Gender Protection in the Legal Systems of Malaysia and ‎Indonesia: A Normative Analysis and Human Rights Based Policy ‎Implementation

Gender Protection in the Legal Systems of Malaysia and ‎Indonesia: A Normative Analysis and Human Rights Based Policy ‎Implementation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70211/gils.v1i1.380

Keywords:

Comparative Analysis, Gender Protection, Human Rights, Indonesia, Malaysia

Abstract

The gender protection regimes in Malaysia and Indonesia through a comparative normative juridical framework, with particular attention to constitutional foundations, legislative architecture, and the internalization of international human rights norms. The research is grounded in the premise that formal commitments to gender equality do not automatically translate into substantive protection, especially within plural and decentralized legal systems. Using a doctrinal and comparative legal approach, the study analyzes primary legal sources including constitutional provisions, statutory instruments, and relevant international conventions such as CEDAW alongside secondary academic literature to assess the coherence, harmonization, and implementation capacity of gender-related legal frameworks in both jurisdictions. The findings reveal that while both countries have adopted significant sectoral reforms addressing gender-based violence and discrimination, structural differences in legal system design substantially influence normative integration and enforcement. Malaysia’s dual civil Sharia legal system reflects institutionalized legal pluralism that may generate jurisdictional fragmentation and partial harmonization of gender norms, whereas Indonesia’s relatively integrated constitutional structure supports stronger normative coherence but faces implementation challenges due to decentralization and uneven regional capacity. The study concludes that the effectiveness of gender protection is contingent not merely upon progressive legislation but upon the structural alignment between constitutional principles, statutory frameworks, and institutional coordination mechanisms. These findings carry important theoretical and policy implications, suggesting that future gender law reforms in plural legal systems should prioritize systemic coherence, inter-jurisdictional harmonization, and strengthened governance capacity to ensure the substantive realization of gender equality.

References

‎[1]‎ C. Chambers, “Making Inequality Visible Without Making it Worse,” Soc. Philos. ‎Policy, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 122–146, Dec. 2022, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052523000249.‎

‎[2] ‎ R. Nunes, G. Rego, H. Melo, S. B. Nunes, and I. Duarte, Eds., Perspectives on Gender ‎Equality, MDPI, 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-7258-2571-4.‎

‎[3] ‎ I. Qureshi, B. Bhatt, and S. Shaikh, “Empowering Marginalized Communities: A ‎Framework for Social Inclusion,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1197–1221, ‎‎2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00928.‎

‎[4] ‎ M. Mayrhofer, “The concept of vulnerability and its relation to the concepts of ‎inequality and discrimination – a review article,” Int. J. Hum. Rights, vol. 29, no. 9, ‎pp. 1589–1618, Oct. 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2025.2488938.‎

‎[5] ‎ E. Lwamba et al., “Strengthening women’s empowerment and gender equality in ‎fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and ‎meta‐analysis,” Campbell Syst. Rev., vol. 18, no. 1, Mar. 2022, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1214.‎

‎[6] ‎ A. von Bogdandy, F. Piovesan, E. Ferrer Mac-Gregor, and M. Morales Antoniazzi, ‎Eds., The Impact of the Inter-American Human Rights System, Oxford University ‎Press, 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197744161.001.0001.‎

‎[7] ‎ A. Joshi, “Legal Empowerment and Social Accountability: Complementary Strategies ‎Toward Rights-based Development in Health?,” World Dev., vol. 99, pp. 160–172, ‎Nov. 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.008.‎

‎[8] ‎ OECD, “Ending gender-based discriminations in G20 countries: A frame for action,” ‎Oecd, 2021.‎

‎[9] ‎ SIGI 2024 Regional Report for Southeast Asia, in Social Institutions and Gender ‎Index, OECD Publishing, 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/7fc15e1c-en.‎

‎[10] ‎ T. Horbachevska, O. Uvarova, and D. Vovk, “Freedom of Religion and Non-‎discrimination Based on Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation in Ukraine: ‎Corporate Policy Commitments in Situations of Conflicting Social Expectations,” ‎Hum. Rights Rev., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 205–231, Jun. 2024, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-024-00720-z.‎

‎[11] ‎ M. S. Maulana, “The Politics of Religious Recognition: A Comparative Study of ‎Modern Government Policies in Indonesia and Turkey,” J. Law, Polit. Humanit., vol. ‎‎6, no. 1, pp. 148–156, Oct. 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2435.‎

‎[12] ‎ M. Ozkan, “How Religion Shapes Foreign Policy? An Explanatory Model for Non-‎Western States,” Religions, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 617, Aug. 2021, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080617.‎

‎[13] ‎ R. Ainsworth and S. P. Hickey, Constitutions, Customary and Religious Law, and ‎Gender Equality: Reconciling Rights in Constitutional Design Negotiations, ‎International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), ‎‎2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2022.48.‎

‎[14] ‎ S. Westwood, “Religious‐based negative attitudes towards LGBTQ people among ‎healthcare, social care and social work students and professionals: A review of the ‎international literature,” Health Soc. Care Community, vol. 30, no. 5, Sep. 2022, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13812.‎

‎[15] ‎ T. H. Hududillah, S. Nikmah, F. Hamdi, and T. Agape Bawana, “Reconstructing ‎Islamic Family Law in ASEAN: A Normative Analysis of Marriage, Divorce, and ‎Inheritance in Plural Legal Systems,” ASEAN J. Islam. Stud. Civiliz. (AJISC), vol. 02, ‎no. 2, pp. 183–210, 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.62976/ajisc.v1i1.1427.‎

‎[16] ‎ M. A. bin Abdullah, “Analyzing the Dynamics Between Sharia Law and Civil Law in ‎Governing Divorce Proceedings Among Muslims in Malaysia and Comparing Legal ‎Outcomes,” Law Econ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 29–38, Apr. 2024, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.56397/LE.2024.04.05.‎

‎[17] ‎ Youcha Alassane Touré, Mohammed Hafiz Ali Wafa, Aris Munandar, Sarkanto, ‎Nasih Muhammad, and Mohammad Abdul Munjid, “Recognition of the constitution, ‎laws and regulations, customary law, and islamic law in the Indonesian and Malaysian ‎legal systems,” Amorti J. Stud. Islam Interdisip., pp. 151–160, Oct. 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.59944/amorti.v4i4.558.‎

‎[18] ‎ L. T. A. L. Wardhani, M. D. H. Noho, and A. Natalis, “The adoption of various legal ‎systems in Indonesia: an effort to initiate the prismatic Mixed Legal Systems,” Cogent ‎Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2022, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2104710.‎

‎[19] ‎ I. Istikhomah and D. Febriawanti, “Ensuring Equality of Political Rights for Persons ‎with Disabilities from a Human Rights Perspective,” Widya Yuridika, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. ‎‎725–738, 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v8i3.7042.‎

‎[20] ‎ J. Beaujouan, "Power Peace: The Resolution of the Syrian Conflict in a Post-Liberal ‎Era of Peacemaking," Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. ‎‎309-328, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2024.2371713.‎

‎[21] ‎ V. Fikfak and L. Izvorova, “Language and Persuasion: Human Dignity at the ‎European Court of Human Rights,” Hum. Rights Law Rev., vol. 22, no. 3, Jun. 2022, ‎DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac018.‎

‎[22] ‎ M. O. F. Women and C. Development, “Action Malaysia Progress,” 2024.‎

‎[23] ‎ H. H. Arief, “Sexual Harassment: Legal Protection Against Workers in Malaysia,” Al-‎Adl J. Huk., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 135, Jul. 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31602/al-‎adl.v9i1.806.‎

‎[24] ‎ A. A. Rohime, M. Nasrun, and N. A. Aziz, “Assessing the Anti-Sexual Harassment ‎Act 2022: Progress, Pitfalls, and the Path toward Effective Enforcement,” Int. J. Res. ‎Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 5409–5416, Nov. 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000440.‎

‎[25] ‎ M. Zaenuddin, “How to Achieve the Integration From the Dualism of Institutional ‎Conflicts? Lesson Learned From Batam, Indonesia,” SAGE Open, vol. 15, no. 3, Jan. ‎‎2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251365467.‎

‎[26] ‎ J. S. Gordon, “Comparative judicial federalism,” Int. J. Const. Law, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. ‎‎976–1010, Dec. 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad081.‎

‎[27] ‎ F. Coppola, “The brain in solitude: an (other) eighth amendment challenge to solitary ‎confinement,” J. Law Biosci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 184–225, Oct. 2019, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz014.‎

‎[28] ‎ C. Scholtz and A. Munteanu, “How cooperative is ‘cooperative federalism’? The ‎political limits to intergovernmental cooperation under a de facto concurrency rule,” ‎Const. Polit. Econ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 111–134, Mar. 2023, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-022-09364-y.‎

‎[29] ‎ H. Arief, “Legal Protection Against Women Victims by The Indonesian Domestic ‎Violence Act 23, 2004,” Sriwij. Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 110, Jan. 2017, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol1.Iss1.12.pp110-121.‎

‎[30] ‎ E. D. Lestari, A. A. S. G S, and R. S. Noor, “Sexual Violence Crimes and Legal ‎Protection for Victims: Law Number 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes and the ‎Reality of Handling Sexual Violence Cases in Indonesia,” J. Law, Polit. Humanit., ‎vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 4683–4694, 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2196.‎

‎[31] ‎ M. Mutiara and Syofiaty Lubis, “Implementation of Law No. 23 of 2004 on the ‎Elimination of Domestic Violence Domestic Violence (PKDRT) in the Province of ‎North Sumatra,” J. Law, Polit. Humanit., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 221–226, Mar. 2024, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.333.‎

‎[32] ‎ Z. S. Zuwanda and A. Triyantoro, “The Role of Law of the Republic of Indonesia ‎Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes in Handling Cases of Gender-‎Based Violence in Indonesia,” West Sci. Law Hum. Rights, vol. 2, no. 04, pp. 412–‎‎420, Oct. 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v2i04.1365.‎

‎[33] ‎ A. Widjiastuti and N. D. Kartiko, “Confronting Gender-Based Violence: The State’s ‎Accountability in Safeguarding Women and Children’s Human Rights,” J. Law, Adm. ‎Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2a, pp. 348–364, Dec. 2023, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v3i2a.612.‎

‎[34] ‎ C. A. Davidson, T. Mantler, and K. T. Jackson, “Gender-Based Violence and ‎‎2SLGBTQI+ Groups,” Societies, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 242, Nov. 2024, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14110242.‎

‎[35] ‎ M. Lokot et al., “Decolonising the field of violence against women and girls: A ‎scoping review and recommendations for research and programming,” Soc. Sci. Med., ‎vol. 357, p. 117168, Sep. 2024, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117168.‎

‎[36] ‎ S. Koo, “Exploring the links between patriarchy, informal networks, and corruption ‎tolerance: Evidence from Kazakhstan,” Womens. Stud. Int. Forum, vol. 114, p. ‎‎103213, Jan. 2026, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103213.‎

‎[37] ‎ Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and Girls, OECD Publishing, 2022, ‎DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/0bddfa8f-en.‎

‎[38] ‎ M. A. Alam and P. C. Roy, “Sexual Violence,” in The Sage International ‎Encyclopedia of Politics and Gender, 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California ‎‎91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071918494.n314.‎

‎[39] ‎ OECD, OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Indonesia 2020, OECD Publishing, 2020, ‎DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/b56512da-en.‎

‎[40] ‎ Seema Gul, Riaz Ahmad, and Dr. Sami Ur Rahman, “Constitutional Dualities: ‎Reconciling Islamic Normativity with Common Law Principles in Hybrid Legal ‎Systems,” Indus J. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 674–693, May 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i2.1501.‎

‎[41] ‎ Triwahyuningsih, M. Waeno, and B. S. Nugraha, “Decentralisation in Regional ‎Governance Law: The Paradox and Non-Functionality of Indigenous Rights and ‎Environmental Protection in Indonesia,” J. Law, Environ. Justice, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. ‎‎739–744, Jan. 2026, DOI: https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v3i3.211.‎

‎[42] ‎ M. M. Mukhlis, Maskun, M. S. Tajuddin, D. Andriani, R. Muchtasar, and A. Masum, ‎‎“Regional Government Autonomy In Indonesia: The Ambiguity Of The Federalism ‎Or Republic Model,” Malaysian J. Syariah Law, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35–57, Mar. 2025, ‎DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol13no1.760.‎

‎[43] ‎ T. Triwahyuningsih, Islahuddin, and D. Putranti, “Asymmetric Decentralization in a ‎Unitary State: Lessons from Pattani, Thailand,” J. Hum. Rights, Cult. Leg. Syst., vol. ‎‎5, no. 3, pp. 897–921, Dec. 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i3.602.‎

‎[44] ‎ J. Radtke and O. Renn, “Participation in Energy Transitions: A Comparison of Policy ‎Styles,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 118, p. 103743, Dec. 2024, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103743.‎

‎[45] Joining Forces for Gender Equality, OECD Publishing, 2023, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1787/67d48024-en.‎

‎[46] ‎ ‎“The Utility of Human Rights Mechanisms in the ASEAN Region,” in Can ASEAN ‎Take Human Rights Seriously?, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 170–273, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108566414.005.‎

‎[47] ‎ M. Davinić, E. Kristoffersson, and T. Marinković, “Gender Equality Aspects of Public ‎Law,” 2023, pp. 305–340, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14360-1_9.‎

‎[48] ‎ K. Goesel, “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against ‎Women (CEDAW),” Women’s Rights United States [4 Vol. A Compr. Encycl. Issues, ‎Events, People [4 Vol.], vol. 15790, no. October, p. Vol3:63-Vol3:64, 2014, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.18356/52e45941-en.‎

‎[49] ‎ Z. Khamzina, Y. Buribayev, B. Taitorina, A. Yessengazieva, and A. Kuttygalieva, ‎‎“Towards Nondiscrimination and Gender Equality: The Role of International Labor ‎Standards,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 5349, Apr. 2022, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095349.‎

‎[50] ‎ Women in Public Life, OECD, 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264224636-en.‎

‎[51] ‎ S. Iqbal, Yusuf Sani Abubakr, and Seeni Mohamed Mohamed Nafees, “Gender ‎Beyond Binary: Inheritance Rights of Third Gender in Islamic Law—Sri Lankan ‎Legal Recognition and Reform,” Indones. J. Islam. Law, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 142–167, ‎Dec. 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.35719/5fnmdq24.‎

‎[52] ‎ L. Azoulai, “European society and its law: EU law in light of social theory,” Eur. Law ‎Open, pp. 1–28, Dec. 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2025.10039.‎

‎[53] ‎ M. A. Rafiq, M. A. B. Chandia, A. A. Jutt, and A. Istafa, “Mapping Legal Pluralism in ‎Two Asian Jurisdictions: A Comparative Study of Pakistan and Singapore,” Pakistan ‎J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 503–516, Jun. 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2025.v13i2.2906.‎

‎[54] ‎ International Political Science Abstracts, Int. Polit. Sci. Abstr., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. ‎‎759–937, Dec. 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020834520978710.‎

‎[55] ‎ S. A. Dewi, A. Uwiyono, and R. Saleh, “A Juridical Study of Constitutional Court ‎Decision No. 58/PUU-VIII/2010 on the Right to Education and Non-Discrimination in ‎Indonesia,” Easta J. Law Hum. Rights, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 43–51, 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v4i01.781.‎

‎[56] ‎ M. I. Syabani Korompot, S. Al-Fatih, and D. Pradhan, “The Principle of Equality ‎Before the Law in Indonesian Corruption Case: Is It Relevant?,” J. Hum. Rights, Cult. ‎Leg. Syst., vol. 1, no. 3, Nov. 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i3.13.‎

‎[57] ‎ C. S. Pratiwi, “Rethinking the Constitutionality of Indonesia’s Flawed Anti-‎Blasphemy Law,” Const. Rev., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 273, Dec. 2021, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev724.‎

‎[58] ‎ Women’s Economic Empowerment in Selected MENA Countries, in Competitiveness ‎and Private Sector Development, OECD, 2017, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279322-en.‎

‎[59] ‎ B. Suranto et al., “State of digitalization in the Southeast Asia region – bibliometric ‎analysis,” Qual. Quant., Jul. 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02296-3.‎

‎[60] ‎ A. H. A. Taufiqurrohman, D. E. Wibowo, and O. Victoria, “The Regulation on Sexual ‎Harassment in ASEAN Workers: Evidence from Several Countries,” J. Hum. Rights, ‎Cult. Leg. Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 538–568, 2024, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i2.198.‎

‎[61] ‎ A. Akisheva, “Questions of harmonization with international legal and policy ‎standards on violence against women and girls in Central Asia,” Int. J. Discrim. Law, ‎vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 70–102, Mar. 2026, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1177/13582291251327140.‎

‎[62] ‎ E. Bermúdez Figueroa, V. Dabetić, R. P. Yuste, and Z. Saeidzadeh, “Gender and ‎Structural Inequalities from a Socio-Legal Perspective,” 2023, pp. 95–142, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14360-1_4.‎

‎[63] ‎ R. Letschert and J. van Dijk, Eds., The New Faces of Victimhood, vol. 8, in Studies in ‎Global Justice, vol. 8, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9020-1.‎

‎[64] ‎ J. M. Grau, “Retracted Article: When Reparation Goes Beyond Punishment: Victims ‎of LGBTQphobic Violence and Retributive and Restorative Justice in Spain,” J. ‎Homosex., vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 2287–2303, Sep. 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2414309.‎

‎[65] ‎ A. M. Nascimento, J. Andrade, and A. de Castro Rodrigues, “The Psychological ‎Impact of Restorative Justice Practices on Victims of Crimes—a Systematic Review,” ‎Trauma, Violence, Abus., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1929–1947, Jul. 2023, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082085.‎

‎[66] ‎ H. Decker, R. Combs, K. Lorenz, L. Harris, and M. Wendel, “‘He went to jail. But Is ‎That Justice?’ Sexual Violence Survivors’ Perspectives on Justice, Accountability, ‎and Repairing Sexual Harm,” J. Interpers. Violence, Jul. 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251355614.‎

‎[67] ‎ M. A. dos R. Cardillo and L. F. C. Basso, “Revisiting knowledge on ESG/CSR and ‎financial performance: A bibliometric and systematic review of moderating ‎variables,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 100648, Jan. 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100648.‎

‎[68] ‎ Cultural Anthropology, Abstr. Anthropol., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 424–599, Apr. 2015, ‎DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001345515584552.‎

‎[69]‎ ‎ OECD, Contributions to the 2030 Agenda and Beyond, OECD Publishing, 2024, ‎DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/69c94bd4-en.‎

‎[70] ‎ I. J. Damieibi, “Moderating Effect of Information and Communication Technology on ‎Internal Audit Practices and Public Expenditure Management of Government ‎Organizations in Nigeria,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 06, no. 05, pp. 01–08, ‎‎2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2022.6501.‎

‎[71] ‎ K. U. Noer, S. Chadijah, and E. Rudiatin, “There is no trustable data: the state and ‎data accuracy of violence against women in Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 12, p. ‎e08552, Dec. 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08552.‎

‎[72] ‎ L. M. Fathun and T. P. Maharani, “Establishment of the ASEAN Action Plan ‎Convention Against Trafficking in Persons (Women and Children) in Indonesia,” ‎‎2025, pp. 1–22, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8001-7_44-1.‎

‎[73] ‎ S. D. Arifiani, S. A. Handayani, M. Baumont, C. Bennouna, and S. Kusumaningrum, ‎‎“Assessing large-scale violence against children surveys in selected Southeast Asian ‎countries: A scoping review,” Child Abuse Negl., vol. 93, pp. 149–161, Jul. 2019, ‎DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.05.005.‎

‎[74] ‎ N. J. Wilson, L. M. Harris, J. Nelson, and S. H. Shah, “Re-Theorizing Politics in ‎Water Governance,” Water, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1470, Jul. 2019, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071470.‎

‎[75] ‎ T. C. Burr, Societies Past and Present, in Emerging Globalities and Civilizational ‎Perspectives, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91532-1.‎

‎[76]‎ The Pursuit of Gender Equality, OECD, 2017, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281318-en.‎

‎[77] ‎ E. Herrfahrdt-Pähle, M. Schlüter, P. Olsson, C. Folke, S. Gelcich, and C. Pahl-Wostl, ‎‎“Sustainability transformations: socio-political shocks as opportunities for governance ‎transitions,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 63, p. 102097, Jul. 2020, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102097.‎

‎[78] ‎ Equitable Framework and Finance for Extractive-based Countries in Transition ‎‎(EFFECT), in OECD Development Policy Tools, OECD Publishing, 2022, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1787/7871c0ad-en.‎

‎[79] ‎ S. Devina Hutagalung, D. P. Ananda Sitompul, K. Priskila Sinaga, S. P. Berutu, and F. ‎Hukum, “Analysis of legal protection of women’s human rights in Indonesia,” ‎Ijobsor, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 316–325, 2023. Available: www.ijobsor.pelnus.ac.id.‎

‎[80] ‎ H. Worthen, C. Curiel, and F. Bailón Vásquez, “Institutional resistance and feminist ‎activism in creating a gender-based violence protocol at a Mexican university,” BMC ‎Glob. Public Heal., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 82, Sep. 2025, DOI: ‎https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00200-7.‎

‎[81] ‎ M. Szołtysek, B. Ogórek, M. Grzyb, and S. Gruber, “The Patriarchy Index for Asia: A ‎new tool for subnational analysis of gender inequalities,” PLoS One, vol. 21, no. 1, p. ‎e0339587, Jan. 2026, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339587.‎

‎[82] ‎ A. S. Runyan and R. Sanders, “Prospects for Realizing International Women’s Rights ‎Law Through Local Governance: The Case of Cities for CEDAW,” Hum. Rights Rev., ‎vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 303–325, Sep. 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-‎‎00635-z.‎

‎[83] ‎ D. Badell and E. Barbé, “The European Union and the Fragmentation of the ‎International Human Rights Regime: The Case of Violence Against Women,” 2025, ‎pp. 85–116, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64060-5_4.‎

‎[84] ‎ M. Evola, J. Jungfleisch, and T. Marinković, “Human Rights Law Through the Lens ‎of the Gender Perspective,” 2023, pp. 217–260, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-‎‎031-14360-1_7.‎

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28
Loading...