Articles Open Access CC BY 4.0

Manajemen Strategis Berbasis Data dan Transformasi Digital dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan: Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Desmawati Indonesia
  • Erlian Eka Damayanti Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Evi Gusliana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Nirva Diana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Aan Komariah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Indonesia
  • Badrudin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Indonesia
Article Integrity Crossmark: Check for updates
Article Metrics
387 Article Views 169 PDF Downloads 0 Crossref Citations

Abstract

This study aims to synthesize the literature on data-driven strategic management and digital transformation in improving educational quality. This review is important because educational institutions are increasingly required to make evidence-based decisions, integrate information systems, and transform data into impactful improvement strategies. The method employed was a Systematic Literature Review by adapting PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S. The literature search was conducted through Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, DOAJ, Crossref, Google Scholar, Garuda/SINTA, and official Indonesian policy sources using keywords related to data-driven decision making, data-based planning, strategic educational management, digital transformation, Rapor Pendidikan, and educational quality. From 773 initial records, 153 duplicates were removed, 620 documents were screened, 144 full-text documents were assessed for eligibility, and 35 core documents were thematically analyzed. The findings indicate that data-driven educational quality improvement requires the integration of quality diagnosis, data interpretation, strategy formulation, digital program implementation, impact evaluation, and continuous correction. Key enabling factors include digital leadership, teachers’ data literacy, collaborative culture, data validity, technological infrastructure, and policy support. The main barriers include administrative orientation, fragmentation of information systems, gaps in analytical capacity, organizational resistance, and data ethics risks. This review proposes the SIGAP-DIGITAL model as a conceptual contribution to evidence-based educational quality governance.

References

1
[1] UNESCO, Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? Global Education Monitoring Report 2023. Paris: UNESCO, 2023.
2
[2] OECD, Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
3
[3] E. N. Purnomo, A. Imron, B. B. Wiyono, A. Y. Sobri, and Z. A. Dami, “Transformation of Digital-Based School Culture: Implications of Change Management on Virtual Learning Environment Integration,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2303562, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2303562
4
[4] K. Schildkamp, “Data-Based Decision-Making for School Improvement: Research Insights and Gaps,” Educ. Res., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 257–273, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
5
[5] E. B. Mandinach, “A Perfect Time for Data Use: Using Data-Driven Decision Making to Inform Practice,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 71–85, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
6
[6] E. B. Mandinach and K. Schildkamp, “Misconceptions about Data-Based Decision Making in Education: An Exploration of the Literature,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 69, p. 100842, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842
7
[7] Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, “Tentang Perencanaan Berbasis Data (PBD),” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pusatinformasi.rumahpendidikan.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
8
[8] Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, “Rapor Pendidikan,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://raporpendidikan.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
9
[9] Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, “Perencanaan Berbasis Data (PBD) untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar Menengah,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://pusatinformasi.rumahpendidikan.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
10
[10] J. M. Bryson, Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018.
11
[11] R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
12
[12] H. Mintzberg, B. Ahlstrand, and J. Lampel, Strategy Safari: Your Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2009.
13
[13] K. Leithwood, A. Harris, and D. Hopkins, “Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership Revisited,” Sch. Leadersh. Manag., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
14
[14] A. Harris and M. Jones, “COVID 19: School Leadership in Disruptive Times,” Sch. Leadersh. Manag., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 243–247, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479
15
[15] I. Izzah, Mulyadi, A. Walid, A. Padil, and D. Wahyudin, “Strategic Management of Schools for Excellence: Integrating Quality Culture and Character Development in Leading Educational Institutions,” AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 4654–4668, 2024. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5953
16
[16] L. M. Benavides, J. A. T. Arias, M. D. Serna, J. W. Bedoya, and D. Burgos, “Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 3291, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
17
[17] M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
18
[18] E. B. Mandinach and E. S. Gummer, Data Literacy for Educators: Making It Count in Teacher Preparation and Practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2016.
19
[19] A. Datnow and L. Hubbard, “Teacher Capacity for and Beliefs about Data-Driven Decision Making: A Literature Review of International Research,” J. Educ. Chang., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–28, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
20
[20] W. B. Kippers, C. H. D. Wolterinck, K. Schildkamp, C. L. Poortman, and A. J. Visscher, “Teachers’ Views on the Use of Assessment for Learning and Data-Based Decision Making in Classroom Practice,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 75, pp. 199–213, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.016
21
[21] J. Ebbeler, C. L. Poortman, K. Schildkamp, and J. M. Pieters, “The Effects of a Data Use Intervention on Educators’ Satisfaction and Data Literacy,” Educ. Assessment, Eval. Account., vol. 29, pp. 83–105, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9251-z
22
[22] F. Ansyari, W. Groot, and K. De Witte, “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Data Use Professional Development Interventions,” J. Prof. Cap. Community, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 256–289, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-09-2021-0055
23
[23] A. Booth, D. Papaioannou, and A. Sutton, Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review, 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2016.
24
[24] M. Petticrew and H. Roberts, Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
25
[25] E. S. Gummer and E. B. Mandinach, “Building a Conceptual Framework for Data Literacy,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 1–22, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700401
26
[26] F. M. Sandoval-Rios, C. Gajardo-Poblete, and J. A. Lopez-Nunez, “Role of Data Literacy Training for Decision-Making in Teaching Practice: A Systematic Review,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, p. 1485821, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1485821
27
[27] N. Iivari, S. Sharma, and L. Ventä-Olkkonen, “Digital Transformation of Everyday Life: How COVID-19 Pandemic Transformed the Basic Education of the Young Generation and Why Information Management Research Should Care?,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 55, p. 102183, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183
28
[28] K. Schildkamp and M. K. Lai, “Data-Based Decision Making: Teachers’ Use of Student Assessment Data to Improve Teaching and Learning,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 34, pp. 123–129, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.001
29
[29] K. Schildkamp, C. L. Poortman, and A. Handelzalts, “Data Teams for School Improvement,” Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 228–254, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192
30
[30] W. B. Kippers, C. L. Poortman, K. Schildkamp, and A. J. Visscher, “Data Literacy: What Do Educators Learn and Struggle with during a Data Use Intervention?,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 56, pp. 21–31, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.001
31
[31] J. Ebbeler, C. L. Poortman, K. Schildkamp, and J. M. Pieters, “Effects of a Data Use Intervention on Educators’ Use of Knowledge and Skills,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 48, pp. 19–31, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.11.002
32
[32] C. L. Poortman and K. Schildkamp, “Solving Student Achievement Focused Problems with a Data Use Intervention for Teachers,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 60, pp. 425–433, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.010
33
[33] F. M. van der Kleij, J. A. Vermeulen, K. Schildkamp, and T. J. H. M. Eggen, “Integrating Data-Based Decision Making, Assessment for Learning and Diagnostic Testing in Formative Assessment,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 324–343, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024
34
[34] B. Williamson, R. Eynon, and J. Potter, “Pandemic Politics, Pedagogies and Practices: Digital Technologies and Distance Education during the Coronavirus Emergency,” Learn. Media Technol., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 107–114, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
35
[35] C. Figueiredo, M. Sampaio, P. Marinho, A. D. Moraes, and P. Fernandes, “School Self-Evaluation in Decision Making: Perspectives from Portuguese School Leaders,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 12, p. 1275, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121275
36
[36] M. L. Rethlefsen et al., “PRISMA-S: An Extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews,” Syst. Rev., vol. 10, p. 39, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
37
[37] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

License

Download Article

Downloads

Article Tools

View Issue

Citation Impact

Crossref Cited-by

0
0 citations

Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.

Last checked 14 Sep 2026.