Enhancing REDD+ Effectiveness in Indonesia Through Governance Reforms, Sustainable Finance, and Community Participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70211/ijesi.v2i2.309Keywords:
REDD Implementation, Forest Governance, Land Tenure Security, Sustainable FinancingAbstract
The global REDD+ framework designed to curb greenhouse gas emissions by reducing deforestation and forest degradation has become a central pillar of international climate mitigation efforts, particularly in tropical forest nations such as Indonesia. Despite its significant potential, the implementation of REDD+ in Indonesia continues to encounter systemic barriers that undermine its effectiveness. Key challenges include fragmented and weak governance systems, inconsistent and unpredictable financial support, unresolved land tenure arrangements, and the persistent exclusion of indigenous and local communities from meaningful participation in forest management. These structural limitations diminish the capacity of REDD+ to generate measurable and sustained climate benefits. This study provides an in depth examination of the institutional, socio-political, and economic obstacles that constrain REDD+ performance in Indonesia. It argues that the current project oriented and carbon-accounting–driven model must evolve into a more integrated governance architecture that aligns environmental conservation with livelihood security and equitable resource distribution. To strengthen REDD+ outcomes, the research advances several policy innovations, including the decentralization of forest governance, diversification of long-term financing pathways, recognition and protection of customary land rights, and systematic incorporation of local ecological knowledge. Enhanced monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems are also highlighted as essential for ensuring transparency and accountability. Insights from case studies in Central Kalimantan and West Papua further demonstrate that the durability of REDD+ initiatives hinges on community empowerment, clear land tenure arrangements, and reliable funding mechanisms. Together, these findings emphasize the urgent need to redesign REDD+ governance in Indonesia to ensure it functions not only as a climate mitigation instrument but also as a socially just and economically viable conservation strategy.
References
P. Smith et al., “Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?,” Glob. Change Biol., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1532–1575, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14878
H. Hartmann et al., “Climate Change Risks to Global Forest Health: Emergence of Unexpected Events of Elevated Tree Mortality Worldwide,” Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 673–702, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-102820-012804
R. A. Houghton and A. A. Nassikas, “Negative emissions from stopping deforestation and forest degradation, globally,” Glob. Change Biol., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 350–359, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13876
L. J. R. Nunes, C. I. R. Meireles, C. J. Pinto Gomes, and N. M. C. Almeida Ribeiro, “Forest Management and Climate Change Mitigation: A Review on Carbon Cycle Flow Models for the Sustainability of Resources,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 19, p. 5276, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195276
R. A. Houghton, “Interactions Between Land-Use Change and Climate-Carbon Cycle Feedbacks,” Curr. Clim. Change Rep., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 115–127, June 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0099-9
L. Tacconi and M. Z. Muttaqin, “Policy forum: Institutional architecture and activities to reduce emissions from forests in Indonesia,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 108, p. 101980, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101980
A. Gatto and E. R. Sadik-Zada, “REDD+ in Indonesia: An assessment of the international environmental program,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 24045–24060, Oct. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05368-w
L. Juniyanti, H. Purnomo, H. Kartodihardjo, and L. B. Prasetyo, “Understanding the Driving Forces and Actors of Land Change Due to Forestry and Agricultural Practices in Sumatra and Kalimantan: A Systematic Review,” Land, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 463, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050463
M. Alamgir et al., “High-risk infrastructure projects pose imminent threats to forests in Indonesian Borneo,” Sci. Rep., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 140, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36594-8
L. Tacconi, R. J. Rodrigues, and A. Maryudi, “Law enforcement and deforestation: Lessons for Indonesia from Brazil,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 108, p. 101943, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.029
B. Maxton-Lee, “Material Realities: Why Indonesian Deforestation Persists and Conservation Fails,” J. Contemp. Asia, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 419–444, May 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1402204
S. Sloan et al., “Infrastructure development and contested forest governance threaten the Leuser Ecosystem, Indonesia,” Land Use Policy, vol. 77, pp. 298–309, Sept. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.043
B. Tesfaye, M. Lengoiboni, J. Zevenbergen, and B. Simane, “Rethinking the Impact of Land Certification on Tenure Security, Land Disputes, Land Management, and Agricultural Production: Insights from South Wello, Ethiopia,” Land, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1713, Sept. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091713
M. F. Ayano, “Understanding the Local Complexities in Land Law Reforms: The Case of Land Inalienability in Ethiopia, 1991–2018,” Law Soc. Inq., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 2398–2438, Nov. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2024.28
R. Clark, J. Reed, and T. Sunderland, “Bridging funding gaps for climate and sustainable development: Pitfalls, progress and potential of private finance,” Land Use Policy, vol. 71, pp. 335–346, Feb. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.013
B. Fan, X. Hua, and Y. Kono, “Transcending banana investments: Unraveling the hidden dynamics of Chinese land investment in Laos,” Land Use Policy, vol. 158, p. 107731, Nov. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107731
F. Artioli, “Sale of public land as a financing instrument. The unspoken political choices and distributional effects of land-based solutions,” Land Use Policy, vol. 104, p. 105199, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105199
K. G. Austin et al., “A review of land-based greenhouse gas flux estimates in Indonesia,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 13, no. 5, p. 055003, May 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab531
W. Eko Cahyono, Parikesit, B. Joy, W. Setyawati, and R. Mahdi, “Projection of CO₂ emissions in Indonesia,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 63, pp. S438–S444, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.091
A. Cubas-Baez, W. Sunderlin, A. M. Larson, and A. Frechette, “From promises to practice: Persistent challenges in safeguarding local rights in forest carbon market initiatives,” CABI Rev., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 0025, Apr. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2025.0025
A. Streck, “REDD+ and leakage: debunking myths and promoting integrated solutions,” Clim. Policy, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 843–852, July 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1920363
T. T. Pham et al., “Participation and influence of REDD+ actors in Vietnam, 2011–2019,” Glob. Environ. Change, vol. 68, p. 102249, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102249
C. McDermott et al., “The evolving governance of REDD+,” in Forests, Climate, Biodiversity and People: Assessing a Decade of REDD+, IUFRO, Vienna, 2022, pp. 21–60. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/files/209083341/ws40_1.pdf
M. Mulyani and P. Jepson, “REDD+ and Forest Governance in Indonesia: A Multistakeholder Study of Perceived Challenges and Opportunities,” J. Environ. Dev., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 261–283, Sept. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496513494203
A. B. Setyowati, Governing the ungovernable: contesting and reworking REDD+ in Indonesia, vol. 27, no. 1, 2020, pp. 456–475. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23185/0
K. Morita and K. Matsumoto, “Challenges and lessons learned for REDD+ finance and its governance,” Carbon Balance Manag., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 8, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-023-00228-y
A. Glover and H. Schroeder, “Legitimacy in REDD+ governance in Indonesia,” Int. Environ. Agreem. Polit. Law Econ., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 695–708, Oct. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9341-x
K. R. M. Suiseeya, Contesting justice in global forest governance: The promises and pitfalls of REDD+, vol. 15, no. 2, Medknow, 2017, pp. 189–200. https://journals.lww.com/coas/fulltext/2017/15020/contesting_justice_in_global_forest_governance_.7.aspx
M. Moeliono et al., Information networks and power: confronting the “wicked problem” of REDD+ in Indonesia, vol. 19, no. 2, JSTOR, 2014. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269526
P. Agung et al., “Reform or reversal: the impact of REDD+ readiness on forest governance in Indonesia,” Clim. Policy, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 748–768, Nov. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.941317
A. McGregor et al., “Beyond Carbon, More Than Forest? REDD+ Governmentality in Indonesia,” Environ. Plan. Econ. Space, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 138–155, Jan. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1068/a140054p
H. J. Boer, “Power, REDD+ and reforming forest governance in Indonesia,” Third World Q., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 783–800, May 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1703178
C. Overdevest and J. Zeitlin, “Experimentalism in transnational forest governance: Implementing European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreements in Indonesia and Ghana,” Regul. Gov., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 64–87, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12180
S. Roengtam, A. Agustiyara, and A. Nurmandi, “Making Network Governance Work in Forest Land-Use Policy in the Local Government,” Sage Open, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 21582440231194491, July 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231194491
W. Andriyana and K. Hogl, “Decentralization Drivers beyond Legal Provisions: The Case of Collaborative Forest Management in Java Island,” Forests, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 685, Aug. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10080685
P. I. Rietberg and O. Hospes, “Unpacking land acquisition at the oil palm frontier: Obscuring customary rights and local authority in West Kalimantan, Indonesia,” Asia Pac. Viewp., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 338–348, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12206
N. M. Dawson et al., “Barriers to equity in REDD+: Deficiencies in national interpretation processes constrain adaptation to context,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 88, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.009
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wally A. Sowe, Ebrima Ceesay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
