AI Power, Resistance, and Cultural Hegemony in The Golden Legend: A Foucauldian and Gramscian Analysis
DOI:
10.70211/ltsm.3026-7196.422Published:
2026-06-12Downloads
Abstract
This study examines how power, resistance, and cultural hegemony are represented in Nadeem Aslam’s The Golden Legend, with particular attention to the discursive construction of religious minority identity, gendered vulnerability, and ideological belonging in a postcolonial society. The study responds to the need for a more integrated reading of the novel, since previous scholarship has generally examined religious intolerance, minority representation, gendered subjectivity, nationalism, or Foucauldian surveillance as relatively separate concerns. Using a qualitative, interpretive, and non-empirical textual approach, the study applies Foucault’s concepts of disciplinary power, subjectification, discourse, and resistance, complemented by Gramsci’s theory of cultural hegemony. The analysis was conducted through close reading, deductive thematic coding, and critical discourse interpretation of selected narrative passages, character interactions, and representations of institutional authority. The findings show that power in the novel operates through religious authority, military pressure, patriarchal norms, communal surveillance, legal fear, and ideological consent. Marginalized characters internalize fear through silence, concealment, and self-regulation, yet they also resist through moral defiance, ethical refusal, compassion, memory, and identity reconstruction. The study concludes that The Golden Legend is not merely a narrative of oppression but a literary representation of how language, ideology, and identity become central sites where domination is produced, normalized, contested, and transformed. This study contributes an integrated Foucauldian-Gramscian framework for analyzing discourse, power, and resistance in postcolonial literary texts.
Keywords:
Cultural Hegemony Discourse Foucauldian Analysis Postcolonial Literature ResistanceReferences
[1] B. Russell, Power: A New Social Analysis. London, U.K.: Allen & Unwin, 1938. Online Available: https://archive.org/details/poweranewsociala022256mbp
[2] R. Bierstedt, “An analysis of social power,” American Sociological Review, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 730–738, Dec. 1950. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086605
[3] J. C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press, 1985. Online Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nq836
[4] M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY, USA: Pantheon Books, 1977. Online Available: https://archive.org/details/disciplinepunish0000fouc
[5] M. Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York, NY, USA: Pantheon Books, 1978. Online Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/The_History_of_Sexuality.html?id=0Mbc5eMjLpoC
[6] M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY, USA: Pantheon Books, 1980. Online Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Power_Knowledge.html?id=Aqf309sk_EsC
[7] N. Aslam, The Golden Legend. London, U.K.: Faber & Faber, 2017. Online Available: https://archive.org/details/goldenlegend0000asla_f1f1
[8] A. Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith, Eds. and Trans. New York, NY, USA: International Publishers, 1971. Online Available: https://www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/prison_notebooks/selections.htm
[9] C. Boggs, Gramsci’s Marxism. London, U.K.: Pluto Press, 1976. Online Available: https://archive.org/details/gramscismarxism0000bogg
[10] T. A. van Dijk, “Principles of critical discourse analysis,” Discourse & Society, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 249–283, Apr. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
[11] N. Fairclough, “Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities,” Discourse & Society, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 133–168, Apr. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
[12] T. A. van Dijk, “Discourse and manipulation,” Discourse & Society, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 359–383, May 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
[13] S. Ahmad, “Religious intolerance and minority representation in Nadeem Aslam’s The Golden Legend,” Journal of Postcolonial Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2019.
[14] A. Ahmad, “The politics of religious intolerance in Nadeem Aslam’s The Golden Legend,” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 489–503, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2019.1609057
[15] M. Qureshi and F. Jabeen, “Power, ideology, and marginalization in contemporary Pakistani fiction,” Pakistan Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 77–92, 2020.
[16] M. N. Qureshi and S. Jabeen, “The poetics of resistance: Religious power and female subjectivity in Nadeem Aslam’s The Golden Legend,” International Journal of English Linguistics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 220–230, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n4p220
[17] B. Zahoor, M. Ilyas, and M. Ajmal, “A Foucauldian discourse analysis of Nadeem Aslam’s The Golden Legend,” Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 241–251, Oct.–Dec. 2023. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-IV)20
[18] M. Clements, “Beyond the ‘recruitable’ narrative? The fictive portrayal of Pakistani Christians in Nadeem Aslam’s The Golden Legend,” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 854–868, Sep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2022.2117564
[19] M. M. Lazar, “Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis,” Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 141–164, Jul. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
[20] N. Widder, “Foucault and the art of resistance,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 411–432, Jul. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453704044023
[21] M. Batool, M. Ajmal, and R. Masum, “Representation of hybrid identities in Nadeem Aslam’s The Golden Legend: A transitivity analysis,” Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 23–38, 2022. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-II)03
[22] S. Shahzadi, M. Hanif, A. Ahmad, H. Ali, and M. Kousar, “Concept of nationalism employed in The Golden Legend by Nadeem Aslam,” Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1609–1615, Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2021.947
[23] G. A. Bowen, “Document analysis as a qualitative research method,” Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 27–40, Aug. 2009. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
[24] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[25] L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Oct. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
[26] S. Elo, M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs, “Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness,” SAGE Open, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Jan.–Mar. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
[27] H. K. Bhabha, “Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse,” October, vol. 28, pp. 125–133, Spring 1984. https://doi.org/10.2307/778467
[28] K. W. Crenshaw, “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color,” Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, Jul. 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
[29] C. T. Mohanty, “Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses,” Feminist Review, no. 30, pp. 61–88, Autumn 1988. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1988.42
[30] N. Yuval-Davis, “Intersectionality and feminist politics,” European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 193–209, Aug. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752
[31] S. Cho, K. W. Crenshaw, and L. McCall, “Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 785–810, Jun. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
[32] R. W. Connell and J. W. Messerschmidt, “Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept,” Gender & Society, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 829–859, Dec. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
[33] P. Baker, C. Gabrielatos, M. KhosraviNik, M. Krzyżanowski, T. McEnery, and R. Wodak, “A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press,” Discourse & Society, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 273–306, May 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962
[34] M. KhosraviNik, “The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005),” Discourse & Society, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 477–498, Jul. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104024
Author Biographies
.png)
Daryoosh Hayati, Mazoon College
Department of English
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anam Javed, Daryoosh Hayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
