Budaya Literasi Digital-AI dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam: Penguatan Tabayyun Digital dan Integritas Akademik
Article Integrity
Article Metrics
501
Article Views
228
PDF Downloads
1
Crossref Citations
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has transformed how students access information, construct arguments, and complete academic tasks. In Islamic Religious Education (PAI), this transformation is not only technological but also epistemic and ethical because religious knowledge requires source validity, contextual interpretation, scholarly authority, and teacher guidance. This study aims to formulate an AI-digital literacy culture framework for strengthening digital tabayyun and academic integrity in PAI learning. Using an integrative literature review, this study synthesized 40 publications published between 2004 and 2026, with 37 publications concentrated in 2019–2026. Data were analyzed through literature extraction, thematic coding, and conceptual synthesis. The findings show that AI-digital literacy culture in PAI consists of six operational dimensions: information access literacy, AI limitation literacy, critical prompting literacy, digital tabayyun, academic integrity, and scholarly authority literacy. These dimensions indicate that AI can support exploratory learning, but its output must be verified through credible religious, academic, and pedagogical sources. The novelty of this study lies in transforming digital tabayyun from a moral recommendation into an observable academic procedure. The study implies that teachers, schools, and madrasahs need AI-use guidelines, source-verification rubrics, process-based assessment, and transparent AI disclosure to promote ethical and accountable learning in PAI.
References
1
[1] H. Crompton and D. Burke, “Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 22, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
2
[2] E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, p. 102274, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
3
[3] C. K. Lo, “What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 410, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
4
[4] A. Nguyen, H. N. Ngo, Y. Hong, B. Dang, and B.-P. T. Nguyen, “Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4221–4241, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
5
[5] E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell, “On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?,” in Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2021, pp. 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
6
[6] J. M. Halstead, “An Islamic concept of education,” Comparative Education, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 517–529, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510
7
[7] Z. Ji et al., “Survey of hallucination in natural language generation,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1–38, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
8
[8] A. Achruh, M. Rapi, M. Rusdi, and R. Idris, “Challenges and opportunities for implementing artificial intelligence in Islamic education in Indonesian higher education institutions,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 423–443, 2024. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.11.22
9
[9] N. Faizin, M. Alfan, A. Basid, M. R. Ramadhan, S. A. Panatik, and A. N. Kawakip, “Muslim students’ acceptance of artificial intelligence in Islamic religious education: An extended TAM approach,” Discover Education, vol. 4, p. 304, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00767-1
10
[10] R. Reksiana, A. Nata, D. Rosyada, M. D. H. Rahiem, and A. R. R. Ugli, “Increasing digital literacy competency for Islamic religious education teachers in the digital learning era,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 402–420, 2024. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i2.9719
11
[11] S. S. Susanti et al., “Innovative digital media in Islamic religious education learning,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 40–59, Jun. 2024. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7553
12
[12] O. Almatrafi, A. Johri, and H. Lee, “A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, implementation, and assessment efforts (2019–2023),” Computers and Education Open, vol. 6, p. 100173, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100173
13
[13] R. Annapureddy, A. Fornaroli, and D. Gatica-Perez, “Generative AI literacy: Twelve defining competencies,” Digital Government: Research and Practice, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3685680
14
[14] D. Long and B. Magerko, “What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
15
[15] H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 104, pp. 333–339, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
16
[16] R. J. Torraco, “Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future,” Human Resource Development Review, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 404–428, Dec. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
17
[17] R. Whittemore and K. Knafl, “The integrative review: Updated methodology,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 546–553, Dec. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
18
[18] M. M. Rahman and Y. Watanobe, “ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 5783, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
19
[19] H. Ji, I. Han, and Y. Ko, “A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: Focusing on the collaboration with human teachers,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 48–63, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873
20
[20] Y. Sun, D. Sheng, Z. Zhou, and Y. Wu, “AI hallucination: Towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, p. 1278, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03811-x
21
[21] X. Gu and B. J. Ericson, “AI literacy in K–12 and higher education in the generative AI era: An integrative review,” in Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Association for Computing Machinery, 2025, pp. 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/3702652.3744217
22
[22] D. R. E. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228–239, Mar. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
23
[23] M. Perkins, “Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond,” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
24
[24] K. Bittle and O. El-Gayar, “Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda,” Information, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 296, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296
25
[25] B. D. Lund, T. H. Lee, N. R. Mannuru, and N. Arutla, “AI and academic integrity: Exploring student perceptions and implications for higher education,” Journal of Academic Ethics, vol. 23, pp. 1545–1565, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09613-3
26
[26] C. Papakostas, “Artificial intelligence in religious education: Ethical, pedagogical and theological perspectives,” Religions, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 563, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050563
27
[27] B. Afwadzi, U. Sumbulah, N. Ali, and S. Z. Qudsy, “Religious moderation of Islamic university students in Indonesia: Acceptance of religious texts,” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, vol. 80, no. 1, p. a9369, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v80i1.9369
28
[28] E. Zamroni, P. G. Handayani, Gudnanto, I. Lestari, A. R. Azis, and A. R. Kumara, “Mapping religious moderation and its impact on Islamic education in Indonesia: A bibliometric approach,” Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 55–81, 2025. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v6i1.1487
29
[29] R. Sagala and I. Kandedes, “The role of Islamic education teachers in overcoming the negative impact of TikTok on adolescents in Lampung, Indonesia,” Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 947–990, 2024. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss2.art14
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ais Isti'ana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Information
Published
2026-03-31
Issue
Article Tools
Citation Impact
Crossref Cited-by
1
citation
Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.
Last checked 16 Oct 2026.
