Tracing Digital Learning Trajectories in Biology Education ‎Across the Life Course: A Qualitative Study of Learners’ ‎Transitions and Meaning Making

Tracing Digital Learning Trajectories in Biology Education ‎Across the Life Course: A Qualitative Study of Learners’ ‎Transitions and Meaning Making

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70211/disolife.v1i2.336

Keywords:

Digital biology learning, Life course perspective, Lifelong learning, Narrative inquiry, Science ‎education

Abstract

The increasing integration of digital technologies in science education has reshaped how biology is learned across formal and informal contexts; however, existing research has predominantly focused on short-term outcomes, offering limited insight into how digital biology learning evolves across individuals’ life courses. This study aims to explore digital biology learning experiences through a life-course perspective, examining learning trajectories, critical transitions, and meaning-making processes across different stages of life. Employing a qualitative narrative inquiry design, data were collected from 15 participants through in-depth semi-structured interviews, written reflections, and digital learning artifacts, and analyzed using thematic narrative analysis informed by life-course theory. The findings reveal three interconnected themes: evolving digital learning trajectories characterized by a shift from teacher-directed to self directed learning, critical transitions that reshape engagement with digital biology learning, and dynamic processes of meaning-making that increasingly connect biological knowledge to everyday life contexts such as health and environmental awareness. These results demonstrate that digital biology learning is a cumulative and adaptive process shaped by temporal, contextual, and biographical factors rather than isolated instructional events. The study contributes to the literature by integrating life-course theory with digital biology education research, highlighting the importance of designing flexible and learner-centered digital learning environments that support continuity, agency, and lifelong engagement with biological knowledge, with implications for educators, curriculum developers, and education policymakers seeking to promote sustainable lifelong science learning.

References

‎[1] ‎ Y. Zou, F. Kuek, W. Feng, and X. Cheng, “Digital learning in the 21st century: trends, ‎challenges, and innovations in technology integration,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, Mar. 2025. ‎‎[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391

‎[2] ‎ T. K. F. Chiu and Y. Li, “How can emerging technologies impact STEM education?,” J. ‎STEM Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 375–384, Dec. 2023. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00113-w.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00113-w

‎[3] ‎ T. M. Alam, G. A. Stoica, K. Sharma, and Ö. Özgöbek, “Digital technologies in the ‎classrooms in the last decade (2014–2023): a bibliometric analysis,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, ‎Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1533588.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1533588

‎[4] ‎ M. A. K. Al Momani, K. A. Alharahasheh, and M. Alqudah, “Digital learning in Sciences ‎education: A literature review,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, Dec. 2023. [Online]. ‎Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2277007.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2277007

‎[5] ‎ H. M. I. Zafeer, S. Maqbool, Y. Rong, and S. Maqbool, “Impact of digital learning tools on ‎student’s engagement and achievement in middle school science classes,” Int. J. Technol. ‎Educ. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 285–304, Apr. 2025. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.622.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.622

‎[6] ‎ C. del R. Navas Bonilla, L. M. Viñan Carrasco, J. C. Gaibor Pupiales, and D. E. Murillo ‎Noriega, “The future of education: A systematic literature review of self-directed learning ‎with AI,” Futur. Internet, vol. 17, no. 8, p. 366, Aug. 2025. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17080366.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17080366

‎[7] ‎ K. Sangur, S. Zubaidah, and Sulisetijono, “A systematic literature review of mobile ‎learning trends in biology education over ten years,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 11, p. ‎‎101429, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101429.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101429

‎[8] ‎ C. Navarro, M. Arias-Calderón, C. A. Henríquez, and P. Riquelme, “Assessment of student ‎and teacher perceptions on the use of virtual simulation in cell biology laboratory ‎education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 243, Feb. 2024. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030243.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030243

‎[9] ‎ F. Almasri, “Simulations to teach science subjects: Connections among students’ ‎engagement, self-confidence, satisfaction, and learning styles,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. ‎‎27, no. 5, pp. 7161–7181, Jun. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-‎‎022-10940-w.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10940-w

‎[10] ‎ S. Edler and A. Hadjar, “Educational trajectories within and beyond the core education ‎phase in Switzerland: A sequence analysis based on SHP data 1999–2023,” Front. Sociol., ‎vol. 10, Jun. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1585910.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1585910

‎[11] ‎ M. Parreira do Amaral and J. Tikkanen, “Governing the life course through lifelong ‎learning: A multilevel and multidimensional view,” Societies, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 84, May ‎‎2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12030084.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12030084

‎[12] ‎ A. D. Benner, S. Chen, R. S. Mistry, and Y. Shen, “Life course transitions and educational ‎trajectories: Examining adolescents who fall off track academically,” J. Youth Adolesc., ‎vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1068–1080, Jun. 2021. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01376-x.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01376-x

‎[13] ‎ M. Chen, “A life course perspective on disability: Education-to-work transitions of people ‎with visual impairments in China,” Front. Sociol., vol. 10, Nov. 2025. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1627946.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1627946

‎[14] ‎ L. Guerrero-Puerta and M. Torres Sánchez, “Early leaving from education and training and ‎related matters through the lens of the life course paradigm: A systematic review of the ‎literature,” Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 9, p. 521, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090521.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090521

‎[15] ‎ S. Mollborn, P. Fomby, J. A. Goode, and A. Modile, “A life course framework for ‎understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood,” Adv. Life Course Res., ‎vol. 47, p. 100379, Mar. 2021. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100379.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100379

‎[16] ‎ S. Vishnu et al., “Digital competence of higher education learners in the context of ‎COVID-19 triggered online learning,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 100320, ‎‎2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100320.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100320

‎[17] ‎ S. Farias-Gaytan, I. Aguaded, and M.-S. Ramirez-Montoya, “Digital transformation and ‎digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: A ‎systematic literature review,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 386, Jul. 2023. ‎‎[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01875-9.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01875-9

‎[18] ‎ A. W. Subiantoro, R. C. Handziko, and Y. Wibowo, “A narrative inquiry of socio-scientific ‎issues-based e-learning development in biology to promote student health literacy,” ‎Biosfer, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 132–143, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.20373.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.20373

‎[19] ‎ J. M. M. Loseñara and C. P. Loseñara, “Beginning science teachers’ online classes: A ‎narrative inquiry,” JPBI (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol. Indones.), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 47–57, Feb. ‎‎2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31800.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.31800

‎[20] ‎ J. M. L. Lim, “A narrative exploration of one teacher’s storied experiences of online ‎learning during COVID-19,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 12, p. 1211, Dec. 2023. [Online]. ‎Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121211.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121211

‎[21] ‎ J. Tondeur, S. K. Howard, R. Scherer, and F. Siddiq, “Untangling the great online ‎transition: A network model of teachers’ experiences with online practices,” Comput. ‎Educ., vol. 203, p. 104866, Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104866.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104866

‎[22] ‎ S. Bilici and R. M. Yilmaz, “The effects of using collaborative digital storytelling on ‎academic achievement and skill development in biology education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., ‎vol. 29, no. 15, pp. 20243–20266, Oct. 2024. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12638-7.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12638-7

‎[23] ‎ A. M. Nurdin, A. Gofur, M. Sapta Sari, and M. Munzil, “Technology-supported ‎differentiated biology education: Trends, methods, content, and impacts,” Eurasia J. Math. ‎Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 21, no. 3, p. em2598, Mar. 2025. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16044.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16044

‎[24] ‎ H. Gu, Y. Liang, and Q. Wang, “A narrative inquiry into the agency of an EFL teacher in ‎Western China,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Sep. 2022. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957372.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957372

‎[25] ‎ L. Wei, “Narrative inquiry: A research method in the education field,” World J. Educ., vol. ‎‎13, no. 6, p. 35, Dec. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v13n6p35.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v13n6p35

‎[26] ‎ J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed ‎Methods Approaches, SAGE Publications, 2022. [Online]. Available: ‎https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Pr2VEAAAQBAJ.‎

‎[27] ‎ B. K. Czinczel, D. Fiedler, J. Großschedl, and U. Harms, “Describing students’ learning ‎about evolution through the lens of digital concept mapping,” Evol. Educ. Outreach, vol. ‎‎18, no. 1, p. 10, Oct. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-025-00225-‎‎4.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-025-00225-4

‎[28] ‎ Q. N. Naveed, H. Choudhary, N. Ahmad, J. Alqahtani, and A. I. Qahmash, “Mobile ‎learning in higher education: A systematic literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. ‎‎18, p. 13566, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813566.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813566

‎[29] ‎ Q. Pan, F. Reichert, Q. Liang, J. de la Torre, and N. Law, “Measuring digital literacy across ‎ages and over time: Development and validation of a performance-based assessment,” ‎Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 15, pp. 22065–22100, Oct. 2025. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13592-8.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13592-8

‎[30] ‎ T. Nakunsong, “Evolving K-12 digital education: Enhancing flexibility and access through ‎online learning and virtual programs,” J. Educ. Learn. Rev., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1–12, Oct. ‎‎2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2024.791.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2024.791

‎[31] ‎ A. Lomellini, P. R. Lowenthal, C. Snelson, and J. H. Trespalacios, “Accessible and ‎inclusive online learning in higher education: A review of the literature,” J. Comput. High. ‎Educ., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1306–1329, Sep. 2025. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09424-2.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09424-2

‎[32]‎ ‎ O. Wohlfart and I. Wagner, “Longitudinal perspectives on technology acceptance: ‎Teachers’ integration of digital tools through the COVID-19 transition,” Educ. Inf. ‎Technol., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 6091–6115, Apr. 2025. [Online]. Available: ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12954-y.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12954-y

‎[33] ‎ R. Schweighart, M. Hast, A. M. Pampel, J. A. Rebien, and C. Trautwein, “Transition into ‎distance education: A scoping review,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 10, p. 1130, Oct. 2024. ‎‎[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101130.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101130

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15
Loading...