Articles Open Access CC BY 4.0

Transformasi Administrasi Pendidikan Melalui Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Tata Kelola Sekolah Modern

Authors

  • Samsul Hadi Indonesia
  • Fitriyana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Muhammad akmansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Zulhanan Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Fachrul Ghazi Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
Article Integrity Crossmark: Check for updates
Article Metrics
15 Article Views 15 PDF Downloads 0 Crossref Citations

Abstract

Digital transformation is increasingly reshaping educational administration, yet existing studies rarely integrate technology use, digital leadership, data governance, and administrative outcomes within a single school-governance framework. This integrative literature review examines how digital technology is associated with administrative efficiency, information-system integration, transparency, accountability, digital leadership, and institutional readiness in modern school governance. The review synthesizes 25 core sources: 23 publications from 2019–2025 and two earlier EMIS policy/framework documents used only for conceptual support. Sources were retained through sequential title/abstract relevance screening and full-text eligibility assessment against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, then analysed using content analysis and thematic synthesis. The synthesis indicates that digital systems are associated with faster access to records, more structured reporting, improved information availability, and stronger support for managerial decision-making; however, the evidence remains heterogeneous and largely non-causal. Recurring constraints include infrastructure gaps, fragmented systems, uneven digital literacy, user resistance, dependence on technical operators, and data-security risks. The review proposes an integrative framework linking enabling conditions, organizational mechanisms, control mechanisms, core administrative processes, and governance outcomes. These findings imply that schools should adopt digital administration gradually, with clear data-governance rules, sustained capacity building, interoperability planning, and context-sensitive infrastructure support rather than treating application adoption as an end in itself.

References

1
G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
2
P. C. Verhoef, T. Broekhuizen, Y. Bart, A. Bhattacharya, J. Q. Dong, N. Fabian, and M. Haenlein, “Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 122, pp. 889–901, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
3
A. Hanelt, R. Bohnsack, D. Marz, and C. Antunes Marante, “A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1159–1197, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
4
D. Supriadi, H. Usman, and C. S. A. Jabar, “The moderation effect of information systems on vocational high school principal decision-making model,” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 43–55, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.31268
5
R. Hidayat and Y. E. Patras, “Digital leadership of school principals in Indonesia: Strategic interventions needed,” Pedagogia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagogia.v16i1.10209
6
A. Riski, D. Nurdin, N. Hartini, and M. D. H. Prajuri, “Implementation of digital leadership of school principals in Indonesia: Systematic literature review,” JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, vol. 15, no. 2, 2023. https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v15i2.51553
7
B. B. Wiyono, A. Komariah, A. A. Alghamdi, Sultoni, and M. Fahlevi, “The influence of principals’ e-leadership on the effectiveness of schools’ public relations and organizational improvement,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1296, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021296
8
E. C. Umah, A. Imron, S. Hadi, and H. Praherdhiono, “Madrasah principal digital leadership innovation in digital learning transformation,” Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, vol. 17, no. 3, e03365, 2023. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n3-025
9
M. R. Ridho, B. B. Wiyono, and Mustiningsih, “Digital leadership of school principals to improve the quality of learning in the industrial revolution era 4.0,” INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v29i1.9566
10
K. Zahro, D. E. Andriani, and P. D. Raihan, “Exploring vocational school principals’ digital leadership in cultivating school digital culture,” JDMP (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2025. https://doi.org/10.26740/jdmp.v10n1.p15-28
11
OECD, Shaping Digital Education: Enabling Factors for Quality, Equity and Efficiency. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/bac4dc9f-en
12
UNESCO, Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education—A Tool on Whose Terms? Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
13
E. Mukul and G. Büyüközkan, “Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 194, p. 122664, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664
14
M. Alenezi, “Deep dive into digital transformation in higher education institutions,” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 770, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120770
15
V. V. Forrester, “School management information systems: Challenges to educational decision-making in the big data era,” International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2019.8101
16
H. Abdul-Hamid, What Matters Most for Education Management Information Systems: A Framework Paper. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Group, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1596/21586
17
UNESCO, Re-orienting Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) towards Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2018.
18
T. Karakose, H. Polat, and S. Papadakis, “Examining teachers’ perspectives on school principals’ digital leadership roles and technology capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 23, p. 13448, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313448
19
F. Navaridas-Nalda, M. Clavel-San Emeterio, R. Fernández-Ortiz, and M. Arias-Oliva, “The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 112, p. 106481, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481
20
R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and J. Tondeur, “The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education,” Computers & Education, vol. 128, pp. 13–35, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
21
M. K. AlAjmi, “The impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 112, p. 101928, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101928
22
M. Sholeh, N. Kholis, and N. Mufidah, “Madrasah principal leadership in digital transformation at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah: A case study,” Dinamika Ilmu, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 151–166, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v22i1.4241
23
N. H. Hamzah, M. K. M. Nasir, and J. A. Wahab, “The effects of principals’ digital leadership on teachers’ digital teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia,” Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 216–221, 2021. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.82.216.221
24
A. Timan, Mustiningsih, and A. Imron, “Digital leadership kepala sekolah hubungannya dengan kinerja guru dan kompetensi siswa era abad 21,” JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 323–333, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17977/um027v5i42022p323
25
J.-Y. Qi, S.-C. Shao, Y. Ge, N. Chen, and K.-Y. Zhao, “Construction and interpretation of digital leadership model for primary and secondary school principals,” Modern Educational Technology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 74–84, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2025.02.008
26
R. Whittemore and K. Knafl, “The integrative review: Updated methodology,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 546–553, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
27
R. J. Torraco, “Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future,” Human Resource Development Review, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 404–428, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

License

Download Article

Downloads

Article Tools

View Issue

Citation Impact

Crossref Cited-by

0
0 citations

Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.

Last checked 04 Oct 2026.