Development of Early Warning Systems and Structural-Non-Structural Strategies for Flood Management in Urban Industrial Area
Article Integrity
Article Metrics
274
Article Views
451
PDF Downloads
0
Crossref Citations
Abstract
This study aims to develop a holistic flood mitigation framework for the Jababeka Industrial Estate, a region increasingly affected by flooding due to accelerated land-use changes, diminished infiltration capacity, and insufficient drainage systems. The research integrates both structural and non-structural components, including the conceptualization of a real-time early warning system tailored for industrial urban environments. The methodology involved a detailed hydrological evaluation based on a decade of rainfall records collected from three meteorological stations. These data underwent consistency assessments using RAPS, trend analysis, and outlier detection, followed by the calculation of regional average rainfall through the Thiessen polygon method. Statistical distributions were applied to generate design rainfall values for return periods of 2 to 100 years, and flood discharges were estimated using four synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) models: Snyder, Nakayasu, GAMA I, and ITB. Simulation of flood scenarios was conducted with the HEC-HMS platform, and field assessments were used to identify critical infrastructure deficiencies. The analysis revealed high-risk areas requiring structural upgrades such as river channel improvements, the addition of retention basins, and enhanced pumping systems. Additionally, the study proposes a sensor-integrated early warning mechanism capable of transmitting automatic alerts to stakeholders. The integrated strategy demonstrated here offers a scalable and transferable model for climate-resilient flood management, particularly relevant for rapidly urbanizing industrial zones facing intensifying hydrometeorological threats due to climate change and unregulated development.
References
1
H. Chang and J. Franczyk, “Climate Change, Land-Use Change, and Floods: Toward an Integrated Assessment,” Geogr. Compass, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1549–1579, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00136.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00136.x
2
V. Avashia and A. Garg, “Implications of Land Use Transitions and Climate Change on Local Flooding in Urban Areas: An Assessment of 42 Indian Cities,” Land Use Policy, vol. 95, p. 104571, Jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104571
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104571
3
N. M. Iskandar, “Opportunities of Low Impact Development for Water Infrastructure in Jakarta, Indonesia,” May 2021, accessed: May 15, 2025. https://hdl.handle.net/2152/89508
4
I. Nowogoński, “Runoff Volume Reduction Using Green Infrastructure,” Land, vol. 10, no. 3, art. no. 3, Mar. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030297
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030297
5
H. E. Golden and N. Hoghooghi, “Green Infrastructure and Its Catchment-Scale Effects: An Emerging Science,” Wires Water, vol. 5, no. 1, p. e1254, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1254
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1254
6
V. Pappalardo, D. La Rosa, A. Campisano, and P. La Greca, “The potential of green infrastructure application in urban runoff control for land use planning: A preliminary evaluation from a southern Italy case study,” Ecosyst. Serv., vol. 26, pp. 345–354, Aug. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.015
7
T. Zölch, L. Henze, P. Keilholz, and S. Pauleit, “Regulating urban surface runoff through nature-based solutions - An assessment at the micro-scale,” Environ. Res., vol. 157, pp. 135–144, Aug. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023
8
G. Dharmarathne, A. O. Waduge, M. Bogahawaththa, U. Rathnayake, and D. P. P. Meddage, “Adapting cities to the surge: A comprehensive review of climate-induced urban flooding,” Results Eng., vol. 22, p. 102123, Jun. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102123
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102123
9
N. N. R. Prasad and P. and Narayanan, “Vulnerability assessment of flood-affected locations of Bangalore by using multi-criteria evaluation,” Ann. GIS, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 151–162, Apr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2016.1144649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2016.1144649
10
S. A. Markolf, C. Hoehne, A. Fraser, M. V. Chester, and B. S. Underwood, “Transportation resilience to climate change and extreme weather events - Beyond risk and robustness,” Transp. Policy, vol. 74, pp. 174–186, Feb. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.003
11
M. Diakakis, N. Boufidis, J. M. Salanova Grau, E. Andreadakis, and I. Stamos, “A systematic assessment of the effects of extreme flash floods on transportation infrastructure and circulation: The example of the 2017 Mandra flood,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 47, p. 101542, Aug. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101542
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101542
12
M. Karami, R. Sulistyorini, and I. M. Ardianti, “Resilient modulus master curve for BRA-modified asphalt mixtures,” Roads Bridg. - Drogi Mosty, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 315–331, Dec. 2020. https://doi.org/10.7409/rabdim.020.020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7409/rabdim.020.020
13
J.-L. Martel, F. P. Brissette, P. Lucas-Picher, M. Troin, and R. Arsenault, “Climate change and rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves: Overview of science and guidelines for adaptation,” J. Hydrol. Eng., vol. 26, no. 10, p. 03121001, Oct. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002122
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002122
14
H. Huang, H. Cui, and Q. Ge, “Assessment of potential risks induced by increasing extreme precipitation under climate change,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 2059–2079, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04768-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04768-9
15
S. S. Maity and R. Maity, “Changing pattern of intensity-duration-frequency relationship of precipitation due to climate change,” Water Resour. Manag., vol. 36, no. 14, pp. 5371–5399, Nov. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03313-y
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03313-y
16
D. Touma et al., “Climate change increases risk of extreme rainfall following wildfire in the western United States,” Sci. Adv., vol. 8, no. 13, p. eabm0320, Apr. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm0320
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm0320
17
H. J. Fowler et al., Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes, vol. 2, no. 2. Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2021, pp. 107–122. Accessed: May 15, 2025. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-020-00128-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6
18
M. H. Glantz and G. E. Pierce, “Forecast hesitancy: Why are people reluctant to believe, accept, or respond to various weather, water, and climate hazard-related forecasts?,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 600–609, Aug. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00353-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00353-7
19
S. M. Rezvani et al., A systematic literature review on urban resilience enabled with asset and disaster risk management approaches and GIS-based decision support tools, vol. 13, no. 4. MDPI, 2023, p. 2223. Accessed: May 15, 2025. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/4/2223. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042223
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042223
20
A. Mishra et al., “An overview of flood concepts, challenges, and future directions,” J. Hydrol. Eng., vol. 27, no. 6, p. 03122001, Jun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002164
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002164
21
A. Bagheri and G.-J. Liu, “Climate change and urban flooding: Assessing remote sensing data and flood modeling techniques: A comprehensive review,” Environ. Rev., vol. 33, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2024-0065
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2024-0065
22
V. Kumar et al., “Comprehensive overview of flood modeling approaches: A review of recent advances,” Hydrology, vol. 10, no. 7, art. no. 7, Jul. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10070141
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10070141
23
D. Althoff, L. N. Rodrigues, and D. D. da Silva, Addressing hydrological modeling in watersheds under land cover change with deep learning, vol. 154. Elsevier, 2021, p. 103965. Accessed: May 15, 2025. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309170821001202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103965
24
Z. Sokol et al., “The role of weather radar in rainfall estimation and its application in meteorological and hydrological modelling—A review,” Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 351, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030351
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030351
25
S. Azizi, A. R. Ilderomi, and H. Noori, “Investigating the effects of land use change on flood hydrograph using HEC-HMS hydrologic model (case study: Ekbatan Dam),” Nat. Hazards, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 145–160, Oct. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04830-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04830-6
26
J. U. Guduru et al., Rainfall-runoff modeling using HEC-HMS model for Meki River watershed, Rift Valley Basin, Ethiopia, vol. 197. Elsevier, 2023, p. 104743. Accessed: May 15, 2025. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464343X22002953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2022.104743
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2022.104743
27
A. Al-Fugara et al., Hydrological and hydrodynamic modeling for flash flood and embankment dam break scenario: Hazard mapping of extreme storm events, vol. 15, no. 3. MDPI, 2023, p. 1758. Accessed: May 15, 2025. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031758
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031758
28
H. Apel, A. H. Thieken, B. Merz, and G. Blöschl, “Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 295–308, Apr. 2004. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004
29
G. Tsakiris, “Flood risk assessment: Concepts, modelling, applications,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1361–1369, May 2014. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1361-2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1361-2014
30
B. Merz et al., “Floods and climate: Emerging perspectives for flood risk assessment and management,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1921–1942, Jul. 2014. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1921-2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1921-2014
31
G. Li et al., “Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate diversity,” Nat. Commun., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1628, Mar. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29324-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29324-2
Author Biographies
Ashruri
Civil Engineering Program
Tri Budi Wibowo
PT. Segoro Kidul
M Rizky Ismail
Enviroment Engineering Program
Ahmad Zakaria
Civil Engineering Program
Muhammad Haviz
Dept Of Chemical Engineering
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ashruri, Tri Budi Wibowo, M Rizky Ismail, Ahmad Zakaria, Muhamamd Haviz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Information
Published
2025-05-23
Issue
Article Tools
Citation Impact
Crossref Cited-by
0
citations
Counted from citation links between Crossref-registered works.
Last checked 25 Sep 2026.
