Conceptualizing Deep-Inquiry Through Mindful, Meaningful, and Joyful Learning: An Exploratory Study of Elementary School Teachers’ Perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v3i4.796Keywords:
Deep Inquiry, Mindful Learning, Meaningful Learning, Joyful LearningAbstract
Deep Inquiry requires more than investigative and collaborative activities. Its depth also depends on learners’ ability to construct meaning, reflect on their thinking processes, and sustain engagement throughout learning. However, the relationship between Mindful, Meaningful, and Joyful (MMJ) Learning and the dimensions of Deep Inquiry as a basis for developing a conceptual framework in elementary education has received limited empirical attention. This study aimed to conceptualize Deep Inquiry through the lens of MMJ Learning based on elementary school teachers’ perceptions. An exploratory quantitative design was employed with 200 elementary school teachers. Data were collected using a 21-item Deep Inquiry instrument and a 42-item MMJ Learning instrument. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlation to examine perceived implementation levels and relationships among dimensions. The results indicated that the perceived implementation of Deep Inquiry was high (, ), although it varied across dimensions. Investigation and Digital Literacy () and Collaboration and Open Discussion () recorded the highest scores, whereas Connection and Categorization () and Initiation and Curiosity () received relatively lower scores. MMJ Learning was also perceived as highly implemented (, ), with Joyful Learning achieving the highest score (). Deep Inquiry and MMJ Learning were positively and significantly correlated (, ). These findings support a conceptual framework integrating cognitive depth, metacognitive regulation, and affective-social engagement.
References
[1] N. E. Perry, D. Lundie, and G. Golder, “Metacognition in schools: What does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition?,” Educational Review, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 483–500, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1441127
[2] S. Hadi, M. Dolk, and T. Hidayanto, “Mathematical reasoning: How students learn mathematics?,” Journal on Mathematics Education, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 937–954, 2025. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp937-954
[3] Y. W. Purnomo, M. Shahrill, O. Pandansari, R. Susanti, and W. Winarni, “Cognitive demands on geometrical tasks in Indonesian elementary school mathematics textbook,” Jurnal Elemen, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 466–479, 2022. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i2.5235
[4] A. N. Rohmah, S. Sutama, Y. M. Hidayati, E. Fauziati, and L. E. Rahmawati, “Planning for cultivation numerical literacy in mathematics learning for minimum competency assessment (AKM) in elementary schools,” Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 503–516, 2022. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i3.51774
[5] Lisnani, R. I. I. Putri, Zulkardi, and Somakim, “Web-based realistic mathematics learning environment for 21st-century skills in primary school students,” Journal on Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 253–274, 2023. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp253-274
[6] A. W. Lazonder and R. Harmsen, “Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 681–718, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
[7] G. Chen, Y. Zhou, H. Wang, et al., “‘CAI-AR’ instructional model: An ACT-R theory-based investigation of how students conduct scientific inquiry through augmented reality technology,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 31, pp. 301–334, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13815-y
[8] N. Wasito and Herpratiwi, “Assessment practices of elementary school teachers based on competency mapping: An equity-oriented perspective for supporting deep learning,” Women, Education, and Social Welfare, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–41, 2026. https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v3i1.409
[9] Y. Li, S. Xu, and J. Liu, “Development and validation of computational thinking assessment of Chinese elementary school students,” Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, vol. 15, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909211010240
[10] M.-J. Tsai, F. P. Chien, S. Wen-Yu Lee, C.-Y. Hsu, and J.-C. Liang, “Development and validation of the Computational Thinking Test for Elementary School Students (CTT-ES): Correlate CT competency with CT disposition,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1110–1129, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211051043
[11] K. Koh, O. Chapman, B. Gierus, et al., “Assessment of higher-level mathematical thinking skills: A scoping review,” ZDM – Mathematics Education, vol. 57, pp. 665–678, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01695-y
[12] S. M. M. Loyens, J. E. van Meerten, L. Schaap, et al., “Situating higher-order, critical, and critical-analytic thinking in problem- and project-based learning environments: A systematic review,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 35, art. no. 39, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x
[13] P. Eadie et al., “Early childhood educators’ wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Early Childhood Education Journal, vol. 49, pp. 903–913, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01203-3
[14] M. Kopbayeva, A. Uspabayeva, and T. Atici, “The effect of inquiry-based learning compared with traditional instruction on the learning outcomes of pre-service biology teachers: A systematic review,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 11, art. no. 1854373, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1854373
[15] K. Arar, A. Saiti, and M. Guajardo, “Redesigning and recomputing the future of education: The role of technology, the learning process, personality traits, and diversity in learning systems,” Power and Education, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 243–258, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438221117346
[16] Y. Zou, F. Kuek, W. Feng, and X. Cheng, “Digital learning in the 21st century: Trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, art. no. 1562391, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391
[17] C. Morris, B. Agbo, M. Osman, J. Basketts, and T. Kyriacou, “The components and implications of teacher workload: A review,” Educational Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 173–194, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2026.2629284
[18] G. Makamure, “Promoting gender-responsive pedagogies in open education at Eswatini’s higher education institutions,” SN Social Sciences, vol. 5, art. no. 162, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01202-w
[19] S. Halawa, T.-C. Lin, and Y.-S. Hsu, “Exploring instructional design in K-12 STEM education: A systematic literature review,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 11, art. no. 43, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00503-5
[20] R. P. Antonio and M. S. Prudente, “Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 251–281, 2024. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
[21] E. M. Furtak, T. Seidel, H. Iverson, and D. C. Briggs, “Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 300–329, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
[22] M. Pedaste et al., “Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle,” Educational Research Review, vol. 14, pp. 47–61, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
[23] T. T. S. Strat, E. K. Henriksen, and K. M. Jegstad, “Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review,” Studies in Science Education, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 191–249, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
[24] M. Yun and K. J. Crippen, “The use of educational technology in inquiry-based elementary science education: A systematic review,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1256–1279, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2284689
[25] T. Seufert, “Transforming self-regulated learning – Multimodal insights and future directions,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 38, art. no. 11, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10119-6
[26] D. S. Fleur, B. Bredeweg, and W. van den Bos, “Metacognition: Ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences,” npj Science of Learning, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5
[27] M. L. Phan et al., “Mindfulness-based school interventions: A systematic review of outcome evidence quality by study design,” Mindfulness, vol. 13, pp. 1591–1613, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01885-9
[28] E. Lucciarini, A. Carr, N. Bressoud, et al., “Evermore wellbeing for teens: A scoping review of stand-alone and brief positive psychology interventions for potential use in educational settings,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 37, art. no. 63, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10033-3
[29] A. Vasiou and C. Smaropoulou, “Social-emotional learning interventions: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials in primary education,” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 41, art. no. 113, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-026-01174-2
[30] Y. Hu, B. P. Godor, M. Nederhand, G. Smeets, and R. Van der Hallen, “Programs and practices influencing socio-emotional learning in primary schools: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Applied School Psychology, pp. 1–24, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2026.2701647
[31] H. Sasse, A. M. Weber, T. Reuter, and M. Leuchter, “Teacher guidance and on-the-fly scaffolding in primary school students’ inquiry learning,” Science Education, vol. 109, pp. 579–604, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21921
[32] L. Leden and L. Hansson, “Teachers’ perspectives on scaffolding open inquiry in primary school science,” International Journal of Science Education, pp. 1–19, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2026.2670713
[33] S. Karlsen, M. Kersting, M. Ødegaard, M. Olufsen, M. Lill Suhr, and M. Kjærnsli, “A comparative study of teachers’ conceptualisations and enactment of inquiry-based science education,” International Journal of Science Education, pp. 1–31, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2547411
[34] Seprie, W. Wuryandani, and Muthmainah, “Transforming primary education: Balancing social skills and academic achievement through global inquiry-based learning models,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, art. no. 1512274, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1512274
[35] I. R. W. Atmojo, D. Y. Saputri, Matsuri, R. Ardiansnyah, F. P. Adi, and Burhan, “Tailoring inquiry for young scientists: Investigating the impact of a DI PBL model on elementary students’ curiosity in biodiversity learning,” Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, art. no. 2580068, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2580068
[36] D. Neubauer-Hametner, H. Wendt, and D. Kasper, “Teacher perceptions of classroom composition and instructional strategies in primary school science education,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, art. no. 1490875, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1490875
[37] J. Olop, M. Granström, and E. Kikas, “Students’ metacognitive knowledge of learning-strategy effectiveness and their recall of teachers’ strategy instructions,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, art. no. 1307485, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1307485
[38] A. Tamblyn et al., “How do physical or sensory early childhood education and care environment factors affect children’s social and emotional development? A systematic scoping review,” Educational Research Review, vol. 41, art. no. 100555, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100555
[39] N. Bergdahl, M. Bond, J. Sjöberg, et al., “Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: A systematic review,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 21, art. no. 63, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y
[40] A. Derakhshan and H. Yin, “Do positive emotions prompt students to be more active? Unraveling the role of hope, pride, and enjoyment in predicting Chinese and Iranian EFL students’ academic engagement,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 3099–3117, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2329166
[41] K. T. Nesbitt, E. Blinkoff, R. M. Golinkoff, and K. Hirsh-Pasek, “Making schools work: An equation for active playful learning,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 141–154, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2202136
[42] M. Ganajová, R. Orosová, I. Sotáková, and P. Letošníková, “The effect of inquiry-based teaching on students’ attitudes toward science as an academic subject as well as science and technology in general,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, art. no. 1708139, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1708139
[43] S. Walan and B. Mc Ewen, “Primary teachers’ reflections on inquiry- and context-based science education,” Research in Science Education, vol. 47, pp. 407–426, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9507-5
[44] Y. Xue and F. Khalid, “Investigating the impact of metacognitive regulation on students’ academic performance: A quantitative study of Chinese distance learners,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 17, art. no. 1726956, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1726956
[45] M. Farrokhnia, A. Taghizade, R. Ahmadi, P. M. Papadopoulos, and O. Noroozi, “Community of inquiry: A bridge linking motivation and self-regulation to satisfaction with e-learning,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 65, art. no. 100992, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100992
[46] S. Woodcock, U. Sharma, P. Subban, and E. Hitches, “Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers’ engagement with inclusive practices,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 117, art. no. 103802, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103802
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rabiyatul Adawiyah Siregar, Hasan Hariri, Alif Luthvi Azizah, Eva Faliyanti, Asep Hardiyanto, Rina Agustina, Didi Sudarmansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.