Strategic Foresight dalam Manajemen Pendidikan untuk Membangun Sekolah Masa Depan: Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
10.70211/sakalima.v3i2.608Published:
2026-06-12Downloads
Abstract
Global uncertainty driven by digital disruption, artificial intelligence, ecological risk, social polarization, and shifting skills demand requires schools to move beyond routine annual planning toward anticipatory and future-oriented management. This systematic literature review synthesizes studies on strategic foresight in educational management for building future-ready schools. The review covers publications from 2015 to 2025 and adapts PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S principles. Searches were conducted across Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ERIC, Google Scholar, and complementary policy sources from OECD and UNESCO. From 1,240 initial records, 286 duplicates and 24 non-target records were removed before screening. After title-abstract screening, full-text eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal, 42 documents were included in the qualitative thematic synthesis. The findings show that strategic foresight in educational management is constructed as an anticipatory capacity rather than a linear prediction mechanism. Key practices include horizon scanning, weak signal analysis, scenario planning, strategy stress-testing, future visioning, professional learning, and adaptive governance. The publication trend indicates two major waves: a foundational phase in 2015 and a policy consolidation phase in 2025. The review proposes the FORESIGHT-SCHOOL model as a conceptual framework for integrating foresight into school planning, implementation, evaluation, and organizational learning. The study contributes to strategic educational management by positioning foresight as a core capability for building adaptive, resilient, and future-ready schools.
Keywords:
Anticipatory Governance Educational Management Future-Ready School Futures Thinking Scenario Planning Strategic Foresight Systematic Literature ReviewReferences
[1] UNESCO, “Rethinking Education: Towards a Global Common Good?,” Paris: UNESCO, 2015.
[2] OECD, “Trends Shaping Education 2025,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/ee6587fd-en.
[3] OECD, “Back to the Future of Education: Four OECD Scenarios for Schooling,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/178ef527-en.
[4] UNESCO, “Futures of Education,” Paris: UNESCO, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.unesco.org/en/futures-education.
[5] OECD, “Building Anticipatory Capacity with Strategic Foresight in Government,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/d7eb0bb6-en.
[6] R. Miller, Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century. Paris: UNESCO/Routledge, 2018.
[7] UNESCO, Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris: UNESCO, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722.
[8] A. M. McCarthy, D. Maor, A. McConney, and C. Cavanaugh, “Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 100479, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479.
[9] OECD, “Curriculum Flexibility and Autonomy,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
[10] OECD, “An Institutional Capacity Assessment of Latvia’s Education System: How to Enhance Its Capacity for Monitoring and Improvement Support,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
[11] A. Harris and M. Jones, “COVID 19: School leadership in disruptive times,” Sch. Leadersh. Manag., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 243–247, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479.
[12] N. Iivari, S. Sharma, and L. Ventä-Olkkonen, “Digital transformation of everyday life: How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 55, Art. no. 102183, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183.
[13] OECD, “OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en.
[14] OECD, “The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030,” Paris: OECD, 2017.
[15] A. Hines, “Getting ready for a post-work future,” Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2019.
[16] M. L. Rethlefsen et al., “PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA Statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews,” Syst. Rev., vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 39, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
[17] H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, pp. 333–339, Nov. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
[18] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
[19] M. J. Grant and A. Booth, “A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies,” Health Inf. Libr. J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 91–108, Jun. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
[20] Q. N. Hong et al., “Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), Version 2018: User Guide.” Montreal: McGill University, 2018.
[21] A. Hines and J. Gold, “An organizational futurist role for integrating foresight into corporations,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 101, pp. 99–111, 2015.
[22] A. Hines and P. Bishop, Thinking about the Future: Guidelines for Strategic Foresight, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Hinesight, 2015.
[23] S. Inayatullah and I. Milojević, What Works: Case Studies in the Practice of Foresight. Taipei: Tamkang University Press, 2015.
[24] M. Rhisiart, R. Miller, and S. Brooks, “Learning to use the future: Developing foresight capabilities through scenario processes,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 101, pp. 124–133, 2015.
[25] R. Rohrbeck, C. Battistella, and E. Huizingh, “Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 101, pp. 1–9, 2015.
[26] G. Gavetti and A. Menon, “Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight,” Strateg. Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 207–233, Sep. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2016.0018.
[27] R. Ramírez and A. Wilkinson, Strategic Reframing: The Oxford Scenario Planning Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[28] A. Hines, J. Gary, C. Daheim, and L. van der Laan, “Building foresight capacity: Toward a foresight competency model,” World Futur. Rev., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 123–141, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756717715637.
[29] J. Højland and R. Rohrbeck, “The role of corporate foresight in exploring new markets: Evidence from 3 case studies in the BOP markets,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 734–746, 2018.
[30] A. Schleicher, “The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030,” OECD Educ. Work. Pap., p. 23, 2018.
[31] R. Rohrbeck and M. E. Kum, “Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 129, pp. 105–116, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013.
[32] R. Vecchiato, “Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 436–447, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.010.
[33] J. O. Schwarz, C. Ram, and R. Rohrbeck, “Combining scenario planning and business wargaming to better anticipate future competitive dynamics,” Futures, vol. 105, pp. 133–142, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.10.001.
[34] OECD, Trends Shaping Education 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/trends_edu-2019-en.
[35] K. Leithwood, A. Harris, and D. Hopkins, “Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited,” Sch. Leadersh. Manag., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–22, Jan. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077.
[36] C. Laurell and C. Sandström, “Social media analytics as an enabler for external search and open foresight,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 2021.
[37] F. M. Reimers, Ed., Implementing Deeper Learning and 21st Century Education Reforms. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
[38] S. L. Robertson, “Guardians of the future: International organisations, anticipatory governance and education,” Glob. Soc. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 188–205, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.2021151.
[39] OECD, “Education Policy Outlook 2022: Transforming Pathways for Lifelong Learners,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022.
[40] OECD, Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en.
[41] UNESCO, Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? Global Education Monitoring Report 2023. Paris: UNESCO, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501.
[42] OECD, “Constructing Scenarios for the Future of Teaching in Flanders,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
[43] OECD, “What Does Child Empowerment Mean Today?,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.
[44] UNESCO, “Futures Literacy & Foresight,” Paris: UNESCO, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.unesco.org/en/futures-literacy.
[45] OECD, “Strategic Foresight Toolkit for Resilient Public Policy,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/bcdd9304-en.
[46] OECD, “Constructing Scenarios for the Future of Teaching in Austria,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025.
[47] OECD, “Constructing Scenarios for the Future of Teaching in Wales,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025.
[48] A. M. McCarthy, D. Maor, A. McConney, and C. Cavanaugh, “Digital transformation in education,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 100479, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Trian Hermawan, Tarekah Hasanah, Wahyu Febriana, Binti Luthfiyah, Nirva Diana, Aan Komariah , Badrudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
