Artikel Open Access CC BY 4.0

Decentering Dominant English Norms: Multilingual Teachers’ Ideological Shifts and Challenges Toward EIL-Aware Assessment and Instruction

Authors

  • Marife R. Waje Tarlac State University Philippines
Article Integrity Crossmark: Check for updates
Article Metrics
20 Article Views 20 PDF Downloads

Abstract

English language education in multilingual settings continues to be influenced by native-speaker-centered norms, even as English increasingly functions as a shared international resource. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study examined multilingual English teachers’ ideological shifts toward English as an International Language (EIL)-aware assessment and instruction, the challenges they encountered in decentering dominant English norms, and the demographic factors associated with these outcomes. The quantitative phase involved 31 multilingual English teachers from selected public secondary schools in Tarlac Province, Philippines; 12 respondents were subsequently selected for semi-structured interviews through purposeful maximum variation sampling. Descriptive statistics, multiple regression, and Pearson correlation were used for the quantitative data, while thematic analysis was used for the qualitative strand. Teachers demonstrated a high overall level of EIL-aware ideological shift (M = 3.81, SD = 0.51), with instruction receiving the highest mean (M = 4.05). Challenges were moderate (M = 2.87, SD = 1.22). Teaching position, professional training, educational attainment, and years of teaching significantly influenced ideological shifts, while age and several professional variables influenced perceived challenges. Ideological shifts were strongly and negatively related to challenges (r = -0.721, p < .001). Four qualitative themes emerged: English as a global and shared language, multilingualism as pedagogical strength, negotiating native-speaker norms, and teacher identity as multilingual facilitator. Integration of the findings produced a Decentered English Instruction Framework for inclusive, multilingual, and context-responsive English education.

References

1
[1] B. B. Kachru, “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle,” in English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, R. Quirk and H. Widdowson, Eds. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 11-30.
2
[2] S. L. McKay, Teaching English as an International Language: Rethinking Goals and Approaches. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2002.
3
[3] J. Jenkins, English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2015.
4
[4] N. Galloway and H. Rose, Introducing Global Englishes. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2015.
5
[5] H. Rose and N. Galloway, Global Englishes for Language Teaching. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
6
[6] H. Rose, J. McKinley, and N. Galloway, “Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research,” Language Teaching, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 157-189, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000518
7
[7] O. García and W. Li, Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
8
[8] J. Cenoz and D. Gorter, “Translanguaging as a pedagogical tool in multilingual education,” Language Awareness, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 193-207, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1363007
9
[9] A. Holliday, “Native-speakerism,” ELT Journal, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 385-387, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl030
10
[10] H. Guo, Q. Chen, and Y. Sun, “Native speakerism revisited: A critical review and agenda for future research,” System, vol. 99, Art. no. 102506, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102506
11
[11] N. C. Sifakis and Y. Bayyurt, “English as a Lingua Franca awareness in teacher education: A critical review of research trends and future directions,” Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 263-288, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2018-0017
12
[12] Y. Bayyurt and N. C. Sifakis, “Transforming into an ELF-aware teacher: An international reflective journey,” Language Teaching, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 471-485, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000160
13
[13] M. Dewey and E. Pineda, “ELF and teacher education: Attitudes and beliefs,” ELT Journal, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 430-439, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa034
14
[14] T. Burner and C. H. Carlsen, “Teachers’ multilingual beliefs and practices in English classrooms: A scoping review,” System, vol. 116, Art. no. 103070, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103070
15
[15] T. H. Choi and Y. Liu, “Multilingual pedagogies and the negotiation of English language ideologies,” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 599-613, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1646128
16
[16] L. Harding and T. McNamara, “English as a Lingua Franca and language assessment,” in The Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, B. Seidlhofer and H. Knapp, Eds. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2017, pp. 523-540.
17
[17] D. Tsagari and L. Cheng, “English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) and assessment: Challenges and constraints,” in The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2017, pp. 555-569.
18
[18] Y. Bayyurt, R. Büyükyavuz, and E. Ulaş, “English as a lingua franca and pre-service teachers’ language assessment literacy,” LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 760-769, 2023. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6314
19
[19] F. Fang, “Teacher beliefs and practices of language assessment in the context of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF): Insights from a CPD course,” Languages, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 58, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010058
20
[20] L. Lopriore, “Language education in plurilingual contexts: Challenges and perspectives within an ELF-aware approach,” Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 50-65, 2024.
21
[21] N. C. Sifakis, “The ideological shift in teacher education: Towards a critical ELF-aware stance,” World Englishes, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 443-456, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12381
22
[22] N. C. Sifakis, “English as a Lingua Franca and the ideal non-native speaker: Professional identity and ideology in language education,” Language Teaching, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 543-558, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000115
23
[23] A. Matsuda, Preparing Teachers to Teach English as an International Language. Bristol, U.K.: Multilingual Matters, 2017.
24
[24] B. Norton, Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation, 2nd ed. Bristol, U.K.: Multilingual Matters, 2013.
25
[25] G. Gay, Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2018.
26
[26] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
27
[27] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
28
[28] G. Guest, A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, “How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability,” Field Methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59-82, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
29
[29] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
30
[30] C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker, SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt, Germany: SmartPLS, 2024. https://www.smartpls.com

Author Biography

Marife R. Waje

Tarlac State University Philippines

Tarlac State University

License

Download Article

Downloads

Article Tools

View Issue