Post-Launch Public Interest in DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: A Comparative Google Trends Analysis in Indonesia and the Philippines
Article Integrity
Article Metrics
983
Article Views
585
PDF Downloads
9
Crossref Citations
Abstract
This study investigates the post-launch public interest in DeepSeek and ChatGPT through a comparative analysis using Google Trends data from Indonesia and the Philippines. Employing a quantitative approach, the research examines temporal trends and regional variations to understand public engagement patterns with these AI tools. The findings reveal that ChatGPT consistently garners higher public interest in both countries, driven by its global recognition, multilingual capabilities, and extensive integration into educational and professional contexts. In contrast, DeepSeek shows sporadic increases in interest, particularly within niche communities and academic environments. The analysis highlights the influence of cultural, linguistic, and technological factors on AI adoption, emphasizing that while global brand strength supports widespread engagement, localized strategies are crucial for fostering sustained interest in emerging technologies. This study contributes to the understanding of AI adoption dynamics in Southeast Asia, offering insights for developers, educators, and policymakers to optimize AI integration in diverse socio-cultural contexts.
References
1
J. R. Torres, J. M. C. Alberto, A. P. J. Guieb, and J. A. Villarama, "Language, Identity, and Ethics in AI-Driven Art: Perspectives from Human Artists in Digital Environments," Lang. Technol. Soc. Media, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17-29, 2025. https://doi.org/10.70211/ltsm.v3i1.137
2
L. Zhao, X. Wu, and H. Luo, "Developing AI Literacy for Primary and Middle School Teachers in China: Based on a Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 21, p. 14549, Nov. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114549
3
J. A. Villarama, "Demystifying Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Classrooms: Students' Attitude and Critical Thinking," Pakistan J. Life Soc. Sci., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3970-3979, 2025. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2025-23.1.00314
4
D. Lund, T. Wang, N. R. Mannuru, B. Nie, S. Shimray, and Z. Wang, "ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing," J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 570-581, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750
5
M. Salvagno, F. S. Taccone, and A. G. Gerli, "Can Artificial Intelligence Help for Scientific Writing?," Crit. Care, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 75, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
6
Othman, Deepseek AI Impact, 2025. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15632.11520
7
Granić, "Technology Adoption at Individual Level: Toward an Integrated Overview," Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 843-858, Jun. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00974-3
8
Hradecky, J. Kennell, W. Cai, and R. Davidson, "Organizational Readiness to Adopt Artificial Intelligence in the Exhibition Sector in Western Europe," Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 65, p. 102497, Aug. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102497
9
L. Ladu, C. Koch, P. Asna Ashari, K. Blind, and P. Castka, "Technology Adoption and Digital Maturity in the Conformity Assessment Industry: Empirical Evidence from an International Study," Technol. Soc., vol. 77, p. 102564, Jun. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102564
10
S. V. Nuti et al., "The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review," PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, p. e109583, Oct. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
11
S.-P. Jun, H. S. Yoo, and S. Choi, "Ten Years of Research Change Using Google Trends: From the Perspective of Big Data Utilizations and Applications," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 130, pp. 69-87, May 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.009
12
N. Mishra, T. Bharti, A. K. Tiwari, and G. Pfajfar, "Public and Scholarly Interest in Social Robots: An Investigation through Google Trends, Bibliometric Analysis, and Systematic Literature Review," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 206, p. 123578, Sep. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123578
13
Tubadji, T. Denney, and D. J. Webber, "Cultural Relativity in Consumers' Rates of Adoption of Artificial Intelligence," Econ. Inq., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1234-1251, Jul. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12978
14
Cui and F. Wu, "The Influence of Media Use on Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in China: Evidence from an Online Survey," Inf. Dev., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 45-57, Mar. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919893411
15
Kim, J. Woo, J. Shin, J. Lee, and Y. Kim, "Can Search Engine Data Improve Accuracy of Demand Forecasting for New Products? Evidence from Automotive Market," Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 1089-1103, Jun. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0347
16
R. Rusli and T. N. Safaah, "Research Trend on Ethnomathematics from 2012 To 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis," Indones. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 37-47, 2023. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i1.14794
17
J. Yang, Y. Blount, and A. Amrollahi, "Artificial Intelligence Adoption in a Professional Service Industry: A Multiple Case Study," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 201, p. 123251, Apr. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123251
18
Z. Li, J. Shi, Y. Zhao, B. Zhang, and B. Zhong, "Indirect Media Effects on the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence: The Roles of Perceived and Actual Knowledge in the Influence of Presumed Media Influence Model," J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 581-600, Aug. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2024.2377244
19
Y. K. Dwivedi et al., "Setting the Future of Digital and Social Media Marketing Research: Perspectives and Research Propositions," Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 59, p. 102168, Aug. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168
20
Li, Y. Chen, and Y. Shang, "A Review of Industrial Big Data for Decision Making in Intelligent Manufacturing," Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 29, p. 101021, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2021.06.001
21
P. T. Meade and L. Rabelo, "The Technology Adoption Life Cycle Attractor: Understanding the Dynamics of High-tech Markets," Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 667-684, Sep. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.01.008
22
H. G. Musa, I. Fatmawati, N. Nuryakin, and M. Suyanto, "Marketing Research Trends Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Comprehensive Review of Researches (2002-2022)," Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2329375
23
H. Jo, "Understanding AI Tool Engagement: A Study of ChatGPT Usage and Word-of-mouth Among University Students and Office Workers," Telemat. Informatics, vol. 85, p. 102067, Nov. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102067
24
Mohammed, A. A. Elega, M. B. Ahmad, and F. Oloyede, "Friends or Foes? Exploring the Framing of Artificial Intelligence Innovations in Africa-Focused Journalism," Journal. Media, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1749-1770, Nov. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040106
25
L. Chen, M. U. Khurram, Y. Gao, M. Z. Abedin, and B. Lucey, "ESG Disclosure and Technological Innovation Capabilities of the Chinese Listed Companies," Res. Int. Bus. Financ., vol. 65, p. 101974, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101974
26
T. Rosário and J. C. Dias, "How Has Data-driven Marketing Evolved: Challenges and Opportunities with Emerging Technologies," Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 100203, Nov. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100203
Author Biographies
Muhammad Aridan
Department of Scientific Journal Development and Publishing
Irwandani
Department of Physics Education
Joseph A. Villarama
College of Education
Abegail V. Dela Fuente
College of Education
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Aridan, Irwandani, Joseph A. Villarama, Abegail V. Dela Fuente
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Tools
Citation Impact
Crossref Cited-by
9
citations
Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.
Last checked 25 Aug 2026.How to Cite
Aridan, M., Irwandani, A. Villarama, J., & V. Dela Fuente, A. (2025). Post-Launch Public Interest in DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: A Comparative Google Trends Analysis in Indonesia and the Philippines. Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, and Future Research, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.70211/bafr.v1i1.166