Articles Open Access CC BY 4.0

Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray Berbasis Media Roleplay Card terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam

Authors

  • Dian Nur hasanah UIN Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Ainal Gani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Evi Febriani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
Article Integrity Crossmark: Check for updates
Article Metrics
352 Article Views 147 PDF Downloads 0 Crossref Citations

Abstract

Learning activity is an essential indicator of successful learning in Islamic Religious Education. However, teacher-centered instructional practices often limit student participation and engagement during classroom learning. This study aims to analyze the effect of the Two Stay Two Stray learning model based on Roleplay Card media on students' learning activity in Islamic Religious Education at SMK Geomatika Bandar Lampung. This study employed a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental method with a post-test-only control group design. The sample consisted of an experimental class that received instruction through the Two Stay Two Stray learning model based on Roleplay Card media and a control class that received conventional learning. Data were collected through a learning activity questionnaire and analyzed using normality, homogeneity, and independent sample t-test analyses. The results showed a significant difference in learning activity between students in the experimental and control classes, with a significance value of 0.005 (p < 0.05). Students who learned through the Two Stay Two Stray model based on Roleplay Card media demonstrated higher levels of learning activity than those who experienced conventional instruction. These findings indicate that integrating cooperative learning with interactive learning media effectively promotes student engagement and participation in Islamic Religious Education. The study contributes to the development of innovative student-centered learning strategies and provides practical implications for teachers seeking to enhance classroom interaction and learning quality.

References

1
[1] A. Azani, “Hakikat Belajar dan Pembelajaran,” Maximal J. J. Ilm. Bid. Sos. Ekon. Budaya dan Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 17–37, 2024. https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v2i3.1183
2
[2] U. Jamaludin, “Karakteristik Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar (SD),” Didakt. J. Ilm. PGSD FKIP Univ. Mandiri, vol. 09, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2023.
3
[3] M. F. Fauzan, “Ruang Lingkup Manajemen Pendidikan pada Lembaga Pendidikan,” JIIP (Jurnal Ilm. Ilmu Pendidikan), vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 577–583, 2025. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i5.7923
4
[4] Muhadi, Jarir, Khairina, Rajuna, and E. Prasetyo, “Evaluasi Perencanaan Desain Pembelajaran, Pelaksanaan Proses Kegiatan Pembelajaran, dan Evaluasi Instrumen Hasil Pembelajaran,” Edu Soc. J. Pendidikan, Ilmu Sos. dan Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 159–165, 2025. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v5i2.1084
5
[5] S. Iskandar, “Strategi Mengoptimalkan Komponen Pembelajaran Untuk Mencapai Tujuan Pembelajaran,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 1–16, 2023.
6
[6] M. Zamiri and A. Esmaeili, “Strategies, Methods, and Supports for Developing Skills within Learning Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Adm. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090231
7
[7] R. S. Siregar, “Students’ Preferences for Varied Learning Methods: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness and Appeal of Diverse Instructional Approaches,” J. Profesi Guru Indones., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 140–152, 2024.
8
[8] Julismawati and N. Eliana, “Peran Guru dalam Menumbuhkan Karakter Peserta Didik,” J. Rev. Pendidik. Dasar J. Kaji. Pendidik. dan Has. Penelit., vol. 03, no. 10, pp. 1–23, 2024. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v10n3.p255-259
9
[9] N. N. Febriani, “Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Sebagai Pedoman Pembelajaran Dalam Membentuk Karakter Religius Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Hadits,” J. IHSAN J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 683–692, 2025. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v3i3.1420
10
[10] W. Anggraini and M. H. Islami, “Dimensions of Islamic Education in Shaping Students’ Character for 21st-Century Learning,” Int. J. Islam. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 82–88, 2025. https://doi.org/10.69637/ijiting.v2i2.635
11
[11] M. Arieny, D. Kartika, and M. M. Tibrani, “Implementation Social and Emotional Learning (SEL): Promoting Students’ Learning Activities,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2210–2221, 2023. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i4.1414
12
[12] B. D. S. Ghaleb, “Effect of Exam-Focused and Teacher-Centered Education Systems on Students’ Cognitive and Psychological Competencies,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Approach Res. Sci., vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 611–631, 2024. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v2i02.648
13
[13] T. A. Sakinah, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Meningkatkan Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Al-Afkar J. Pemikir. dan Pendidik. Islam, vol. 01, no. 2, pp. 370–376, 2025. https://doi.org/10.0111/afkar.v1i2.70
14
[14] U. Ruslandi, S. Qomariyah, and M. Sumitra, “Peran Metode Pembelajaran Diskusi dalam Menciptakan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa di MAS Tarbiyatul Islamiyah,” Katalis Pendidik. J. Ilmu Pendidik. dan Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2025. https://doi.org/10.62383/katalis.v2i1.1203
15
[15] M. Hanifah and P. P. Purbosari, “Studi Literatur: Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry (GI) terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotor Siswa Sekolah Menengah pada Materi Biologi,” BIODIK J. Ilm. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 38–46, 2022. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i2.14791
16
[16] M. Sari et al., “Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Student Centered Learning,” vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 219–230, 2024. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v18i1.4267
17
[17] F. D. Nuha, T. M. Anggriana, and R. Cristiana, “Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” TARQIYATUNA J. Pendidik. Agama Islam dan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 2022. https://doi.org/10.36769/tarqiyatuna.v1i2.248
18
[18] W. Iskandar, M. Azhari, and I. Waldi, “Implementasi Strategi The Learning Cell Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam,” Indones. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2026.
19
[19] Y. Budianti, A. Tasrif, and D. R. Budiati, “Penerapan Model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar Pada Materi Sifat-Sifat Bangun Ruang,” JMIE (Journal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Educ.), vol. 6, no. 2, p. 220, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32934/jmie.v6i2.485
20
[20] T. A. Wulandari and L. Rosdiana, “Improving Students’ Social Skills Through Cooperative Learning: The Effectiveness of the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Model,” Sci. Educ. Appl. J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2024. https://doi.org/10.30736/seaj.v6i2.1095
21
[21] L. Delfian and S. Arita, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Di SMA Negeri 2 Sungai Tarab,” J. Pendidik. Ekon., vol. 10, no. 2, 2025. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpe.v10i2.4991
22
[22] N. Amina, “Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Pembelajaran Sejarah Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray Di Kelas X C SMA Negeri 4 Palu,” J. Al-Qiyam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 335–342, 2025. https://doi.org/10.33648/alqiyam.v6i1.1159
23
[23] S. N. Faiqoh and S. S. Asih, “The Effectiveness of the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Cooperative Learning Model Compared to the Jigsaw Type on Students’ Science Learning Outcomes,” J. Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 937–945, 2025. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10491
24
[24] M. F. Hasibuan, “Efforts to Improve Student Learning Outcomes Through The Two Stay-Two Stray (TS-TS) Type Cooperative Learning Model In Class VI Mathematics Subjects At SDN 108384 Lubuk Pakam,” J. Classr. Action Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2024. https://doi.org/10.52622/jcar.v3i1.213
25
[25] S. Puspitasari and C. Liana, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Berbantuan Media Card Sort Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI-1 Pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Di SMA Negeri 1 Prambon,” Integr. Perspect. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 611–622, 2026.
26
[26] M. Albina et al., “Model Pembelajaran di Abad 21,” J. Univ. Dharmawangsa, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 941, 2022. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v16i4.2446
27
[27] S. Ashfia and C. Cinantya, “Meningkatkan Aktivitas, Kerja Sama, Dan Hasil Belajar Muatan IPS Dengan Menggunakan Kombinasi Model Problem Based Learning, Two Stay Two Stray & Talking Stick Pada Siswa Kelas V SDN 025 Tanah Grogot Kabupaten Paser,” Integr. Perspect. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3275–3282, 2025.
28
[28] K. H. Winarto, “The Implementation of the Two Stay Two Stray Cooperative Model to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Pancasila Education Learning (Classroom Action Research in Grade V at SD Negeri 1 Lemahabang),” JKIP J. Kaji. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1109–1126, 2025.
29
[29] F. Hidayah, P. Paidi, A. Maulidiya, F. R. Al-Farisi, and M. Anshori, “The Effect of the Cooperative Learning Model of the Two Stay Two Stray Technique on the Communication Skills of Students,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Anal., vol. 06, no. 07, pp. 3206–3214, 2023. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i7-46
30
[30] R. Mariska, F. Ferdiyanto, and B. Hamdani, “The Effectiveness of Using Two Stay Two Stray to Improve Students’ Speaking Skills,” J. English Lang. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 711–720, 2025. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i3.914
31
[31] S. I. Sulistiawati, “The Effectiveness of Using Two Stay To Stray Techniques in Teaching Reading Comprehension for Students of SMP IT Ibnu Sina Merauke,” Accel. Multidiscip. Res. J., vol. 03, no. 01, pp. 222–229, 2025. https://doi.org/10.70210/amrj.v2i04.116
32
[32] S. Rukoyah, “The Influence of The Two Stay Two Stray Learning Model on The Responsible Character of Fourth-Grade Elementary School Students in Science Learning,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 553–572, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v5i3.3828
33
[33] R. N. Frasandy, E. Suryati, and S. Yuliantika, “Efektifitas Media Smart Card (Kartu Pintar) dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pembelajaran Tematik,” Dawuh Guru J. Pendidik. MI/SD, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2022. https://doi.org/10.35878/guru.v2i2.466
34
[34] A. Ardyansyah and S. Rahayu, “Development and Implementation of Augmented Reality-Based Card Game Learning Media with Environmental Literacy for Improving Students’ Understanding of Carbon Compounds,” Orbital, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 118–126, 2023. https://doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v15i2.17617
35
[35] Selawati, A. Fatoni, and W. E. Wahyudi, “The Effectiveness of the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Interest in Islamic Religious and Character Education,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 19, no. 02, pp. 149–162, 2025. https://doi.org/10.30863/didaktika.v19i02.10799
36
[36] C. O. Pratama, “Penerapan Model Two Stay Two Stray Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa di Sekolah Dasar,” SOSIOLA Pedagog. J. Inov. Pendidikan, Sos. dan Hum., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 121–125, 2026.
37
[37] K. H. Winaryo, “The Implementation of the Two Stay Two Stray Cooperative Model to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Pancasila Education Learning (Classroom Action Research in Grade V at SD Negeri 1 Lemahabang),” JKIP J. Kaji. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1109–1126, 2025.
38
[38] R. R. Putri and R. Susanto, “Upaya Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Menggunakan Model Two Stay Two Stray,” JRTI (Jurnal Ris. Tindakan Indones.), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 111–124, 2023. https://doi.org/10.29210/30033106000
39
[39] H. E. Rahmawati and Junaidi, “Model Two Stay Two Stray terhadap Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dengan Aktivitas Window Shopping pada Pembelajaran IPS,” JIIP (Jurnal Ilm. Ilmu Pendidikan), vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 5827–5836, 2024. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i6.4599
40
[40] D. F. Une, S. W. D. Pomalato, and T. Machmud, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa,” Jambura J. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–23, 2023. https://doi.org/10.34312/jmathedu.v4i1.18206
41
[41] Fatimah, “Merekonstruksi Pembelajaran IPS: Media Interaktif, Gaya Belajar Siswa, Dan Kreativitas Guru Dalam Menumbuhkan Pemahaman Kontekstual,” Din. Sos. J. Pendidik. Ilmu Pengetah. Sos., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 150–162, 2025. https://doi.org/10.18860/dsjpips.v4i2.17921
42
[42] Kustanto, “Implementation Of The Two Stay Two Stray Model To Increase Social Studies Learning Outcomes,” J. Educ. Expert., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30740/jee.v6i1.178
43
[43] R. N. Putri and E. A. Febriani, “Penerapan Model Kooperatif Two Stay Two Stray Berbantuan Poster dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Sosiologi,” Naradidik J. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 113–121, 2026. https://doi.org/10.24036/nara.v5i1.424
44
[44] R. Nuriyani, S. A. Waluyati, and D. Dahlia, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dalam Meningkatkan Keaktifan dan Kreativitas Belajar Peserta Didik,” ASANKA J. Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 171–181, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21154/asanka.v4i2.7900
45
[45] A. Ramadani, “Perspektif Guru Tentang Rancangan Pembelajaran yang Berpusat pada Siswa (Student Centered Learning),” Biol. Educ. J. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2025. https://doi.org/10.62734/be.v5i1.406
46
[46] A. S. A. Pane, “Melampaui Pembelajaran Konvensional: Analisis Dampak Pembelajaran Kolaboratif terhadap Keterlibatan Aktif Siswa Pendidikan Vokas,” J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 108–120, 2026.
47
[47] S. R. Siregar, N. Ainun, and A. Syahrina, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas IV SDN 060950 Medan Labuhan,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 33–45, 2023. https://doi.org/10.61290/pgsd.v10i2.484
48
[48] I. Novrina, “Improving Students’ Learning Activeness and Achievement through the Two Stay Two Stray Learning Model Integrated with Group Guidance,” vol. 4, no. 2, 2025.
49
[49] E. F. Nurjadid, “Analisis Implementasi Ideologi Kurikulum Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam terhadap Perkembangan Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotor Peserta Didik,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1054–1065, 2025. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v5i2.1309
50
[50] D. R. Martatiyana, “Analisis Komparasi Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Dan Kurikulum 2013,” Muallimuna J. Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 96–109, 2023. https://doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v9i1.11600
51
[51] M. Sofirin, A. Rahim, and K. H. Najib, “Pengembangan Media Interaktif Flash Card dalam Pembelajaran Keragaman Budaya Pada Kelas IV di SD Negeri 1 Trirenggo Bantul,” JIIP (Jurnal Ilm. Ilmu Pendidikan), vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 9742–9749, 2025. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i8.8825

License

Download Article

Downloads

Article Tools

View Issue

Citation Impact

Crossref Cited-by

0
0 citations

Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.

Last checked 14 Sep 2026.