Holistic Personality and MBKM Decision-Making: Student Well-Being and Equitable Access in Indonesian Higher Education

Holistic Personality and MBKM Decision-Making: Student Well-Being and Equitable Access in Indonesian Higher Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v3i2.471

Keywords:

Independent Learning, Holistic Personality, Student Decision

Abstract

Independent Learning–Independent Campus (Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka; MBKM) promotes off-campus experiential learning, yet the psychological conditions shaping participation and the equity implications of access remain underexamined. This multisite cross-sectional study tested the association between holistic personality and decision-making among 260 undergraduate MBKM participants at a State Islamic University and a Muhammadiyah university in Indonesia. Proportional random sampling was applied within the available participant frame. A structured questionnaire assessed holistic personality (experiential, attitudinal, and creative values) and MBKM decision-making (self-control, external control, and absence of control). Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, and Pearson correlation were used. Most respondents reported moderate decision-making (80.8%; M = 30.50, SD = 6.21) and moderate holistic personality (65.4%; M = 138.54, SD = 14.88). Reliability was acceptable for decision-making (α = .67) and good for holistic personality (α = .81). Holistic personality correlated positively and moderately with MBKM decision-making (r = .477, p < .001). Self-control and experiential value were the dominant dimensions. The study contributes a psychological-equity account of MBKM: students’ capacity to regulate goals and derive meaning from experience is associated with more deliberate participation, but equitable participation requires information, financial, mobility, safety, and mentoring support. Universities should embed gender-responsive and welfare-sensitive safeguards in MBKM governance.

Author Biographies

Endah Kurniawati Purwaningtyas, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Department of Psychology

Andik Rony Irawan, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Department of Psychology

Triyo Supriyatno, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Department of Islamic Education

Abd. Rahman Ambo’ Dalle, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Department of Islamic Education

References

[1] Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia, Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemendikbud, 2020.

[2] Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia, Regulation No. 3 of 2020 on National Standards for Higher Education. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2020.

[3] N. Siregar, R. Sahirah, and A. A. Harahap, “Konsep Kampus Merdeka Belajar di era revolusi industri 4.0,” Fitrah: Journal of Islamic Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 141–157, 2020. https://doi.org/10.53802/fitrah.v1i1.13

[4] A. Faiz and I. Kurniawaty, “Konsep Merdeka Belajar pendidikan Indonesia dalam perspektif filsafat progresivisme,” Konstruktivisme: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 155–164, 2020. https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v12i2.973

[5] D. Sopiansyah, S. Masruroh, Q. Y. Zaqiah, and M. Erihadiana, “Konsep dan implementasi kurikulum MBKM (Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka),” Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2022. https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v4i1.458

[6] N. F. Azzahra and F. Amanta, The Implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Policy in Indonesian Higher Education. Jakarta, Indonesia: Center for Indonesian Policy Studies, 2021.

[7] UNESCO, Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722

[8] R. Barnett, The Ecological University: A Feasible Utopia. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315194899

[9] D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Education, 2015.

[10] A. Y. Kolb and D. A. Kolb, “Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 193–212, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566

[11] A. Bandura, “Toward a psychology of human agency,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 164–180, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

[12] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior,” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

[13] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

[14] C. D. Ryff, “Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1069–1081, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

[15] V. E. Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning. Boston, MA, USA: Beacon Press, 2006.

[16] G. W. Allport, Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York, NY, USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961.

[17] C. S. Hall and G. Lindzey, Theories of Personality, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1978.

[18] E. Unterhalter, Gender, Schooling and Global Social Justice. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965849

[19] L. W. Perna, “Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, J. C. Smart, Ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2006, pp. 99–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_3

[20] E. R. Kahu, “Framing student engagement in higher education,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 758–773, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

[21] E. R. Kahu and K. Nelson, “Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 58–71, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197

[22] A. Lizzio, K. Wilson, and R. Simons, “University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 27–52, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359

[23] B. J. Zimmerman, “Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

[24] J. P. Tangney, R. F. Baumeister, and A. L. Boone, “High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success,” Journal of Personality, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 271–324, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x

[25] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 53, pp. 109–132, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

[26] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 79–122, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

[27] M. Credé and S. Niehorster, “Adjustment to college as measured by the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire: A quantitative review of its structure and relationships with correlates and consequences,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 133–165, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9184-5

[28] M. Richardson, C. Abraham, and R. Bond, “Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 353–387, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838

[29] R. P. Auerbach et al., “Mental disorders among college students in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 2955–2970, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001665

[30] J. A. Durlak, R. P. Weissberg, A. B. Dymnicki, R. D. Taylor, and K. B. Schellinger, “The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions,” Child Development, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 405–432, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

[31] A. Mountford-Zimdars, J. Sanders, J. Moore, S. Jones, and D. Sabri, “What can universities do to support all their students to progress successfully throughout their time at university?,” Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 101–110, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2016.1203368

[32] M. Walker, “A human capabilities framework for evaluating student learning,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 477–487, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802169764

[33] T. H. Bailey and L. J. Phillips, “The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 201–216, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474

[34] H. Coates, “A model of online and general campus-based student engagement,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 121–141, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878

[35] J. Reeve and C.-M. Tseng, “Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 257–267, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

[36] R. Pekrun, “The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 18, pp. 315–341, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

[37] A. J. Martin and H. W. Marsh, “Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach,” Psychology in the Schools, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 267–281, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149

[38] D. H. Schunk and M. K. DiBenedetto, “Motivation and social cognitive theory,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 60, Art. no. 101832, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

[39] A. Kholik, H. Bisri, Z. K. Lathifah, B. Kartakusumah, M. Maufur, and T. Prasetyo, “Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) berdasarkan persepsi dosen dan mahasiswa,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 738–748, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.2045

[40] S. Andari, W. Windasari, A. C. Setiawan, and A. Rifqi, “Student exchange program of Merdeka Belajar–Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) in COVID-19 pandemic,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 30–37, 2021. https://doi.org/10.17977/um047v28i12021p030

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...