Implementing Digital Integrated Learning in Schools: Evidence from Classroom Practices
Article Integrity
Article Metrics
35
Article Views
15
PDF Downloads
0
Crossref Citations
Abstract
The increasing integration of digital technologies in schools has raised critical questions regarding how digital integrated learning is enacted within everyday classroom practices. This study aimed to examine the pedagogical use of digital technologies by teachers, the instructional functions of digital tools, and the contextual factors shaping their classroom enactment. Employing a qualitative multiple case study design, data were collected through non-participant classroom observations, semi-structured teacher interviews, and analysis of instructional artifacts across selected secondary school classrooms. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis informed by constant comparative techniques to identify patterns of digital integration and pedagogical intent. The findings indicate that while digital technologies were consistently present in classroom instruction, their use was predominantly oriented toward content presentation and visualization, with limited integration into higher-order, student-centered learning activities such as inquiry, collaboration, and formative assessment. Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs, digital competence, and institutional support emerged as key factors influencing the depth and quality of digital integration. By foregrounding classroom enactment, this study contributes empirical evidence that bridges the gap between conceptual models of digital integration and observable teaching practices. The findings imply that professional development and policy initiatives should prioritize pedagogical design and reflective teaching practices over technical skill acquisition alone to foster meaningful and sustainable digital-integrated learning in schools.
References
1
[1] C. Kain, C. Koschmieder, M. Matischek-Jauk, and S. Bergner, “Mapping the landscape: A scoping review of 21st century skills literature in secondary education,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 151, p. 104739, Dec. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104739
2
[2] I. Govender, “Digital Literacy and STEM Skills- What is the Connection? A Systematic Review,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., Jul. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09879-x
3
[3] L. I. González-Pérez and M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, “Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1493, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
4
[4] S. Mhlongo, K. Mbatha, B. Ramatsetse, and R. Dlamini, “Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, p. e16348, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
5
[5] K. Okoye et al., “Impact of digitalized-education upon sustainable education and practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature based on pre-intra-and-post pandemic and rural education development,” Sustain. Futur., vol. 10, p. 100851, Dec. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100851
6
[6] M. B. Tafese and E. Kopp, “Embedding Social Sustainability in Education: A Thematic Review of Practices and Trends Across Educational Pathways from a Global Perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 10, p. 4342, May 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104342
7
[7] A. A. Gameil and A. M. Al-Abdullatif, “Using Digital Learning Platforms to Enhance the Instructional Design Competencies and Learning Engagement of Preservice Teachers,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 334, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040334
8
[8] Asmayawati, Yufiarti, and E. Yetti, “Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 100233, Mar. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233
9
[9] M. S. Fitzgerald and K. B. Evans, “Integrating Digital Tools to Enhance Access to Learning Opportunities in Project-based Science Instruction,” TechTrends, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 882–891, Sep. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00975-w
10
[10] R. Hidayat, Z. Zainuddin, and N. H. Mazlan, “The relationship between technological pedagogical content knowledge and belief among preservice mathematics teachers,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 249, p. 104432, Sep. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104432
11
[11] Y. Ning, C. Zhang, B. Xu, Y. Zhou, and T. T. Wijaya, “Teachers' AI-TPACK: Exploring the Relationship between Knowledge Elements,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 978, Jan. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030978
12
[12] H. Batool, S. Al-Otaibi, and M. Khan, “Decision making model for evaluation of TPACK knowledge constructs as critical success factors for language learning classes,” Heliyon, vol. 11, no. 2, p. e42061, Jan. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42061
13
[13] A. M. McCarthy, D. Maor, A. McConney, and C. Cavanaugh, “Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 100479, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479
14
[14] A. Veseli, P. Hasanaj, and A. Bajraktari, “Perceptions of Organizational Change Readiness for Sustainable Digital Transformation: Insights from Learning Management System Projects in Higher Education Institutions,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 619, Jan. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020619
15
[15] M. Ruloff and D. Petko, “School principals' educational goals and leadership styles for digital transformation: results from case studies in upper secondary schools,” Int. J. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 422–440, Mar. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2014979
16
[16] K. Børte and S. Lillejord, “Learning to teach: Aligning pedagogy and technology in a learning design tool,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 148, p. 104693, Oct. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104693
17
[17] M. Fitrah et al., “Are Teachers Ready to Adopt Deep Learning Pedagogy? The Role of Technology and 21st-Century Competencies Amid Educational Policy Reform,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 10, p. 1344, Oct. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101344
18
[18] H. Zhang, Z. Wang, R. Jiang, and H. Wu, “Exploring the Influence of Technology-Enhanced Active Learning Environments on Pre-Service Teachers' TPACK and Technology Beliefs,” Sage Open, vol. 15, no. 3, Jul. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251359823
19
[19] A. Kadluba, F. Reinhold, and A. Obersteiner, “How do teachers use digital technology in classrooms? Characterizing mathematics teachers' teaching practices,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 9, p. 100310, Dec. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100310
20
[20] L. Aleksieva, V. Racheva, and R. Peytcheva-Forsyth, “Talking Tech, Teaching with Tech: How Primary Teachers Implement Digital Technologies in Practice,” Informatics, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 99, Sep. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12030099
21
[21] E. A. Abedi, “Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1215–1234, Dec. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6
22
[22] Z. Alptekin and A. Taneri, “Technology ıntegration in pedagogical processes: digital competence and teaching practices of primary school teachers in Turkey,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 351, Sep. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00646-9
23
[23] I. Alberola-Mulet, M. J. Iglesias-Martínez, and I. Lozano-Cabezas, “Teachers' Beliefs about the Role of Digital Educational Resources in Educational Practice: A Qualitative Study,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 5, p. 239, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050239
24
[24] M. Taimalu and P. Luik, “The impact of beliefs and knowledge on the integration of technology among teacher educators: A path analysis,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 79, pp. 101–110, Mar. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.012
25
[25] J. E. Ho, “What counts? The critical role of qualitative data in teachers' decision making,” Eval. Program Plann., vol. 91, p. 102046, Apr. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102046
26
[26] S. H. K. Al-Saadi, M. A. Shahat, and M. H. Nasr, “Science teachers' perceptions and classroom implementation of the argument-driven inquiry (ADI) model in primary education,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., pp. 1–25, Dec. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2595580
27
[27] M. Adsız and S. Dinçer, “The Analysis of Classroom Management Challenges Faced by Teachers in Online Classrooms,” TechTrends, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 345–361, Mar. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01042-8
28
[28] “Who Really Cares about Using Education Research in Policy and Practice?” in Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/bc641427-en
29
[29] T. Wang, T. Dai, L. Yang, L. Osmanova, and D. Hwarari, “Digital innovation in higher education: comparing approaches in developed and developing countries,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, Jan. 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1723087
30
[30] B. Ndulu, E. Stuart, S. Dercon, and P. Knaack, Driving Digital Transformation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192872845.001.0001
31
[31] W. M. Lim, “What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines,” Australas. Mark. J., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 199–229, May 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
32
[32] S. Sankalaite et al., “A Qualitative Study into Teacher-Student Interaction Strategies Employed to Support Primary School Children's Working Memory,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 11, p. 1149, Nov. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111149
33
[33] B. S. Putri, R. Oktafiani, N. U. Sabila, and D. D. Djoa, “Women's Self-Confidence in Education and Social Welfare: A Systematic Literature Review Based on International Women's Day Insights,” Women, Educ. Soc. Welf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–38, Jun. 2025. https://doi.org/10.70211/wesw.v2i1.298
34
[34] D. Baziukė, I. Rupšienė, K. Kesylė, and A. Norvilienė, “How e-Learning Platforms Are Addressing Project-Based Learning: An Assessment of Digital Learning Tools in Primary Education,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 23, p. 12422, Nov. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312422
35
[35] L. Zheng, S. Chen, H. Zhang, Y. Feng, and X. Gu, “Evolving knowledge structures in technology integration: Tracking changes embedded in teaching artifacts,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 162, p. 105072, Aug. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105072
36
[36] W. Shiu, “Conceptualising the Pedagogical Purposes of Technologies by Technological, Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Substitution, Augmentation, Modification and Redefinition in English as a Second Language Classrooms,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 4, p. 411, Mar. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040411
37
[37] T. Lin, J. Zhang, and B. Xiong, “Effects of Technology Perceptions, Teacher Beliefs, and AI Literacy on AI Technology Adoption in Sustainable Mathematics Education,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 8, p. 3698, Apr. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083698
38
[38] S. H. Alshammari and T. A. Alrehaili, “The effect of teaching, social, and cognitive presence on student engagement in online courses: a structural equation modelling approach,” Acta Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 258, p. 105183, Aug. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105183
39
[39] F. Pettersson, “Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 187–204, Jan. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
40
[40] Y. R. Shi, K. F. K. Sin, and Y. Q. Wang, “Teacher professional development of digital pedagogy for inclusive education in post-pandemic era: Effects on teacher competence, self-efficacy, and work well-being,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 168, p. 105230, Dec. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105230
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yunita Hariandini, Ilyas Bangun Yuda, Waseem Ahmed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Tools
Citation Impact
Crossref Cited-by
0
citations
Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.
Last checked 11 Sep 2026.
.png)
