Exploring the “Chilly Climate” at an Indian Liberal Arts College: Is There a Thaw?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v3i2.470Keywords:
Chilly climate, Higher education institutions, Critical pedagogies, Liberal arts, Qualitative research, IndiaAbstract
The existence of gendered environments within college classrooms is often referred to as the “chilly climate.” Historically, classrooms and campus climates in many universities have reinforced gender bias against female students. However, higher education institutions that embrace critical pedagogies and liberal arts learning may be able to improve campus climates because these educational practices often emphasize dismantling existing inequities and oppressive structures. Thus, it is meaningful to ask if the transformative learning experiences fostered by critical pedagogies and the liberal arts might help thaw the chilly climate. To explore this possibility, we use student experiences from an Indian higher education institution as a case study. More specifically, we interviewed students who were attending a college in western India that has a long-standing commitment to critical pedagogies and the liberal arts. Findings illustrate that students continue to experience gender bias in their classrooms, even though campus policies and practices explicitly promote social equality and transformative learning spaces. This suggests that embedding critical pedagogies into university vision statements and classroom experiences may not be sufficient to thaw the chilly climate; institutional-level actions that explicitly and concretely target the chilly climate will also be necessary. Implications for higher education policies are discussed.
References
[1] R. Hall and B. Sandler, “The classroom climate: A chilly one for women?,” Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, 1982.
[2] C. P. Serex and B. K. Townsend, “Student perceptions of chilling practices in sex-atypical majors,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 527–538, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018796310985
[3] World Health Organization, “Gender and health,” https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender, 2021.
[4] B. R. Sandler, “The chilly climate: Subtle ways in which women are often treated differently at work and in classrooms,” Women’s Research and Education Institute, pp. 1-7, 1999.
[5] S. Das, O. Borah Hazarika, and S. Pathak, “Everyday sexism in higher education: Narratives of women in Indian academia,” J. Gend. Stud., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 588–599, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2191313
[6] R. Singh, P. Mukherjee, and A. Kumar, “Gender inequality in successful completion of higher education: Evidence from a longitudinal study in India.” Compare, vol. 56, pp. 1-20, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2025.2544504
[7] L. E. Jensen and E. D. Deemer, “Identity, campus climate, and burnout among undergraduate women in STEM fields,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 96–109, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12174
[8] E. T. Pascarella, E. J. Whitt, M. I. Edison, A. Nora, L. S. Hagedorn, P. M. Yeager, et al., “Women’s perceptions of a ‘chilly climate’ and their cognitive outcomes during the first year of college,” J. Coll. Student Dev., vol. 38, pp. 109–124, 1997.
[9] J. Hughes, H. Scott, L. J. Morrison, D. Kotsopoulos, and R. Ruttenberg-Rozen, “Chilly climate 2.0: Women’s experiences of harassment and discrimination in Canadian higher education,” Can. J. Educ., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 472–501, 2023. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5905
[10] C. Putcha, R. K. Elamadurthi, V. Matsaniya, and J. B. Koyye, “Challenges of women in accessing higher education in India.” J. Namibian Studies, vol. 33, pp. 2251-2265, 2023.
[11] M. Crawford and M. MacLeod, “Gender in the college classroom: An assessment of the “chilly climate” for women,” Sex Roles, vol. 23, no. 3-4, pp. 101–122, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289859
[12] J. F. Heller, C. R. Puff, and C. J. Mills, “Assessment of the chilly college climate for women,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 446–461, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1985.11780703
[13] J. J. Lee and J. M. Mccabe, “Who speaks and who listens: Revisiting the chilly climate in college classrooms,” Gend. Soc., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 32–60, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220977141
[14] A. Mukherjee and S. Dasgupta, ““He says, she says”: Sexism and sexual harassment in higher educational institutions of India,” J. Econ. Issues, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 408–415, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2022.2057169
[15] P. Freire, The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 1970.
[16] H. Giroux, Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life: Critical Pedagogy in the Modern Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.
[17] b. hooks, Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. Boston: South End Press, 1989.
[18] G. Katsiampoura, “From critical feminist theory to critical feminist revolutionary pedagogy,” Adv. App. Soc.,14, 175-185, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2024.144012
[19] H. W. Hackman, “Five essential components for social justice education,” Equity Excell. Educ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 103–109, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680590935034
[20] J. Mezirow, “Transformative learning: Theory to practice,” New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ., vol. 1997, no. 74, pp. 5–12, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
[21] T. Kim and D. Kim, “Chilly climate perceived by female engineering undergraduates: An exploratory study using concept mapping,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, p. 1145795, Jun. 2 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145795
[22] E. E. Griffith, E. L. Mickey, and N. A. Dasgupta, “’Chillier’ Climate for Multiply Marginalized STEM Faculty Impedes Research Collaboration,” Sex Roles, vol. 86, no. 3-4, pp. 233–248, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01259-w
[23] F. W. Khan and M. Imad, “Cultural practices and chilly university environment for female students: A case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan,” Transact. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 101–107, 2021.
[24] H. Qureshi, T. C. Kulig, F. T. Cullen, and B. S. Fisher, “Rape myth acceptance among college students in India: Prevalence and predictors in a changing context,” Deviant Behav., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1043–1066, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1720935
[25] D. Chowdhury, “Making higher education institutions gender-sensitive,” in Leading Change in Gender and Diversity in Higher Education from Margins to Mainstream, New York, Routledge, pp. 239-258, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003286943-19
[26] K. Sahai, T. Ray, and A. R. Chaudhuri, “What CAN(NOT) explain the gap? Evidence and decomposition of gendered stream choice in India,” Jindal School of Government and Public Policy, pp 1-48, 2022. https://doi.org/10.54945/preserve.10
[27] R. Rincon, R. M. Korn, and J. C. Williams, “Examining gender bias in engineering in India.” Paper presented at 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.
[28] K. Chanana, “Women in Indian academe: Diversity, difference and inequality in contested domain,” J. Indian Educ., vol. 34, pp. 5–18, 2008.
[29] A. Tambe, A. “(Hyper)Visible ‘women’/invisible (Dalit) women: Challenging the elusive sexism in Indian universities,” in Strategies for Resisting Sexism in the Academy, pp. 129-149, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04852-5_8
[30] J. de Saxe, Critical Feminism and Critical Education. New York: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315651651
[31] J. Kincheloe, Knowledge and Critical Pedagogy. New York: Springer, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8224-5
[32] L. A. Paul and J. Quiggin, “Transformative education,” Educ. Theory, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 561–579, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12444
[33] J. Dadds, “Feminisms: Embodying the critical,” in Beyond Critique: Exploring Critical Social Theories and Education, Boston: Paradigm Publishers, pp. 171–196, 2011.
[34] P. Haber-Curran and D. W. Tillapaugh, “Student-Centered Transformative Learning in Leadership Education: An Examination of the Teaching and Learning Process,” J. Transform. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 65–84, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614559947
[35] A. B. Henderson and E. Kose, “The role of course-based undergraduate research experiences in extending transformative learning to all students,” J. Transform. Learn., vol. 5, pp. 49–59, 2018.
[36] C. Cooper, “Critical pedagogy in higher education,” in Socially Just, Radical Alternatives for Education and Youth Work Practice, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137393593
[37] P. M. King, M. K. Brown, N. K. Lindsay, and J. R. VanHecke, “Liberal arts student learning outcomes: An integrated approach,” About Campus, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2–9, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.222
[38] R. Simmons, “Liberal studies and critical pedagogy in further education colleges: “Where their eyes would be opened” (sometimes),” Oxf. Rev. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 692–706, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1226790
[39] U. Narain, “Academic Leadership in India: The Case of Liberal Arts Education,” Bus. Manage. Rev., vol. 10, pp. 5–13, 2018.
[40] K. Mondschein, “Liberal arts for social change,” Humanities, vol. 9, pp. 1–14, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9030098
[41] S. Pal, P. Sarkar, and S. Bhattacharya, “Liberal education implication as per NPE 2020 and its implication to solve tribal educational issues in India,” Int. J. Res. Cul. Society, vol. 6, pp. 64–69, 2022.
[42] C. S. Brinkworth, “From chilly climate to warm reception: Experiences and good practices for supporting LGBTQ students in STEM,” Claremont College, 2016.
[43] H. V. Gaikwad, S. Kulkarni, and S. Pandey, “Enhancing Academic Performances of Women Undergraduates in Engineering Through Cultural Interventions,” J. Engineer. Educ. Transform., vol. 33, no. 0, pp. 265–269, 2020. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/151582
[44] M. Neal, “Warming up Higher Education’s Chilly Climate: A Model for Supporting Adult Female Learners,” American Association for Adult and Continuing Education, pp. 98-103, 2023.
[45] G. M. Walton, C. Logel, J. M. Peach, S. J. Spencer, and M. P. Zanna, “Two brief interventions to mitigate a ‘chilly climate’ to transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 468–485, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037461
[46] T. Mino, “Building a liberal arts tradition in India.” Rev. Esp. Educ. Comp., vol. 39, pp. 123–137, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.39.2021.30042
[47] K. V. Rao, “Sculpting the universities of future: The Indian ways,” in Reimagining Indian Universities, New Delhi, India: Association of Indian Universities, pp. 1–15, 2020.
[48] Government of India, “National Education Policy 2020,” https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf, 2020.
[49] R. Bajpai, Debating Difference: Group Rights and Liberal Democracy in India. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198067504.001.0001
[50] S. Banerjee and N. Ghosh, “Debating intersectionalities: Challenges for a methodological framework,” S. Asia Multidis. Acad. J., vol. 19, pp. 1–17, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.4745
[51] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2018.
[52] R. E. Stake, The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1995.
[53] K. Charmaz, Constructing Grounded Theory, London, Sage, 2014.
[54] J. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1998.
[55] N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1998.
[56] J. Morse, Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1994.
[57] A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1998.
[58] C. Ragin, The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Oakland, University of California Press, 1987.
[59] D. M. Gordon, S. W. Hawes, A. E. Reid, T. A. Callands, U. Magriples, A. Divney, et al., “The many faces of manhood: Examining masculine norms and health behaviors of young fathers across race,” Am. J. Mens Health, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 394–401, Sep. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988313476540
[60] C. Leaper and C. Friedman, “The socialization of gender,” in Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research, New York: Guilford Publications, 2007.
[61] J. T. Jost and M. R. Banaji, “The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness,” Br. J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
[62] J. T. Jost and J. van der Toorn, “System justification theory,” in Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2012.
[63] J. T. Jost, M. R. Banaji, and B. A. Nosek, “A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo,” Polit. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 881–919, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
[64] M. Holtzman, “Lowering the risk of sexual assault: What campuses need to know about effective prevention programming,” Change, vol. 51, pp. 28–33, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2019.1606586
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jui Shankar, Aashna Banerjee, Mellisa Holtzman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.