Efektivitas Model Predict, Observe, Explain (POE) terhadap Pemahaman Nilai-Nilai Islami pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Materi Asmaul Husna Kelas IV SD
Article Integrity
Article Metrics
44
Article Views
27
PDF Downloads
0
Crossref Citations
Abstract
Understanding Islamic values in primary Islamic Religious Education (PAI) requires learning experiences that move beyond memorization toward active interpretation and application. This study investigated the effectiveness of the Predict, Observe, Explain (POE) model in improving fourth-grade students' understanding of Islamic values in the Asmaul Husna topic. A quantitative quasi-experimental approach with a nonequivalent control-group design involved 54 students at SD Negeri 1 Rejosari, Ogan Komering Ulu Timur, divided equally into an experimental class receiving POE instruction and a control class receiving expository instruction. Data were collected using a validated 20-item multiple-choice test assessing C2 (understanding), C3 (applying), and C4 (analyzing). An independent-samples t-test revealed a statistically significant posttest difference between groups (t = 2.876, df = 52, p = 0.006). The experimental class achieved a higher N-Gain (75.20%; g = 0.752, high) than the control class (66.14%; g = 0.661, moderate), while Cohen's d = 0.78 indicated a moderate-to-large practical effect. The strongest descriptive advantage of POE appeared at the C2 level, suggesting that the model particularly supports students' understanding of the meaning of Islamic values. These findings indicate that POE can facilitate active and staged construction of value-based understanding by connecting prior conceptions, observed examples, and reasoned explanations. Pedagogically, POE offers a viable alternative for designing more participatory and meaningful PAI learning in primary schools.
References
1
S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
2
A. Kozanitis and L. Nenciovici, “Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: A meta-analysis,” Higher Educ., vol. 86, pp. 1377–1394, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8
3
P. Strelan, A. Osborn, and E. Palmer, “The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 30, Art. no. 100314, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
4
E. J. Theobald et al., “Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476–6483, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
5
P. K. Agarwal, L. D. Nunes, and J. R. Blunt, “Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: A systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 33, pp. 1409–1453, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9
6
[6] J. D. Karpicke, J. R. Blunt, and M. A. Smith, “Retrieval-based learning: Positive effects of retrieval practice in elementary school children,” Front. Psychol., vol. 7, Art. no. 350, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00350
7
L. Mumtahanah, “Integrasi nilai multikultural dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di sekolah dasar,” Nazhruna: J. Pendidikan Islam, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–74, 2020. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v3i1.461
8
Sukino and Failasufah, “Internalization of students’ scientific attitudes through Islamic education in Madrasah Aliyah,” Tadris: J. Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–106, 2019. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.4201
9
M. Muqowim, Sibawaihi, and N. D. Alsulami, “Developing religious moderation in Indonesian Islamic schools through the implementation of the values of Islam Wasatiyyah,” J. Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 207–222, 2022. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2022.192-03
10
K. Khotimah, A. M. Supandi, and Sutrisno, “Application of Islamic cultural-historical values in developing the character of learners in Islamic elementary school,” Nazhruna: J. Pendidikan Islam, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 183–193, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i1.1866
11
Zainuddin, Syihabuddin, A. P. Putra, and Nahadi, “Developing Qur’an-based self-assessment instruments for measuring and internalizing religious character values,” Tadris: J. Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 487–497, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v9i2.25027
12
S. Asy Syifa, S. Arif, and S. Gustiawati, “Penerapan nilai Pendidikan Islam di SDN Cimanggu 03 Cibungbulang Bogor,” Al-Mubin: Islamic Scientific J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2023. https://doi.org/10.51192/almubin.v6i01.495
13
R. Gustina, I. D. Hastuti, M. Nizaar, and Syaharuddin, “Predict Observe Explain learning model: Implementation and its influence on students’ critical thinking ability and learning outcomes (A meta-analysis study),” J. Kependidikan, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 706–718, 2023. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7388
14
J.-C. Hong, H.-S. Hsiao, P.-H. Chen, C.-C. Lu, K.-H. Tai, and C.-R. Tsai, “Critical attitude and ability associated with students’ self-confidence and attitude toward predict-observe-explain online science inquiry learning,” Comput. Educ., vol. 166, Art. no. 104172, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104172
15
F. K. Baydere, “Effects of a context-based approach with prediction-observation-explanation on conceptual understanding of the states of matter, heat and temperature,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 22, pp. 640–652, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00348D
16
S. Fatimatuzzohrah et al., “Efektivitas penerapan model pembelajaran POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep IPA,” J. Pijar MIPA, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 351–356, 2020. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i4.1653
17
I. K. Anam, E. Ningrum, and I. Setiawan, “Penggunaan model pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik,” J. Penelitian Pendidikan Geografi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 2024. https://doi.org/10.36709/jppg.v9i2.128
18
T. W. Astuti, J. Ariyanto, and S. Dwiastuti, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain (POE) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keaktifan belajar siswa,” J. Penelitian Sains dan Pendidikan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.23971/jpsp.v3i1.4482
19
Y. N. Qomariah and Z. A. I. Supardi, “Efektifitas penerapan model pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain untuk melatih keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMA dengan metode library research,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2022. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.49-56
20
Zulhelmi, D. Syaflita, N. C. Amelia, and Sohibun, “Predict-Observe-Explain learning model assisted by Educandy games to improve students’ conceptual understanding,” J. Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.09108
21
N. Ulfa, R. Witarsa, and W. Rianti, “Analisis penerapan model pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain terhadap pemahaman konsep sains siswa di sekolah dasar,” JIKAP PGSD: J. Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 598–607, 2021. https://doi.org/10.26858/jkp.v5i3.23324
22
L. Jasdilla, Y. Fitria, and W. Sopandi, “Predict Observe Explain (POE) strategy toward mental model of primary students,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1157, Art. no. 022043, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022043
23
Nurfadilah, R. Asra, and Syaiful, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain dan motivasi terhadap Higher Order Thinking Skills siswa,” BIODIK, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 143–152, 2021. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i2.12065
24
U. Supriatna, A. Samsudin, and R. Efendi, “Teaching solar system topic through Predict-Observe-Explain-Apply (POEA) strategy: A path to students’ conceptual change,” Tadris: J. Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, vol. 4, no. 1, 2019. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.3658
25
Y. Trisnayanti, W. Sunarno, M. Masykuri, Sukarmin, and Z. Jamain, “Determining students’ higher thinking skills profile using creative problem-solving model indicators integrated with Predict Observe Explain,” J. Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 387–400, 2023. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i3.44650
26
A. U. Mastura, Baharudin, N. Azizah, I. F. Hasanah, and R. Irawan Z, “The effectiveness of the POE (Predict, Observe, Explain) learning model on students’ learning outcomes,” J. Educational Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1704–1716, 2025. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.9.3.p.1704-1716
27
C. Aisahara, D. Makbuloh, and M. Mustofa, “POE (Predict, Observe, Explain): Efektivitas model pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik,” SECONDARY: J. Inovasi Pendidikan Menengah, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 577–587, 2026. https://doi.org/10.51878/secondary.v6i2.9875
28
A. Kholida, Nurdiansyah, and T. Yogiarni, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain (POE) terhadap peningkatan keterampilan sosial siswa sekolah dasar,” Pendas: J. Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 572–586, 2025. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i4.30132
29
H. Cham, H. Lee, and I. Migunov, “Quasi-experimental designs for causal inference: An overview,” Asia Pac. Educ. Rev., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 611–627, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09981-2
30
R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
31
J. Nissen, R. Talbot, A. Thompson, and B. Van Dusen, “Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 14, Art. no. 010115, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010115
32
Y. Kim and P. M. Steiner, “Quasi-experimental designs for causal inference,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 51, no. 3–4, pp. 395–405, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207177
33
K. S. Taber, “The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 48, pp. 1273–1296, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
34
Y. F. Zakariya, “Cronbach’s alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Art. no. 1074430, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430
35
N. Kala, F. Yaman, and A. Ayas, “The effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain technique in probing students’ understanding about acid-base chemistry: A case for the concepts of pH, pOH, and strength,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 555–574, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9354-z
36
H. Ş. Ayvacı, “Investigating the effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain strategy on teaching photo electricity topic,” J. Baltic Sci. Educ., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 548–564, 2013. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/13.12.548
37
M. Kearney, D. F. Treagust, S. Yeo, and M. G. Zadnik, “Student and teacher perceptions of the use of multimedia supported Predict-Observe-Explain tasks to probe understanding,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 589–615, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013106209449
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tyas Sekar Pratiwi , Deden Makbuloh, Chairul Amriyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Information
Published
2026-03-31
Issue
Article Tools
Citation Impact
Crossref Cited-by
0
citations
Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.
Last checked 12 Oct 2026.
