Evaluasi Program Kesetaraan Paket C di PKBM Tabah Kota Bengkulu Menggunakan Model CIPP
Abstract
This study evaluates the implementation of the Package C Equivalency Program at PKBM Tabah, Bengkulu City, using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design involving six purposively selected informants: one program manager, two tutors, two learners, and one alumnus. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, direct observation, and document analysis, and credibility was strengthened through source, technique, and time triangulation. Data were analyzed interactively through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The findings show that the context component is aligned with the needs of heterogeneous learners who were unable to complete formal secondary education, although diploma-oriented motivation remains prominent. The input component is generally adequate, with bachelor-qualified tutors, gradual curriculum transition, multiple funding sources, and sufficient learning facilities, despite limited classroom capacity. The process component is characterized by contextual and andragogical learning, flexible scheduling, cumulative assessment, and internal and external supervision. The product component indicates positive semester-to-semester learning progress, continued alumni engagement, pathways to employment or further education, and high learner satisfaction. However, systematic documentation of internal evaluation across CIPP components remains limited. The study implies that PKBM managers should institutionalize evidence-based internal evaluation, strengthen learning-space capacity, and use evaluation findings as a continuous quality-improvement mechanism for equivalency education.
References
1
Republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, 2003.
2
S. Syamsuri, S. Darlan, and K. Indrajaya, “Implementasi Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Kurikulum Pendidikan Nonformal Pada PKBM Luthfillah Palangka Raya,” Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 120–127, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33084/neraca.v9i2.7176
3
A. Rembangsupu, K. Budiman, Bidin, Puspita, and M. Y. Rangkuti, “Studi Yuridis Tentang Jenis dan Jalur Pendidikan di Indonesia,” al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 91–100, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v5i4.337
4
S. Nurhayati, S. Musa, G. Boriboon, R. Nuraeni, and S. Putri, “Community Learning Center Efforts to Improve Information Literacy in the Community for Cyber Crime Prevention during a Pandemic,” Journal of Nonformal Education, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v7i1.26883
5
A. Saepudin, A. Sadikin, and I. Saripah, “The Development of Community Learning Center (CLC) Management Model to Improve Non-Formal Education Service Quality,” JPPM (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 196–202, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppm.v8i2.41784
6
D. Y. Lutfiansyah, H. Irnawati, Y. Shantini, I. Hatimah, and A. Khan, “Governance of Community Learning Centers in Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Nonformal Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2026. https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v12i1.41504
7
E. R. Prahestiwi, I. Hatimah, and A. Saepudin, “Pengelolaan Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (PKBM) Ash-Shoddiq Desa Pagerwangi Kecamatan Lembang Kabupaten Bandung,” Comm-Edu (Community Education Journal), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2022. https://doi.org/10.22460/comm-edu.v5i1.7319
8
U. L. Az Zahra and E. Tohani, “Strategi Pendanaan Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat di Kalimantan Barat,” Diklus: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 67–85, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21831/diklus.v8i1.84024
9
E. Koswara, Sutarjo, and N. Hoerniasih, “Manajemen Program Kesetaraan Paket C di Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat Kecamatan Jatisari,” Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 41–50, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32832/jpls.v16i2.14139
10
Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2013 tentang Pendirian Satuan Pendidikan Nonformal, 2013.
11
I. Rosidah, S. Sauri, and C. Syaodih, “Implementasi Pembelajaran Life Skill Pada Program Kesetaraan Paket C Untuk Membekali Warga Belajar Yang Siap Memasuki Lapangan Kerja,” Jurnal Eduscience, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 182–194, 2022. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v9i1.2591
12
A. W. Cahyaningtyas and J. Sutarto, “Implementasi Muatan Lokal pada Pembelajaran Program Paket C,” Journal of Nonformal Education and Community Empowerment, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 170–178, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15294/jnece.v5i2.39793
13
W. K. Murdani, Mustangin, A. I. Lukman, and A. R. Singal, “Studi Penyebab Putus Sekolah Warga Belajar Program Kesetaraan Paket C di PKBM Kedondong Samarinda,” Kompetensi, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2022. https://doi.org/10.36277/kompetensi.v15i1.68
14
I. R. Meilya and G. O. Emifa, “Implementasi Prinsip-prinsip Pembelajaran Orang Dewasa pada Program Kesetaraan Paket C di SKB Kabupaten Serang,” Journal of Nonformal Education and Community Empowerment, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 112–121, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15294/jnece.v5i2.51817
15
S. N. Nst and A. Anifah, “Analisis Kompetensi Andragogi Tutor Pendidikan Kesetaraan dalam Pembelajaran di Sanggar Kegiatan Belajar (SKB) Kota Medan,” VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1293–1301, 2024. https://doi.org/10.47467/visa.v4i3.5180
16
T. Sitinjak, “Analysis of Learning Motivation in the Implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Paket C at PKBM Azizi Medan,” Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 2, no. 5, 2023. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v2i5.4060
17
C. K. Simbolon, “Model Pembelajaran Orang Dewasa Inovatif untuk Pendidikan Luar Sekolah,” Paedagogi: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2025. https://doi.org/10.24114/paedagogi.v11i1.66711
18
R. M. Uliya, N. Hoerniasih, and U. Suminar, “Proses Pembelajaran Program Kesetaraan Paket C Melalui Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Andragogi di PKBM Bina Sejahtera Kabupaten Karawang,” Jurnal Eksistensi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 70–81, 2024. https://doi.org/10.30870/e-plus.v9i2.32210
19
A. I. B. Yahya, S. Purnama, and S. Supeno, “Eksplorasi prinsip andragogi dalam pendidikan orang dewasa: Sebuah studi kualitatif pada pendidikan formal dan non-formal di STIP Jakarta,” PTK: Jurnal Tindakan Kelas, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 136–152, 2024. https://doi.org/10.53624/ptk.v5i1.505
20
E. R. K. Waty, Y. K. Nengsih, C. Handrianto, and S. Rasool, “An In-Depth Analysis of the Students’ Perceptions of How the Final Exam Administered in Package C Program,” Journal of Nonformal Education, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 435–445, 2024. https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v10i2.9960
21
M. Ali, C. Prawening, and M. H. Samiaji, “Inovasi Model Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Program Kesetaraan Paket C di Masa Pandemi COVID-19,” JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21009/JIV.1502.2
22
C. Sukmana, O. Komar, M. Kamil, M. H. A. Mutamam, and I. Hatimah, “Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Standar Kompetensi Tutor Pendidikan Kesetaraan Melalui Sistem Pelatihan Berjenjang di PKBM Al-Insan Sumedang,” Jurnal Pendidikan Nonformal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 31–41, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17977/um041v20i22025p31-41
23
D. L. Stufflebeam and C. L. S. Coryn, Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2014.
24
M. P. Wulan, W. D. Listyasari, H. Santosa, and S. A. Huda, “A Systematic Literature Review on the CIPP Evaluation Model in Education: Examining Its Trends, Applications, and Research Gaps,” Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 307–320, 2026. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.10.3.p.307-320
25
D. G. H. Divayana, A. Adiarta, N. Santiyadnya, P. W. A. Suyasa, and M. S. L. Andayani, “Rancangan Model CIPP Berbasis WP Untuk Mengevaluasi Keefektifan Pembelajaran Online,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 275–285, 2022. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v6i2.47894
26
I. K. Sari, L. Kasmini, Rosdiana, and M. M. H. Manurung, “The Online Evaluation of the Teacher Certification Program Using the CIPP Model,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 164–176, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i2.57914
27
D. Y. Akhadi and I. Shofwan, “Evaluation of the CIPP Model of the Sewing Training Program,” Journal of Nonformal Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2024. https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v10i1.1723
28
A. P. Larasati, F. Simatupang, I. Septiana, M. R. Nurdianto, and S. A. Puspadanti, “Evaluasi CIPP (Context, Input, Process dan Product) Program Kesetaraan Paket C di SKB Kota Serang,” Transformasi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Non Formal Informal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtni.v10i1.9709
29
B. Kumalasari and L. Idawati, “Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Karakter di SD Athalia dengan Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product),” Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 60–72, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v11i2.65007
30
D. Darmawan, T. Karlina, and S. Hanafi, “Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Program Pendidikan Kesetaraan Paket C di Satuan Pendidikan Non Formal (SPNF) Sanggar Kegiatan Belajar (SKB) Kota Serang,” Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 491–498, 2024. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i1.2022
31
S. W. Larasati, F. D. Gumas, N. Azizah, A. Riansyah, and W. Septiani, “Evaluasi Program Kesetaraan Paket C di PKBM Al-Kahfi Menggunakan Model Evaluasi Bebas Tujuan,” Transformasi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Non Formal Informal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 86–94, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtni.v10i1.10067
32
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2018.
33
M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2015.
34
M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2020.
35
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 22 Tahun 2023 tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana, 2023.
36
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 21 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan, 2022.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Defa Yusmita, Dwi Ismawati, Wiwin Yunita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Information
Published
2026-09-10
