Articles Open Access CC BY 4.0

Menumbuhkan Literasi Lingkungan dan Self-Confidence Melalui Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning Berorientasi Nilai Lingkungan dalam Pembelajaran Biologi

Authors

  • Bayu Anshor Mursalin Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang Indonesia
  • Edo Wijaya UIN Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0011-5701
  • Ambar Indriyani UIN Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
  • Tisya Selviani Ariyamti UIN Raden Intan Lampung Indonesia
Article Integrity Crossmark: Check for updates
Article Metrics
149 Article Views 50 PDF Downloads

Abstract

Environmental literacy and student character development are essential to be improved, given the increase in national waste generation to 31.32 million tons by 2024 and the low self-confidence of children, according to the International Women's Day 2022 survey. In addition, preliminary research shows that students have low self-confidence and environmental literacy. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate how effective the environmental values-oriented contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model is in increasing students' knowledge and confidence about biology in secondary school. This research method uses a quasi-experimental approach with a non-equivalent control group design. The experimental class obtained learning using the CTL model that integrated environmental values (ecocentric), while the control class received conventional learning. Data was obtained through environmental literacy tests, validated self-confidence questionnaires, and observation sheets. The reliability of all devices is very high (Cronbach's alpha, α > 0.80). The results of independent t-test samples, correlation analysis, and regression analysis showed that the experimental group obtained significantly higher post-test scores and N-gain values than the control group, both for environmental literacy (N-gain 0.80; high category) and confidence (N-gain 0.74; high category). Regression analysis showed that the environmental value-oriented CTL model contributed 70.3% to the increase. The results of this study show that contextual learning that integrates environmental values not only improves students' conceptual understanding but also enhances their affective aspects. Therefore, the environmental value-oriented CTL model can be an effective pedagogical strategy to help curriculum reform and teacher professional development in increasing environmental awareness and character formation of students.

References

1
[1] N. Tiken20, Y. Erita, R. S. Putri, and Salmiyanti, “Application of Electronic Learning and Educators’ Challenges in the 21st Century,” J. Digit. Learn. Distance Educ., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 355–360, 2023. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i11.63
2
[2] Dairse, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup,” no. Kolisch 1996, pp. 49–56, 2009.
3
[3] S. D. Pangestu, M. H. Al Muhdhar, and S. Sulisetijono, “Analysis of Environmental Literacy Level of Students at MAN 1 Malang City,” Bioedukasi, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 95, 2023. https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v21i2.39619
4
[4] M. L. M, “Environmental Education and Skilling the Students for Future,” Int. J. Res. Publ. Rev., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 162–164, 2024. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0324.0605
5
[5] W. M. Widianingsih, P. Karyanto, B. A. Prayitno, and M. Irawati, “Environmental learning through development of subject specific pedagogy based on problem based learning to reinforce student’s environmental literacy …,” Proceeding Biol. Educ. …, vol. 14, pp. 441–448, 2017.
6
[6] SIPSN, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, “Direktorat Jenderal Pengelolaan Sampah, Limbah dan B3,” 2024.
7
[7] Umna, Indonesia Peringkat Dua Dunia Penyumbang Sampah Plastik, UMN ECO 2024: Akan Ada Karma Buruk, 2024.
8
[8] IQAir, “2024 World Air Quality Report,” Mar. 2025.
9
[9] A. S. Mulyani et al., “Membentuk Generasi Berliterasi Lingkungan Hidup dalam Melestarikan Alam,” Bersama J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 175–191, 2023. https://doi.org/10.61994/bersama.v1i2.437
10
[10] M. Ezimah, “Environmental education: A sustainable development perspective,” Asian J. Educ. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 62–66, 2022. https://doi.org/10.53402/ajet.v1i1.25
11
[11] H. Ghafuri, “The Relationship Between Self-Confidence and Personality Traits in Students,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2025. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-05-01-10
12
[12] A. Driscoll, “Feedback for students and teachers: A powerful pedagogy,” in Transforming Traditional Teaching for Today’s College Students: Strategies for Cultivating Relationships and Community, pp. 187–208, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003445234-8
13
[13] H. E. Ben Messaoud, “A Review on Self-Confidence and How to Improve It,” Glob. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 26–32, 2022. https://doi.org/10.37745/gjhrm.2013/vol10n52632
14
[14] A. Mustofa and Y. Arisandi, “Konsep Percaya Diri Perspektif Al-Qur’an,” Al-Jadwa J. Stud. Islam, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22–43, 2021. https://doi.org/10.38073/aljadwa.v1i1.470
15
[15] R. Watson, H. N. Wilson, P. Smart, et al., “Harnessing difference: A capability-based framework for stakeholder engagement in environmental innovation,” J. Prod. …, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12394
16
[16] D. Malasari, F. Kameliawati, S. Surmiasih, and H. Hardono, “Pengaruh Terapi Psikodrama dalam Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Diri pada Anak Sekolah di SD Negeri 01 Way Halim Permai,” Profesi (Profesional Islam. Media Publ. Penelit.), vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 95–99, 2024. https://doi.org/10.26576/profesi.v21i2.217
17
[17] A. Peña-Ayala, “A learning design cooperative framework to instill 21st century education,” Telemat. Informatics, vol. 62, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101632
18
[18] C. L. Scott, “What Kind of Pedagogies for the 21st Century?,” Int. J. Bus. Educ., vol. 164, no. 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30707/IJBE164.1.1690386168.701806
19
[19] Z. Zidan, M. Maftuhah, D. Yusti, A. A. R. Rahmat, R. Riandi, and K. Kusnadi, “Learning strategies on ecosystem concepts and environmental change: A pedagogical study analysis,” Assim. Indones. J. Biol. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 2023. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v6i2.59777
20
[20] W. Murti, F. Rohman, M. S. Sari, and I. Ibrohim, “Ecoliteracy competencies: A systematic literature review of domains, approaches, and impacts in education,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 21, no. 8, 2025. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16658
21
[21] M.-D. Quintero-Losada, N. A. Martínez-Hernández, Y. Pascuas-Rengifo, and P. J. Aguilar-Cruz, “Ecoliteracy and environmental citizenship: A systematic review of the literature in basic and secondary education,” Entramado, vol. 21, no. 2, 2025. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.12782
22
[22] M. Dresner, C. De Rivera, K. K. Fuccillo, and H. Chang, “Improving higher-order thinking and knowledge retention in environmental science teaching,” Bioscience, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bit005
23
[23] A. Lee, “The importance of cultivating awareness of environmental matters in science classrooms: A cross-regional study,” Aust. J. Environ. Educ., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 467–491, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2023.7
24
[24] E. S. Lestari, S. Sajidan, F. Rahmawati, and M. Indrowati, “The Inquiry Ethnobotany Learning Model: An Instructional Design Model to Enhance Student Environmental Literacy,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 377–389, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.377
25
[25] E. Karahan and G. Roehrig, “Use of Socioscientific Contexts for Promoting Student Agency in Environmental Science Classrooms,” Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 425, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.v5i2.5000145998
26
[26] G. Tasquier, E. Knain, and A. Jornet, “Scientific Literacies for Change Making: Equipping the Young to Tackle Current Societal Challenges,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.689329
27
[27] G. Guerrero and J. Sjöström, “Critical scientific and environmental literacies: A systematic and critical review,” Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 41–87, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2344988
28
[28] I. Kukliansky and H. Eshach, “Evaluating a Contextual-Based Course on Data Analysis for the Physics Laboratory,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 108–115, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9456-6
29
[29] D. A. Kimori and G. Roehrig, “Environmental topics in physics by inquiry course: Integration models used by physics teachers,” Qual. Rep., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1601–1617, 2021. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4401
30
[30] A. Ekantini and I. Damayanti, “Inquiry-Based Environmental Literacy to Improve Environmental Character Care of Elementary School Student,” EduHumaniora | J. Pendidik. Dasar Kampus Cibiru, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 158–168, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v14i2.40529
31
[31] E. Hamilton-Ford and J. D. Herron, “Connecting STEM Rich Learning Environments With Environmental Education,” pp. 213–232, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2503-6.ch012
32
[32] Z. Haoxing and C. System, “Proposed visualizations to integrate twenty-first century skills and social and emotional learning competencies in the light of global trends,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.13935.10400
33
[33] D. Narvaez, “Holistic Moral Education,” Korea Assoc. Public Value, vol. 4, pp. 1–6, 2022. https://doi.org/10.53581/jopv.2022.4.1.1
34
[34] R. Embong, W. M. Wan Yusoff, S. Che Seman, H. A. Hashim, and H. Md Lateh @ Junid, “Holistic Thoughtful Classroom for Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills in the 21st Century Learning,” ICERI2022 Proc., vol. 1, pp. 4718–4725, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.1135
35
[35] A. E. J. Wals, M. Brody, J. Dillon, and R. B. Stevenson, “Convergence Between Science and Environmental Education,” Science, vol. 344, no. 6184, pp. 583–584, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250515
36
[36] S. Samsinar and F. Fitriani, “Character-Based Learning and Self-Development to Improve the Students’ Character Education,” Lentera Pendidik. J. Ilmu Tarb. dan Kegur., vol. 23, no. 1, p. 108, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2020v23n1i10
37
[37] R. Hermawan and S. Kusniasari, “Developing Strong Moral Values: Integrating Value and Character Education in Educational Context,” Int. J. Res. Sci. Innov., vol. X, no. IX, pp. 1–5, 2023. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2023.10901
38
[38] C. K. B. Purba, “Building Moral Character in Students Learning Citizenship Education,” Int. J. Students Educ., pp. 115–118, 2024. https://doi.org/10.62966/ijose.vi.746
39
[39] M. Muhibbuddin, W. Artika, and C. Nurmaliah, “Improving Critical Thinking Skills Through Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-Based Science,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 283–296, 2023. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16417a
40
[40] R. P. Antonio and M. S. Prudente, “Effects of Inquiry-Based Approaches on Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Science: A Meta-Analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 251–281, Oct. 2023. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
41
[41] T. Michalsky, “Metacognitive scaffolding for preservice teachers’ self-regulated design of higher order thinking tasks,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 2, p. e24280, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24280
42
[42] Z. Zhakypova and C. Sydykova, “The Importance of Using Contextual Learning as an Effective Teaching Method,” Alatoo Acad. Stud., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 144–153, 2021. https://doi.org/10.17015/aas.2021.213.16
43
[43] H. M. T. Amrillah, Y. Yulizah, and D. Widiyanti, “Peran Guru dalam Membentuk Karakter Percaya Diri Anak Usia Dini,” J. Literasiologi, vol. 8, no. 3, 2022. https://doi.org/10.47783/literasiologi.v8i3.405

License

Download Article

Downloads

Article Tools

View Issue