Integrasi Sustainable Development Goals dalam Program Pesantren Ekologi: Perbedaan Sustainability Awareness pada Siswa SMA
Article Integrity
Article Metrics
349
Article Views
158
PDF Downloads
0
Crossref Citations
Abstract
Sustainability awareness is a key component of education for sustainable development, yet empirical evidence regarding students’ awareness in ecological boarding school programs remains limited. This study aimed to examine the level of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) integration in the Pesantren Ekologi program, assess students’ sustainability awareness (SA), and investigate differences in SA based on gender and grade level. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed involving 406 senior high school students from West Java Province, Indonesia. Data were collected using Likert-scale questionnaires measuring SDGs integration and SA. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, and Welch ANOVA. The results indicated that SDGs integration within the Pesantren Ekologi program was perceived at a high level across cognitive, socio-emotional, and behavioral learning dimensions, while students’ SA was also generally high across environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Significant gender differences were found, with female students demonstrating higher SA than male students, although the effect size was small. In contrast, no significant differences were identified across grade levels. These findings suggest that SA is not necessarily associated with grade level alone and highlight the importance of contextual, participatory, and action-oriented learning experiences in sustainability education. The findings also support the implementation of SDG 4.7 by emphasizing the role of education in promoting sustainable development competencies. Future studies are recommended to employ longitudinal and mixed-methods approaches to better understand factors influencing students’ SA.
References
1
[1] IPCC, “AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023,” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2023. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
2
[2] UNEP, “Emissions Gap Report 2023 | UNEP - UN Environment Programme,” UN Environment Programme, 2023. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2023
3
[3] J. Rockström et al., “Safe and just earth system boundaries,” Nature, vol. 619, no. 7968, pp. 102–111, Jul. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8
4
[4] UNESCO, “Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives,” Paris, 2017. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
5
[5] M. Rieckmann, Learning to Transform the World: Key Competencies in Education for Sustainable Development. Paris: UNESCO, 2018. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261802
6
[6] M. Bascopé, P. Perasso, and K. Reiss, “Systematic review of education for sustainable development at an early stage: Cornerstones and pedagogical approaches for teacher professional development,” Sustainability, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030719
7
[7] R. Lozano, M. Y. Merrill, K. Sammalisto, K. Ceulemans, and F. J. Lozano, “Connecting competences and pedagogical approaches for sustainable development in higher education: A literature review and framework proposal,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 9, no. 10, Oct. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101889
8
[8] IPBES, “The global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services,” Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), Bonn, 2019. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ipbes.net/global-assessment
9
[9] Global Forest Watch, “Indonesia Deforestation Rates & Statistics,” Global Forest Watch. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/IDN/?map=eyJjYW5Cb3VuZCI6dHJ1ZX0%3D
10
[10] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, “Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional (SIPSN).” Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://sampahnasional.kemenlh.go.id/
11
[11] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Barat, “Provinsi Jawa Barat Dalam Angka 2023.” Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://jabar.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/57231a828abbfdd50a21fe31/provinsi-jawa-barat-dalam-angka-2023.html
12
[12] S. Kaza, L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden, “What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050,” World Bank, Washington, DC, 2018. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/d3f9d45e-115f-559b-b14f-28552410e90a. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
13
[13] V. R. S. Cheela, M. John, W. K. Biswas, and B. Dubey, “Environmental impact evaluation of current municipal solid waste treatments in India using life cycle assessment,” Energies (Basel), vol. 14, no. 11, Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113133
14
[14] Y. Dhokhikah, Y. Trihadiningrum, and S. Sunaryo, “Community participation in household solid waste reduction in Surabaya, Indonesia,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 102, pp. 153–162, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.013
15
[15] Asian Development Bank, “Indonesia: Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (Validation Report),” Asian Development Bank. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.adb.org/projects/37049-023/main
16
[16] World Bank, “Indonesia Marine Debris Hot Spot Rapid Assessment: Synthesis Report,” Washington, DC, 2020. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/983771527663689822/pdf/Indonesia-Marine-debris-hotspot-rapid-assessment-synthesis-report.pdf
17
[17] D. Olsson, N. Gericke, and S. N. Chang Rundgren, “The effect of implementation of education for sustainable development in Swedish compulsory schools—assessing pupils’ sustainability consciousness,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 176–202, Feb. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1005057
18
[18] W. L. Filho, “Education for sustainable development in higher education: Reviewing needs,” in Transformative Approaches to Sustainable Development at Universities, W. L. Filho, Ed. Cham: Springer, 2015, pp. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08837-2_1
19
[19] G. Caniglia et al., “The glocal curriculum: A model for transnational collaboration in higher education for sustainable development,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 171, pp. 368–376, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.207
20
[20] Y. Rahmawati, E. Taylor, P. C. Taylor, A. Ridwan, and A. Mardiah, “Students’ engagement in education as sustainability: Implementing an ethical dilemma-STEAM teaching model in chemistry learning,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 6, Mar. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063554
21
[21] Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Jawa Barat, “Pesantren Ekologi Ramadan 1447 H,” jabarprov.go.id. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.jabarprov.go.id/berita/pesantren-ekologi-ramadan-1447-h-kadisdik-dorong-kesadaran-hidup-ekologis-sejak-dini-23252
22
[22] J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
23
[23] J. Cohen, P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
24
[24] D. A. Dillman, J. D. Smyth, and L. M. Christian, Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 4th ed., vol. 154. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645
25
[25] UNESCO, Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2017.
26
[26] N. Gericke, J. Boeve-de Pauw, T. Berglund, and D. Olsson, “The sustainability consciousness questionnaire: The theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development,” Sustainable Development, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 35–49, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1859
27
[27] C. H. Lawshe, “A quantitative approach to content validity,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 563–575, Dec. 1975. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
28
[28] K. S. Taber, “The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1273–1296, Dec. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
29
[29] J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited, 2013.
30
[30] J. C. Nunnally and I. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
31
[31] L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 6th ed. London: Routledge, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
32
[32] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009. Accessed: May 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: www.sagepublications.com
33
[33] A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 6th ed. London: Sage Publications Limited, 2024.
34
[34] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
35
[35] C. Wamsler, “Education for sustainability: Fostering a more conscious society and transformation towards sustainability,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 112–130, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2019-0152
36
[36] A. Kollmuss and J. Agyeman, “Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 239–260, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
37
[37] M. Biasutti and S. Frate, “A validity and reliability study of the attitudes toward sustainable development scale,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 214–230, Feb. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660
38
[38] J. B. de Pauw, N. Gericke, D. Olsson, and T. Berglund, “The effectiveness of education for sustainable development,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 15693–15717, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115693
39
[39] K. Brundiers, A. Wiek, and C. L. Redman, “Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: From classroom into the real world,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 308–324, Sep. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371011077540
40
[40] R. Lozano, M. Barreiro-Gen, F. J. Lozano, and K. Sammalisto, “Teaching sustainability in European higher education institutions: Assessing the connections between competences and pedagogical approaches,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 6, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061602
41
[41] D. Lakens, “Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs,” Front. Psychol., vol. 4, Nov. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
42
[42] C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
43
[43] L. C. Zelezny, P.-P. Chua, and C. Aldrich, “Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism,” 2000.
44
[44] M. A. Vicente-Molina, A. Fernández-Sáinz, and J. Izagirre-Olaizola, “Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: Comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 61, pp. 130–138, Dec. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.015
45
[45] S. Otto and P. Pensini, “Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour,” Glob. Environ. Change, vol. 47, pp. 88–94, Nov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
46
[46] A. Wiek, L. Withycombe, and C. L. Redman, “Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development,” Sustain. Sci., Jul. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
Author Biographies
Ratna Sari
Master (Chemistry Education) dan Guru Kimia (SMA Negeri 6 Tambun Selatan)
Agung Purwanto
Head of Doctoral Program (Environmental Education)
Employment and Lecture (Chemistry Education, FMIPA, UNJ)
Muktiningsih Nurjayadi
Lecture (Chemistry Education, FMIPA, UNJ) dan Ketua Himpunan Kimia Indonesia or Indonesian Chemical Society: Tangerang Selatan, Banten, ID
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ratna Sari, Agung Purwanto, Muktiningsih Nurjayadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Information
Published
2026-06-13
Issue
Article Tools
Citation Impact
Crossref Cited-by
0
citations
Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.
Last checked 20 Sep 2026.
