Developing Character-Based Animated Learning Media Using Animaker: A Case Study in Indonesian Junior High School Social Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70211/disolife.v1i1.255Keywords:
Animaker, Learning Media, Social Studies, Social Interaction, Educational Technology, ADDIE Model, Student EngagementAbstract
This study aims to develop and evaluate character-based learning media using the Animaker application for grade VII students at Junior High School (SMP) of Natar. The development of engaging and effective learning media is essential for improving student engagement and understanding, particularly in subjects like social studies, where complex concepts such as Social Interaction can be difficult for students to grasp. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach, following the ADDIE model, which consists of five stages: research and data collection, product design, product development, product trials, and product revisions. The product developed is an animated video that integrates Social Interaction material with Islamic values, intended to support social studies education. The study’s evaluation process involved expert validation of the learning media and material. The media validation received a score of 90%, and the material validation achieved a perfect score of 100%, both categorized as "Very Strong." In addition, a student trial was conducted with 31 grade VII students, who showed positive responses and high engagement with the learning media. The effectiveness of the media was further confirmed through pre- and post-test assessments, demonstrating improved student understanding of the material. The results indicate that the Animaker-based learning media is valid, practical, and effective for enhancing student engagement and comprehension of social studies topics. This study contributes to the development of innovative educational tools that integrate multimedia to support active learning in the classroom.
References
M. Zamiri and A. Esmaeili, “Strategies, Methods, and Supports for Developing Skills within Learning Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Adm. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, p. 231, Sep. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090231
Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, pp. 275–285, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
M. Chankseliani, I. Qoraboyev, and D. Gimranova, “Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: new empirical and conceptual insights,” High. Educ., vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 109–127, Jan. 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8
S. Grassini, “Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 7, p. 692, Jul. 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
N. Kerimbayev, K. Adamova, R. Shadiev, and Z. Altinay, “Intelligent educational technologies in individual learning: a systematic literature review,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 1, Jan. 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00360-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00360-3
W. James, G. Oates, and N. Schonfeldt, “Improving retention while enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes using gamified mobile technology,” Account. Educ., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 366–386, May 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2326009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2326009
M. Vieriu and G. Petrea, “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 343, Mar. 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
H. Balalle, “Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 9, p. 100870, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870
Micallef and P. M. Newton, “The Use of Concrete Examples Enhances the Learning of Abstract Concepts: A Replication Study,” Teach. Psychol., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 22–29, Jan. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283211058069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283211058069
N. E. Akhan, S. Demirezen, and S. Çiçek, “We are Late Enough: Take Action in Social Studies Classes,” Sage Open, vol. 13, no. 3, Jul. 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231193824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231193824
M. Demir, “A taxonomy of social media for learning,” Comput. Educ., vol. 218, p. 105091, Sep. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105091
J. Beautemps, A. Bresges, and S. Becker-Genschow, “Enhancing Learning Through Animated Video: An Eye-Tracking Methodology Approach,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 148–159, Feb. 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10162-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10162-4
Y. Walter, “Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 15, Feb. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
S. Schneider, F. Krieglstein, M. Beege, and G. D. Rey, “Successful learning with whiteboard animations – A question of their procedural character or narrative embedding?,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 2, p. e13229, Feb. 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13229
E. Commodari, J. Sole, M. Guarnera, and V. L. La Rosa, “Mental imagery in education: What impact on the relationships with visuospatial processing and school performance in junior high school students?,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 54, p. 101667, Dec. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101667
J. C. Castro-Alonso, B. B. de Koning, L. Fiorella, and F. Paas, “Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1379–1407, Dec. 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9
S. K. Ridha, H. B. Bostanci, and M. Kurt, “Using Animated Videos to Enhance Vocabulary Learning at the Noble Private Technical Institute (NPTI) in Northern Iraq/Erbil,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 7002, Jun. 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127002
M. Younas and Y. Dong, “The Impact of Using Animated Movies in Learning English Language Vocabulary: An Empirical Study of Lahore, Pakistan,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 2, Apr. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241258398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241258398
S. Malakul and I. Park, “The effects of using an auto-subtitle system in educational videos to facilitate learning for secondary school students: learning comprehension, cognitive load, and satisfaction,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 4, Jan. 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00224-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00224-2
M. Koo and S.-W. Yang, “Likert-Type Scale,” Encyclopedia, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 18, Feb. 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010018
R. E. Mayer, “The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 36, no. 1, p. 8, Mar. 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
M. D. Abdulrahaman et al., “Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05312, Nov. 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
M. Farrokhnia, R. F. G. Meulenbroeks, and W. R. van Joolingen, “Student-Generated Stop-Motion Animation in Science Classes: a Systematic Literature Review,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 797–812, Dec. 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09857-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09857-1
M. Zuo, Y. Hu, H. Luo, H. Ouyang, and Y. Zhang, “K-12 students’ online learning motivation in China: An integrated model based on community of inquiry and technology acceptance theory,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 4599–4620, May 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10791-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10791-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Afif Primahadi, Atik Purwasih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.