Faculty Members' Mindset Profiles in Research Career Development: Preliminary Evidence for Positive Psychology-Based Mentoring in a Muhammadiyah-Affiliated University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v3i2.552Keywords:
Academic Career Development, Faculty Development, Growth Mindset, Human FactorsAbstract
Research engagement is constrained not only by skills and resources but also by how faculty members interpret feedback, failure, and capability development. This preliminary cross-sectional survey mapped research-career mindset profiles among 32 faculty members representing five faculties at Universitas Muhammadiyah Pringsewu, a Muhammadiyah-affiliated university in Indonesia. A structured questionnaire addressed beliefs about research competence, publication challenges, academic failure, and career growth. Descriptive analysis and Wilson 95% confidence intervals were used. Three faculty members (9.4%; 95% CI: 3.2%-24.2%) were classified as fixed-mindset, seven (21.9%; 11.0%-38.8%) as growth-mindset, and 22 (68.8%; 51.4%-82.0%) as mixed-mindset. The predominance of mixed profiles indicates openness to developing research competence alongside continuing doubts about revision, rejection, and methodological demands. Rather than treating research engagement as merely a technical deficit, the findings identify a human-factors need for mentoring that combines research-skill support with strengths-based feedback, mastery experiences, and psychosocial support. The results are descriptive and cannot establish causality or psychometric validation. They provide a baseline for developing and testing a positive psychology-based research mentoring model.
References
[1] S. Wilkins, J. Hazzam, and J. Lean, “Doctoral publishing as professional development for an academic career in higher education,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 19, no. 1, Art. no. 100459, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100459
[2] L. Ocampo et al., “Research productivity for augmenting the innovation potential of higher education institutions: An interpretive structural modeling approach and MICMAC analysis,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, no. 3, Art. no. 148, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030148
[3] E. G. Carayannis and J. Morawska-Jancelewicz, “The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 3445–3471, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2
[4] T. T. Hue et al., “Prioritization of factors impacting lecturer research productivity using an improved fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 10, Art. no. 6134, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106134
[5] A. C. Kadikilo, P. Nayak, and A. Sahay, “Barriers to research productivity of academics in Tanzania higher education institutions: The need for policy interventions,” Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 2351285, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2351285
[6] T. Yulianto and V. Juwono, “Performance and factors inhibiting research and scientific publication of Universitas Terbuka Indonesia lecturers,” Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 28–44, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31314/pjia.10.1.28-44.2021
[7] C. I. Gunawan, “An analysis of lecturers’ demographic factors affecting research performance in Indonesia,” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 326–332, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.759
[8] B. H. Phuong, D. T. P. Chi, D. M. Quang, B. N. Quang, and B. T. Dieu, “Factors influencing the research productivity among the academic staff: A case study at the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam,” Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, vol. 14, no. 3, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v14n3.21
[9] J. T. Pentang and J. G. Domingo, “Research self-efficacy and productivity of select faculty members: Inferences for faculty development plan,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1693–1709, 2024. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.4.1693
[10] S. Ndiango, N. P. Kumburu, and R. Jaffu, “Research self-efficacy and research productivity: Evidence from academics in Tanzanian public higher education institutions,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 510–522, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2022-0308
[11] R. Pasupathy and K. O. Siwatu, “An investigation of research self-efficacy beliefs and research productivity among faculty members at an emerging research university in the USA,” Higher Education Research and Development, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 728–741, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863843
[12] D. S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, “What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?,” American Psychologist, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 1269–1284, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794
[13] D. S. Yeager et al., “A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement,” Nature, vol. 573, no. 7774, pp. 364–369, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
[14] J. L. Burnette, E. H. O’Boyle, E. M. VanEpps, J. M. Pollack, and E. J. Finkel, “Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 655–701, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531
[15] R. Setiawan, R. S. I. Dewi, and R. Zainul, “Development of growth mindset in higher education in support of the world-class university,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 3806–3817, 2024. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.30145
[16] S. Chen, Y. Ding, and X. Liu, “Development of the growth mindset scale: Evidence of structural validity, measurement model, direct and indirect effects in Chinese samples,” Current Psychology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1712–1726, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01532-x
[17] A. E. Okon, V. J. Owan, and M. V. Owan, “Mentorship practices and research productivity among early-career educational psychologists in universities,” Education Process: International Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 105–126, 2022. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2022.111.7
[18] J. Atenas, C. Nerantzi, and A. Bussu, “A conceptual approach to transform and enhance academic mentorship through open educational practices,” Open Praxis, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 271–287, 2023. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.4.595
[19] H.-G. Le, S. Sok, and K. Heng, “The benefits of peer mentoring in higher education: Findings from a systematic review,” Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, no. 31, 2024. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi31.1159
[20] K. B. Etzkorn and A. Braddock, “Are you my mentor? A study of faculty mentoring relationships in US higher education and the implications for tenure,” International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 221–237, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-08-2019-0083
[21] T. D. Allen, L. T. Eby, M. L. Poteet, E. Lentz, and L. Lima, “Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 127–136, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127
[22] A. Sambunjak, S. E. Straus, and A. Marušić, “Mentoring in academic medicine: A systematic review,” JAMA, vol. 296, no. 9, pp. 1103–1115, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.9.1103
[23] C. Pfund, C. M. Pribbenow, J. Branchaw, S. M. Lauffer, and J. Handelsman, “Professional skills: The merits of training mentors,” Science, vol. 311, no. 5760, pp. 473–474, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123806
[24] S. I. Donaldson, J. Y. Lee, and S. I. Donaldson, “Evaluating positive psychology interventions at work: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 113–134, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-019-00021-8
[25] L. E. Van Zyl, L. C. Roll, M. W. Stander, and S. Richter, “Positive psychological coaching definitions and models: A systematic literature review,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, Art. no. 793, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00793
[26] K. Martinez-Martinez, V. Cruz-Ortiz, S. Llorens, M. Salanova, and M. Leiva-Bianchi, “Systematic review and meta-analysis of positive psychology interventions in workplace settings,” Social Sciences, vol. 14, no. 8, Art. no. 481, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14080481
[27] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
[28] A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, “The job demands-resources model: State of the art,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 309–328, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
[29] J. B. Avey, R. J. Reichard, F. Luthans, and K. H. Mhatre, “Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 127–152, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
[30] C. Lucey and C. van Nieuwerburgh, “More willing to carry on in the face of adversity: How beginner teachers facing challenging circumstances experience positive psychology coaching,” Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 62–77, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2020.1753791
[31] J. E. Shapiro, “Coach for positive (Coach4+): Using the intersection of positive psychology, positive organisational psychology and executive leadership coaching to facilitate positive leadership outcomes,” Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2023.2216776
[32] J. C. Goncalves et al., “Mentoring for well-being, engagement and academic achievement in higher education students,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, Art. no. 1606103, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1606103
[33] B. J. Sousa and A. M. Clark, “Growth mindsets in academics and academia: A review of influence and interventions,” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 38–56, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2024.2384003
[34] S. Sugiarti, A. Prihartini, A. P. Sari, and G. K. Zamahsari, “Developing a growth mindset in education: A bibliometric analysis and its challenge during pandemic,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2024. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26940
[35] V. F. Sisk, A. P. Burgoyne, J. Sun, J. L. Butler, and B. N. Macnamara, “To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses,” Psychological Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 549–571, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704
[36] E. von Elm et al., “The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies,” PLOS Medicine, vol. 4, no. 10, Art. no. e296, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
[37] K. Sijtsma, “On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha,” Psychometrika, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
[38] J. K. Flake and E. I. Fried, “Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them,” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 456–465, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
[39] A. J. Martin, “The role of positive psychology in enhancing satisfaction, motivation, and productivity in the workplace,” Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, vol. 24, pp. 113–133, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075V24N01_07
[40] M. E. P. Seligman and M. Csikszentmihalyi, “Positive psychology: An introduction,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
[41] K. E. Kram, “Phases of the mentor relationship,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 608–625, 1983. https://doi.org/10.2307/255910
[42] C. Yan, W. Gong, C. Zou, and J. Li, “Insights from informal research mentoring of three university EFL teachers,” Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 367–385, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2023-0303
[43] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 61, Art. no. 101860, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
[44] M. Z. Iqbal and A. Mahmood, “Factors related to low research productivity at higher education level,” Asian Social Science, vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 188, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n2p188
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ainur Rosidah, Sunyono Sunyono, Hasan Hariri, Muhammad Nurwahidin, Rabiyatul Adawiyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.