Pembelajaran Berbasis Kearifan Lokal dan Berpikir Reflektif Peserta Didik: Audit Korpus dan Sintesis Bukti Sensitif-Konstruk
Abstract
Reflective thinking requires learners to examine experience, justify decisions, and revise understanding, yet evidence on local-wisdom-based learning often combines reflective thinking with adjacent constructs such as critical thinking, creativity, literacy, and achievement. This study presents a construct-sensitive audit and structured narrative synthesis of a previously assembled 2022–2026 corpus. The available corpus contains 20 reports, but the original source-specific search counts, final search date, deduplication log, and stage-specific exclusion reasons were not retained; therefore, the identification stage is not reconstructed as a reproducible de novo systematic review. All 20 reports were reclassified using explicit construct-alignment rules into two direct-evidence studies, nine related-evidence journal articles, eight contextual reflective-thinking studies, and one conference-series protocol deviation. The two direct studies reported favorable developmental or application results, but both designs limit causal inference. Across related evidence, local wisdom most consistently operated as an authentic problem source, cultural frame, or contextual learning resource, whereas contextual reflective-thinking studies showed both positive and non-significant findings. The synthesis therefore supports a cautious proposition: local wisdom may facilitate reflective learning when cultural experience is explicitly connected to metacognitive prompts, justification, and reflective assessment, but current evidence is preliminary rather than conclusive. Because the original screening audit trail and formal risk-of-bias records are unavailable, the study should be interpreted as a transparent corpus audit and evidence synthesis. Future research should use preregistered protocols, reproducible search logs, independent screening, design-appropriate appraisal, and construct-specific outcomes.
References
1
D. Kember et al., “Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 381–395, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
2
C. Rodgers, “Defining Reflection: Another Look at John Dewey and Reflective Thinking,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 842–866, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
3
OECD, TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
4
S. H. Syafiulia, S. M. W. Aji, and J. S. De Side, “Integrating Indigenous Learning through an Ethnopedagogical Perspective in Elementary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review,” EduStream J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2025. https://doi.org/10.26740/eds.v9n1.p27-36
5
D. Mardani, I. Susiawati, I. Humaeroh, and D. Utami, “Learning Approach Based on Local Wisdom in Indramayu: A Theoretical Review,” ATTA'DIB, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 137–148, 2025. https://doi.org/10.32832/at-tadib.v9i1.21410
6
Masbur, “Pembelajaran Pedagogik Spiritual Melalui Kearifan Lokal,” J. MUDARRISUNA Media Kaji. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 869, 2022. https://doi.org/10.22373/jm.v12i4.17209
7
B. Parmadi, O. Agiustora, and F. Noperman, “Pembelajaran Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Masa Pandemi dalam Konteks Eksistensi dan Kreativitas Guru,” J. KAPEDAS–Kaji. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2022. https://doi.org/10.33369/kapedas.v1i1.21060
8
A. Pranata, “Pendidikan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Kearifan di Entikong Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat,” 2022.
9
M. Zulkarnaen, “Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Era Milenial,” AL MA’ARIEF J. Pendidik. Sos. dan Budaya, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaarief.v4i1.2518
10
G. A. D. Sugiharni, P. S. Jayendra, and A. A. I. P. Widiastiti, “Technology-Embedded Local Wisdom as a Digital Rubric for Reflective Mathematics Assessment in Vocational Education,” J. Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 6, p. 5, 2026. https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i6.2026.5
11
H. Nindiasari et al., “Numeracy Website of Local Wisdom in Mathematics Learning: Metacognitive Approach and Mathematical Reflective Thinking Ability,” Infin. J., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 595–622, 2026. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v15i2.p595-622
12
Syahrul, E. Purwati, L. Waluyo, and N. Azmin, “Efektivitas Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Daerah Bima ‘Ngaha Aina Ngoho’ dalam Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreativitas Siswa SMAN 1 Lambitu,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 245–254, 2026. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v11i1.4459
13
S. Mursali, S. D. Utami, S. N. Primawati, I. N. Dewi, and A. Sukri, “Effectiveness of Local Wisdom-Based Project-Based Ethnopedagogical Learning in Enhancing Students’ Critical Literacy: A Quasi-Experimental Study,” Al-Jahiz J. Biol. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 173–190, 2026. https://doi.org/10.32332/al-jahiz.v7i1.12144
14
V. Y. Sari, A. Trisiana, and Jumanto, “Pengaruh Model CTL Berbasis Kearifan Lokal terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran IPAS SDN Gandekan Surakarta,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 3, 2025. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i03.30453
15
D. Damanhuri, M. Fathurrohman, and Y. Yuhana, “A Systematic Literature Review on Local Wisdom-Based Citizenship Education Learning,” J. Moral Civ. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 196–212, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24036/8851412812024831
16
M. Syarifah, P. E. Suarmika, and N. Hidayat, “Integrasi Konsep Berpikir Reflektif: Sebuah Kajian Literatur Sistematis Praktik Pembelajaran Matematika di Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah,” Cendekia Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 136–145, 2026. https://doi.org/10.36841/cendekiapendidikan.v5i2.8119
17
T. I. Sari, E. Handoyo, and I. E. Armaidi, “Integrasi Kearifan Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar di Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review,” Didakt. J. Ilm. PGSD STKIP Subang, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 233–244, 2026. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.15629
18
M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
19
M. Campbell et al., “Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) in Systematic Reviews: Reporting Guideline,” BMJ, vol. 368, p. l6890, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
20
Q. N. Hong et al., Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), Version 2018: User Guide. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill University, 2018.
21
J. A. C. Sterne et al., “ROBINS-I: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions,” BMJ, vol. 355, p. i4919, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
22
D. Safitri, N. Inayah, Taufik, and J. Astuti, “Local Wisdom Oriented-Problem Based Learning Model Assisted by Interactive E-Magazine to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,” JPPS (J. Penelit. Pendidik. Sains), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 129–142, 2024. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v13n2.p129-142
23
S. Indahyani, S. Ningsyih, and Syafruddin, “Media Komik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Ngguda Fare pada Pembelajaran Perkembangbiakan Tumbuhan untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SDN 39 Rabadompu Barat,” JagoMIPA J. Pendidik. Mat. dan IPA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 479–492, 2025. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v5i2.1541
24
Y. Irhasyuarna, M. K. Fahmi, H. Fajeriadi, W. R. Aulia, S. Nikmah, and Z. Rahili, “Integrated Science Teaching Materials with Local Wisdom Insights to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability,” BIO-INOVED J. Biol. Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 328–334, 2022. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v4i3.14148
25
A. Apriani and Wahyudi, “Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan Multimedia Interaktif untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar IPAS tentang Kearifan Lokal di Masyarakat Sekitarku,” Kalam Cendekia J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 14, no. 1, 2026. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v14i1.106179
26
S. W. Syukur and A. B. Sutrisno, “Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu dengan Wawasan Kearifan Lokal untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa,” J. Pelita J. Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2023. https://doi.org/10.54065/pelita.3.1.2023.319
27
L. S. Ardila, Rosmiati, and T. Juniarso, “Pengaruh Model PBL Berbantuan Media Pembelajaran Monopoli IPA terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa pada Materi Bagian Tubuh Tumbuhan Beserta Fungsinya,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 2, 2025. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.23277
28
I. Kurniasari and H. N. Fauziah, “Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Berbasis Socioscientific untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Peserta Didik,” J. Tadris IPA Indones., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 272–282, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v2i3.919
29
N. Ramadani et al., “Penggunaan Model QODE Berbasis Kearifan Lokal untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa di SD N 2 Bumirejo Kebumen,” in Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 2025, pp. 1423–1431. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v8i3.107400
30
I. Kurniasari, R. V. Choyrunisa, and I. G. M. Sanjaya, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbasis Culturally Responsive Teaching untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Peserta Didik,” J. Tadris IPA Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 259–271, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v4i2.3271
31
R. Hayati, H. Alberida, F. Arsih, and S. Fajrina, “Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Reflektif Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Biologi Melalui Penerapan Model Problem Solving Berbasis Isu Sosiosaintifik,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1357–1364, 2023. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i3.1479
32
D. Kaigere, A. Ali, and S. M. Ohee, “Efektivitas Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kearifan Lokal dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis pada Mata Kuliah Konsep Dasar IPA SD Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar,” Edukasi Terkini J. Pendidik. Mod., vol. 7, no. 1, 2025.
33
N. E. Fitrisiyah, Rosmiati, and T. Juniarso, “Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Materi Gaya di Sekitar Kita Kelas IV SDN Purisemanding 1,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i01.23853
34
E. Kenari and A. W. Subiantoro, “Cukai Minuman Berpemanis dalam Pembelajaran Biologi: Socio-Scientific Issue dan Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Peserta Didik Kelas XI SMA,” J. Inov. Pembelajaran Biol., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2023. https://doi.org/10.26740/jipb.v4n2.p58-68
35
R. A. Desky, S. N. Fatmawati, A. Kastur, Mustain, Julianto, and A. S. Rukmi, “Strategi dan Tantangan Pengembangan Berpikir Reflektif dalam Pembelajaran IPA Sekolah Dasar,” Didakt. J. Pemikir. Pendidik., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 366–379, 2025. https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v31i2.9845
36
S. M. Sari, Rosmiati, and T. Juniarso, “Pengaruh Model PBL Menggunakan Media Video Interaktif Berbasis Animasi terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif pada Materi Rantai Makanan di Kelas V,” Pendas J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 112–123, 2025. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i01.22936
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shintia Ambarwati, Nukhbatul Bidayati Haka, Aryani Dwi Kesumawardani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Information
Published
2026-09-10
