeager et al., “A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement,” Nature, vol. 573, pp. 364–369, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
[43] J. L. Sisk, A. P. Burgoyne, J. Sun, J. L. Butler, and B. N. Macnamara, “To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses,” Psychological Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 549–571, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fesa Nurpika, Ismail Fahri, M. Thontawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.