Efektivitas Model Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas X pada Pembelajaran Biologi: Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Critical thinking is essential in biology education, yet empirical evidence concerning the effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) among Grade 10 students remains fragmented across different instructional approaches and research designs. This study aimed to synthesize empirical findings on the effectiveness of PBL in developing students’ critical thinking skills in biology education. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework. Articles were retrieved from Google Scholar and Scopus using Publish or Perish. Of 158 identified records, 10 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2024 were included in the narrative and thematic synthesis. The findings revealed consistently positive trends in critical thinking outcomes across standalone PBL and PBL integrated with collaborative strategies, STEM-based worksheets, and digital learning media. Improvements were reported in students’ interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation skills, while self-regulation required more explicit reflective activities. However, methodological heterogeneity and variations in assessment instruments limited direct comparisons and causal interpretations. These findings imply that biology teachers should implement PBL through authentic problems, structured inquiry, evidence-based discussions, appropriate instructional scaffolding, and formative assessment to support students’ critical thinking development.
References
1
S. Sujatmika, M. Masykuri, B. A. Prayitno, and S. Sutarno, “Fostering critical thinking in science education: Exploring effective pedagogical models,” Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 149–159, Jul. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.07.016
2
I. K. Wati, D. Rosana, and I. Wilujeng, “How science teachers foster critical thinking in junior secondary classrooms: A narrative inquiry from a constructivist perspective,” Int. J. Educ. Reform, Jun. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879261458338
3
C. O’Reilly, A. Devitt, and N. Hayes, “Critical thinking in the preschool classroom—A systematic literature review,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 46, Art. no. 101110, Dec. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101110
4
A. Id Babou, S. Selmaoui, A. Alami, N. Benjelloun, and M. Zaki, “Teaching biodiversity: Towards a sustainable and engaged education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 9, Art. no. 931, Sep. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090931
5
A. Cano-Ortiz, J. C. Piñar-Fuentes, C. M. Musarella, and J. Peña-Martínez, “Education for environmental sustainability component: Innovative strategies for experiential learning in natural contexts,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 6, Art. no. 697, Jun. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060697
6
R. H. Ennis, “The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities,” 2011. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215
7
P. A. Facione, “Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction,” 1990.
8
C. E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–266, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
9
O. Sabancı and N. Yürük, “Effect of metaconceptual processes on 7th-grade students’ understanding of the concepts of republic, democracy, and the state of law,” Instr. Sci., vol. 54, no. 2, Art. no. 54, Sep. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09805-3
10
E. Gkintoni, H. Antonopoulou, A. Sortwell, and C. Halkiopoulos, “Challenging cognitive load theory: The role of educational neuroscience and artificial intelligence in redefining learning efficacy,” Brain Sci., vol. 15, no. 2, Art. no. 203, Feb. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020203
11
Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Opinion paper: ‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 71, Art. no. 102642, Aug. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
12
S. Amin, S. Utaya, S. Bachri, Sumarmi, and S. Susilo, “Effect of problem-based learning on critical thinking skill and environmental attitude,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 743–755, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.650344
13
J. A. Orozco and R. T. Yangco, “Problem-based learning: Effects on critical and creative thinking skills in biology,” Asian J. Biol. Educ., vol. 9, pp. 2–10, 2016. https://doi.org/10.57443/ajbe.9.0_2
14
Suhirman, S. Prayogi, and M. Asy’ari, “Problem-based learning with character-emphasis and naturalist intelligence: Examining students’ critical thinking and curiosity,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 217–232, 2021. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14213a
15
H. S. Barrows and R. M. Tamblyn, Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. Springer Publishing Company, 1980.
16
J. R. Savery, “Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2006. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
17
Y. Liu and A. Pásztor, “Effects of problem-based learning instructional intervention on critical thinking in higher education: A meta-analysis,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 45, Art. no. 101069, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069
18
A. Masek and S. Yamin, “The effect of problem based learning on critical thinking ability: A theoretical and empirical review,” Int. Rev. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 215–221, 2011.
19
N. Salim, S. Santosa, and U. Fatmawati, “Penerapan model pembelajaran problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X MIPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Karanganyar tahun pelajaran 2014/2015,” Bio-Pedagogi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 15–21, 2015. https://doi.org/10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v4i2.5376
20
H. S. Mardiyanti, “Penerapan model pembelajaran problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X MIPA-2,” J. Classr. Action Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v2i1.395
21
T. Fakhrizal and U. Hasanah, “Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada mata pelajaran biologi melalui penerapan model pembelajaran problem based learning di kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Kluet Tengah,” Biot. J. Ilm. Biol. Teknol. dan Kependidikan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 200–217, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22373/biotik.v8i2.8222
22
M. A. Setiawan, D. A. Budiretnani, and B. Utami, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning dipadu student facilitator and explaining terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X SMAN 6 Kediri pada pokok bahasan fungi,” Florea J. Biol. dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2017. https://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v4i1.1167
23
A. Husen, S. E. Indriwati, and U. Lestari, “Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan proses sains siswa SMA melalui implementasi problem based learning dipadu think pair share,” J. Pendidik. Teor. Penelitian, dan Pengemb., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 853–860, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i6.9547
24
Z. Hasanah, A. U. T. Pada, Safrida, W. Artika, and Mudatsir, “Implementasi model problem based learning dipadu LKPD berbasis STEM untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis pada materi pencemaran lingkungan,” J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18134
25
M. Trisna, R. S. Iswari, and R. Susanti, “The development of PBL-oriented e-magazine to improve critical thinking skills and caring attitudes toward laboratory work safety,” J. Innov. Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 196–206, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v10i1.53159
26
Nurhasanah, P. K. Suprapto, and R. Ardiansyah, “The effectiveness of problem-based learning assisted by Articulate Storyline interactive media on students’ critical thinking skills,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v10i1.64847
27
K. Nihlah, R. H. Ristanto, and T. H. Kurniati, “The effect of PBL integrated RMS on biological literacy and critical thinking ability of high school students,” JPBI (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol. Indones.), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 714–723, 2024. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3.35515
28
B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,” 2007.
29
M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, Art. no. n71, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
30
H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
31
M. J. Page et al., “PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, Art. no. n160, Mar. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
32
Kardoyo, A. Nurkhin, Muhsin, and H. Pramusinto, “Problem-based learning strategy: Its impact on students’ critical and creative thinking skills,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1141–1150, 2020. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1141
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Siti Nuraini, Suci Wulan Pawhestri, Iqlima Amelia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Information
Published
2026-09-15
