Articles Open Access CC BY 4.0

Evaluasi Deskriptif Pemahaman Guru dan Kualitas Rencana Pembelajaran Mendalam IPAS Setelah PPG Guru Tertentu dengan Kerangka Kirkpatrick

Authors

  • Betta Inda Sari Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang Indonesia
  • Tiara Ulandari Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang Indonesia
  • Warobi Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang Indonesia
  • Winda Fadhila Saputri universitas muhammadiyah palembang Indonesia
  • Saleh Hidayat Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang Indonesia
  • Bagas Rasid Sidik Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang Indonesia
Article Integrity Crossmark: Check for updates
Article Metrics
0 Article Views 0 PDF Downloads

Abstract

Deep learning is a pedagogical approach within Indonesia’s current curriculum framework, rather than a separate curriculum. This single-school, post-program descriptive study reports teachers’ understanding of Deep Learning Plans (Rencana Pembelajaran Mendalam, RPM) for Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) and the quality of the documents they prepared after participating in PPG Guru Tertentu. Eight teachers completed a 25-item true–false test, and eight RPM documents were scored using a 14-indicator rubric. The Kirkpatrick framework was used only to distinguish domains of evidence: the comprehension test relates to Learning (Level 2), whereas document quality does not itself establish workplace behavior transfer (Level 3) or program results (Level 4). The reported totals were 764/800 points (95.50%) for understanding and 380/448 points (84.82%) for document quality. Both fall within the study’s descriptive “very good” category. However, baseline scores, participant-level results, rubric descriptors, instrument quality evidence, and independent implementation data were unavailable for verification. The findings therefore provide a limited institutional snapshot, not causal evidence of PPG effectiveness. Future evaluations should document instrument quality and observe the use of learning plans in teaching.

References

1
M. Cevikbas, J. König, and M. Rothland, "Empirical research on teacher competence in mathematics lesson planning: Recent developments," ZDM – Mathematics Education, vol. 56, pp. 101–113, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01487-2
2
S. Hammer and S. Ufer, "Professional competence of mathematics teachers in dealing with tasks in lesson planning," Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 132, art. no. 104246, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104246
3
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, "Ringkasan Permendikdasmen Nomor 13 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan atas Permendikbudristek Nomor 12 Tahun 2024," Sistem Informasi Kurikulum Nasional, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://kurikulum.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
4
Y. Anggraena, D. E. Ginanto, A. T. Kesuma, and D. Setiyowati, Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen: PAUD, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah, ed. revisi 2025. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/33290/
5
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, "Pembelajaran Mendalam," Sistem Informasi Kurikulum Nasional, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://kurikulum.kemendikdasmen.go.id/pembelajaran-mendalam
6
Direktorat Jenderal Guru, Tenaga Kependidikan, dan Pendidikan Guru, Panduan Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) Guru Tertentu. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, 2024.
7
Y. Dwikurnaningsih, M. Waruwu, S. Irawan, and S. T. Satyawati, "The effectiveness of the online professional teacher education (PPG) program in improving teacher professionalism," Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 109–118, 2025. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v8i1.77875
8
B. N. Langelaan, L. Gaikhorst, W. Smets, and R. J. Oostdam, "Differentiating instruction: Understanding the key elements for successful teacher preparation and development," Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 140, art. no. 104464, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104464
9
K. Stavermann, "Online teacher professional development: A research synthesis on effectiveness and evaluation," Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 30, pp. 203–240, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09792-9
10
C. Sutinah, R. L. Mahardhika, and D. Kartini, Panduan Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam dan Sosial (IPAS): Fase B dan C. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/33599/
11
D. Y. Rahmawati, A. P. Wening, S. Sukadari, and A. D. Rizbudiani, "Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada mata pelajaran IPAS sekolah dasar," Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2873–2879, 2023. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.5766
12
J. I. Lestari, A. P. Maharani, A. R. Putri, M. Imaduddin, and A. M. Fanny, "Implementasi pembelajaran IPAS pada Kurikulum Merdeka di sekolah dasar," Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 215–225, 2026. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.14124
13
Z. Naimah, Mutmainnah, D. Setyowati, and Y. Listiarini, "Analisis kesesuaian modul ajar IPAS dengan komponen Kurikulum Merdeka pada kelas V di SD Negeri 12 Mempawah Hilir," Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 382–391, 2025. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v11i04.9570
14
J. D. Kirkpatrick and W. K. Kirkpatrick, Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006.
15
L. Rucks, L. Wingate, M. López, L. W. Becho, M. FitzGerald, and K. L. Dean, "Leveraging the Kirkpatrick four-level model to evaluate evaluation capacity building work," New Directions for Evaluation, no. 183, pp. 81–94, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20619
16
T. R. Guskey, Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press, 2000.
17
A. J. Visscher, N. Dmoshinskaia, M. Pellegrini, and A. Rey-Naizaque, "(When) do teacher professional development interventions improve student achievement? A meta-analysis of 128 high-quality studies," Educational Research Review, vol. 49, art. no. 100742, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100742
18
S. Tan, S. L. Goei, and T. M. Willemse, "Global insights on lesson study in initial teacher education: A systematic literature review encompassing English, Japanese, and Chinese language sources," Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 152, art. no. 104791, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104791
19
S.-C. Kong and Y.-Q. Wang, "The impact of school support for professional development on teachers' adoption of student-centered pedagogy, students' cognitive learning and abilities: A three-level analysis," Computers & Education, vol. 215, art. no. 105016, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105016
20
Mardhatillah and J. Surjanti, "Peningkatan kompetensi pedagogik dan profesionalitas guru di Indonesia melalui Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG)," Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 2023. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v15i1.65200
21
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
22
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, ed. ke-2. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2022.
23
Riduwan, Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2015.
24
Sukarno, Suyud, and M. V. Riyadini, "Analysing determinants of professional teacher competency attainment in pre-service teacher professional education," Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, vol. 9, no. 1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v9i1.73011

License

Download Article

Downloads

Article Tools

View Issue