Developing Public-Speaking Agency Through Muhadharah: An Exploratory Study of Female Students in an Indonesian Islamic Boarding School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v3i3.659Keywords:
Female Boarding Students, Islamic Boarding School, Muhadharah, Public-Speaking AgencyAbstract
This study aims to explore how Muhadharah, a structured religious public-speaking program, develops public-speaking agency among female students in an Indonesian Islamic boarding school. Using a qualitative institutional case-study design, data were drawn from three role-specific semi-structured interviews with the boarding-school leader, a female Muhadharah advisor, and one participating student. Interview data were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis and role-based comparison. The findings reveal an institutional performance cycle consisting of protected weekly scheduling, rotating communicative roles, script preparation, peer-mentor support, repeated rehearsal, live delivery, collective feedback, and recognition. The student described a gradual transition from fear and embarrassment toward stronger confidence, clearer delivery, improved intonation, and greater responsibility. Program continuity was constrained by memorization demands, anxiety, limited time, competing activities, weather, and power interruptions, but was supported through group rotation, mentor assistance, alternative venues, portable lighting, and reward-based reinforcement. The study positions Muhadharah as a gender-responsive support system rather than merely a speech-training activity. It recommends a staged progression from full scripts to outline-based speaking, rubric-guided formative feedback, and protected low-stakes performance opportunities.
References
[1] A. Prasetyo, G. Hazmin, M. Muchran, and G. S. Nugroho, “Meningkatkan keterampilan public speaking untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi di depan umum,” International Journal of Community Service Learning, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 192–198, 2023. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijcsl.v7i2.51633
[2] A. Harahap, “Strategi pondok pesantren dalam membina kader dai di Kabupaten Padang Lawas Sumatera Utara,” Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 19–35, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v21i2.6832
[3] Y. Maulana, A. Salim, and A. Mukmin, “Peran muhadharah dalam meningkatkan kualitas public speaking santri Pondok Pesantren Al-Azhaar Lubuklinggau dalam berdakwah di masyarakat,” Al-Idaroh: Media Pemikiran Manajemen Dakwah, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 66–73, 2024. https://doi.org/10.53888/alidaroh.v3i2.657
[4] S. Ratinah, E. Purwandari, E. Rochmansyah, and D. Putri, “Implementasi manajemen dakwah dalam mengembangkan keterampilan santri pada grup Muhadhoroh di Pondok Pesantren Riyadhul,” AL-MUTSLA, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 567–595, 2025. https://doi.org/10.46870/jstain.v7i2.1776
[5] M. Sahtriani and Mutiawati, “Penerapan prinsip manajemen dakwah dalam meningkatkan kualitas Muhadhoroh di Pondok Pesantren Tahfiz Qur’an dan Hadist Al Faiz,” AL-MUTSLA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 399–421, 2025. https://doi.org/10.46870/jstain.v7i1.1724
[6] Y. Syifani, I. Fauji, and N. Murshidah, “Penerapan pembelajaran maharah kalam di Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Malaysia,” Jurnal Naskhi: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Bahasa Arab, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2025. https://doi.org/10.47435/naskhi.v7i1.3369
[7] Q. A. Yuyun, M. Bakhruddin, and Mulyono, “Penguatan akhlak melalui kegiatan muhadharah di Pondok Pesantren Entrepreneur Muhammadiyah,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 189–199, 2023. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.2023.vol8(2).12038
[8] H. H. M. Elahemer and S. B. H. Mat Said, “A systematic review of interventions used to reduce university students’ speaking anxiety,” International Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 128–149, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i2.2994
[9] S. Demir and M. O. Kan, “Developing the public speaking anxiety scale for adolescents: The mediating role of dysfunctional emotion regulation in the effect of irrational beliefs on public speaking anxiety,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 15, no. 6, Art. no. 825, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060825
[10] A. A. Hayat, K. Shateri, M. Amini, and N. Shokrpour, “Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 20, Art. no. 76, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9
[11] M. H. A. Al-Abyadh and H. A. H. Abdel Azeem, “Academic achievement: Influences of university students’ self-management and perceived self-efficacy,” Journal of Intelligence, vol. 10, no. 3, Art. no. 55, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030055
[12] L. Anthonysamy, A. C. Koo, and S. H. Hew, “Self-regulated learning strategies in higher education: Fostering digital literacy for sustainable lifelong learning,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 25, pp. 2393–2414, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10201-8
[13] B. Wisniewski, K. Zierer, and J. Hattie, “The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, Art. no. 3087, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
[14] H.-T. Hoo, C. Deneen, and D. Boud, “Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 444–457, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1925871
[15] L. Ketonen, P. Nieminen, and M. Hähkiöniemi, “The development of secondary students’ feedback literacy: Peer assessment as an intervention,” The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 407–417, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1835794
[16] K. S. Double, J. A. McGrane, and T. N. Hopfenbeck, “The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 32, pp. 481–509, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
[17] M. Vaughn, “What is student agency and why is it needed now more than ever?,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 109–118, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702393
[18] J. L. Howard, J. Bureau, F. Guay, J. X. Y. Chong, and R. M. Ryan, “Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1300–1323, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
[19] J. Camacho-Morles et al., “Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 33, pp. 1051–1095, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3
[20] D. Lombardi et al., “The curious construct of active learning,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 8–43, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
[21] E. J. Theobald et al., “Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476–6483, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
[22] A. R. Quisumbing et al., “Measuring women’s empowerment in agriculture: Innovations and evidence,” Global Food Security, vol. 38, Art. no. 100707, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100707
[23] L. Doyle, C. McCabe, B. Keogh, A. Brady, and M. McCann, “An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research,” Journal of Research in Nursing, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 443–455, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234
[24] A. Priya, “Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes and navigating the conundrums in its application,” Sociological Bulletin, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 94–110, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
[25] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 328–352, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
[26] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis,” Qualitative Psychology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–26, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
[27] D. Byrne, “A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis,” Quality & Quantity, vol. 56, pp. 1391–1412, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
[28] K. Proudfoot, “Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research,” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 17, no. 3, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
[29] M. Hennink and B. N. Kaiser, “Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 292, Art. no. 114523, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
[30] G. Guest, E. Namey, and M. Chen, “A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research,” PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 5, Art. no. e0232076, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
[31] L. Varpio, A. A. Ajjawi, L. V. Monrouxe, B. C. O’Brien, and C. E. Rees, “Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131,” Medical Teacher, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 846–854, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
[32] F. M. Olmos-Vega, R. E. Stalmeijer, L. Varpio, and R. Kahlke, “A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149,” Medical Teacher, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 241–251, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Era Sapitri, Rina Juliana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.