Articles Open Access CC BY 4.0

Human Centered Interactive Animated Video to Enhance Primary Students' Learning Enthusiasm in Human Digestive System Instruction: A Classroom Action Study in an Indonesian Islamic Elementary School

Authors

Article Integrity Crossmark: Check for updates
Article Metrics
648 Article Views 172 PDF Downloads 0 Crossref Citations

Abstract

Elementary science teachers need digital media that are not only visually attractive but also instructionally meaningful for young learners who often struggle with abstract biological processes. This classroom action study examined how an interactive animated video could improve fifth-grade students' learning enthusiasm in human digestive system instruction at an Indonesian Islamic elementary school. The study involved 21 students and was implemented through two action cycles consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Data were collected through student enthusiasm questionnaires, classroom observation sheets, teacher implementation observation, interviews, and documentation. The intervention used a short animated video showing the digestive pathway from the mouth to the anus, embedded with guiding questions, student worksheets, and group discussion. The findings show a consistent improvement in learning enthusiasm. The questionnaire mean increased from 2.26 in the pre-cycle to 3.00 in Cycle I and 3.39 after Cycle II, while classroom observation scores increased from 2.00 to 3.00 and then to 4.00. Students became more attentive, more willing to ask and answer questions, and more positive toward science learning. These results suggest that interactive animated video, when combined with teacher facilitation and reflective classroom improvement, can create a more engaging, enjoyable, and student-centered elementary science learning environment.

References

1
[1] R. E. Mayer, “Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction,” American Psychologist, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 760–769, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
2
[2] R. E. Mayer and R. Moreno, “Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
3
[3] R. Moreno and R. E. Mayer, “Interactive multimodal learning environments,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 309–326, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
4
[4] L. Fiorella and R. E. Mayer, “Eight ways to promote generative learning,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 28, pp. 717–741, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9
5
[5] T. N. Höffler and D. Leutner, “Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 722–738, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
6
[6] S. Berney and M. Bétrancourt, “Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis,” Computers & Education, vol. 101, pp. 150–167, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.005
7
[7] R. Ploetzner, S. Berney, and M. Bétrancourt, “When learning from animations is more successful than learning from static pictures: Learning the specifics of change,” Instructional Science, vol. 49, pp. 497–514, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09541-w
8
[8] C. J. Brame, “Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 4, Art. no. es6, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
9
[9] M. Noetel et al., “Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 204–236, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713
10
[10] B. B. de Koning, H. K. Tabbers, R. M. J. P. Rikers, and F. Paas, “Improved effectiveness of cueing by self-explanations when learning from a complex animation,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 183–194, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1661
11
[11] C. I. Johnson and R. E. Mayer, “Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1246–1252, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.025
12
[12] M. T. H. Chi and R. Wylie, “The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 219–243, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
13
[13] A. W. Lazonder and R. Harmsen, “Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 681–718, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
14
[14] E. M. Furtak, T. Seidel, H. Iverson, and D. C. Briggs, “Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 300–329, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
15
[15] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
16
[16] E. J. Theobald et al., “Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476–6483, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
17
[17] J. A. Fredricks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 59–109, 2004. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
18
[18] J. J. Appleton, S. L. Christenson, D. Kim, and A. L. Reschly, “Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 427–445, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
19
[19] E. A. Skinner, C. Furrer, G. Marchand, and T. Kindermann, “Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 765–781, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
20
[20] R. Azevedo, “Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
21
[21] E. R. Kahu, “Framing student engagement in higher education,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 758–773, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
22
[22] N. Nafi’a and T. Taufiqurrahman, “Development of interactive learning media for natural science based on Adobe Flash for elementary school,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 567–577, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.25718
23
[23] D. R. Dewi, A. S. Egok, and R. Febriandi, “Pengembangan multimedia interaktif berbasis Powtoon pada pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3799–3813, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1382
24
[24] M. Lubis, “Digital learning media in elementary science: Stimulating or demotivating?,” Assyfa Journal of Multidisciplinary Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2024. https://doi.org/10.61650/ajme.v1i1.497
25
[25] B. S. Sinambela and I. Pratiwi, “The effect of interactive media based on animated video on natural science process skills in elementary school,” Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, vol. 5, no. 3, 2024. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i3.921
26
[26] D. U. N. Diah, A. F. Surya, and E. Susiloningsih, “Application of animated video learning media to enhance elementary students’ ability to understand intrinsic elements of short stories,” EduStream: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 100–112, 2024. https://doi.org/10.26740/eds.v8n2.p100-112
27
[27] L. A. Caella and S. Yulianto, “The effectiveness of animation video media to increase interest and learning outcomes in science subjects,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 6621–6630, 2024. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8445
28
[28] N. P. G. Rutten, W. R. van Joolingen, and J. T. van der Veen, “The learning effects of computer simulations in science education,” Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 136–153, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
29
[29] L. K. Smetana and R. L. Bell, “Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1337–1370, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
30
[30] J. L. Plass, S. Heidig, E. O. Hayward, B. D. Homer, and E. Um, “Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 29, pp. 128–140, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006
31
[31] E. R. Um, J. L. Plass, E. O. Hayward, and B. D. Homer, “Emotional design in multimedia learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 485–498, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026609
32
[32] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 61, Art. no. 101860, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
33
[33] A. Bandura, “Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 1–26, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
34
[34] S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon, The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore: Springer, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
35
[35] A. R. Artino Jr., J. S. La Rochelle, K. J. Dezee, and H. Gehlbach, “Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87,” Medical Teacher, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 463–474, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814
36
[36] G. O. Boateng, T. B. Neilands, E. A. Frongillo, H. R. Melgar-Quiñonez, and S. L. Young, “Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 6, Art. no. 149, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
37
[37] A. R. Saavedra and V. D. Opfer, “Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 8–13, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203

Author Biographies

Fitria Fathkul Khotimah

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi Indonesia

Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training

Tabroni

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi Indonesia

Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training

Pauzan Azim

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi Indonesia

Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training

License

Download Article

Downloads

Article Tools

View Issue

Citation Impact

Crossref Cited-by

0
0 citations

Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.

Last checked 14 Nov 2026.